Journals / International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Validity and Reliability of the Solidarity in Pandemics Scale

Pages
230–241
Publication Date
2021-07-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This analysis indicates that the Solidarity in Pandemics Scale is a valid and reliable psychometric tool.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study developed a measure of solidarity levels during pandemics, the Solidarity in Pandemics Scale (SPS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:This was achieved using a study group of 842 individuals aged between 18 and 65 from different segments of society who had experienced the COVID-19 pandemic and differed in age, gender, and socioeconomic status.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This analysis indicates that the Solidarity in Pandemics Scale is a valid and reliable psychometric tool.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Solidarity · pandemics · solidarity in pandemics

Abstract

This study developed a measure of solidarity levels during pandemics, the Solidarity in Pandemics Scale (SPS). This was achieved using a study group of 842 individuals aged between 18 and 65 from different segments of society who had experienced the COVID-19 pandemic and differed in age, gender, and socioeconomic status. Exploratory factor analysis was used to establish the construct validity of the scale, producing a 15-item scale with a one-dimensional structure that explained 34.36% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis using a different study group revealed that all items have significant t-values, and the model established according to model fit indexes has meaningful and acceptable fit values. The internal consistency of the scale results was calculated using the Cronbach Alpha coefficient, and a reliability of .85 in terms of internal consistency was obtained. Test-retest reliability results as another indicator of reliability were found to be .85. Scores on the Altruism Scale were compared with those on the SPS to evaluate the scale’s criterion validity, and a significant relationship was found between the two scale scores. This analysis indicates that the Solidarity in Pandemics Scale is a valid and reliable psychometric tool.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUMAN, M., ERYİĞİT, D., TUNÇ, E. B., PARLAK, S. (2021). Validity and Reliability of the Solidarity in Pandemics Scale. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 230–241. https://ajindex.com/articles/768140

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akın, H. (2018). Felaket geliyorum demişti: Ortaçağda yaşanan büyük veba salgını ve toplumsal yaşamdaki sonuçları üzerine bir değerlendirme. Kebikeç: İnsan Bilimleri İçin Kaynak Araştırmaları Dergisi, 46, 247-296.
  2. Altın, Z. (2020). Covid-19 pandemisinde yaşlılar. Tepecik Eğit. ve Araşt. Hast. Dergisi, 30, 49-57. http://dx.doi:10.5222/terh.2020.93723
  3. Ayalon, L., Chasteen, A., Diehl, M., Levy, B., Neupert, S. D., Rothermund, K.,. & Wahl, H. W. (2020). Aging in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Avoiding ageism and fostering intergenerational solidarity. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 20, 1-4. http://dx.doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaa051
  4. Bayertz, K. (Ed.). (1999). Solidarity (Vol. 5). Springer Science & Business Media. Blasi, L., Bordonaro, R., Borsellino, N., Butera, A., Caruso, M., Cordio, S.,. & Spada, M. (2020). Reactions and countermeasures of medical oncologists towards the incoming COVID-19 pandemic: a WhatsApp messenger-based report from the Italian College of Chief Medical Oncologists. Ecancermedicalscience, 14. http://dx.doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1046 Blondé, J., & Girandola, F. (2019). When defensive reactions contribute to the acceptance of fear-arousing communications. Current Psychology, 38(1), 75-83. http://dx.doi: 10.1007/s12144-017-9590-z Bostan, S., Erdem, R., Öztürk, Y. E., Kılıç, T., & Yılmaz, A. (2020). The Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Turkish Society. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 17(6), 1-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/7944.
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 32(32), 470-483.
  6. Chakraborty, I., & Maity, P. (2020). COVID-19 outbreak: Migration, effects on society, global environment and prevention. Science of the Total Environment, 728, 1-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138882.
  7. Cheng, K. K., Lam, T. H., & Leung, C. C. (2020). Wearing face masks in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic: Altruism and solidarity. The Lancet. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(20)30918-1.
  8. Civicus (2020). Solidarity in the time of COVID-19: Civil society responses to the pandemic. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/solidarity-in-the-time-of-covid-19_en.pdf CNNTURK, (2020, January). “Hayırsever vatandaş, İzmit’te bakkalda veresiye defterini kapattı”. (24.01.2020). https://www.cnnturk.com/turkiye/hayirsever-vatandas-izmitte-bakkalda-veresiye-defterini-kapatti
  9. Cohn, S. K. (2012). Pandemics: Waves of disease, w