SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Advice for Academician Mothers with Only Child: “I Wish He Had A Brother”

Hasan BATMAZ
Yağmur ULUSOY
Pages
509–524
Publication Date
2022-03-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it has been seen that academic mothers with one child are supported by their spouses to have one child; however, most of them want to have a second child. tap here to enter text.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to reveal what kind of reactions academic mothers get from having a only child and their thoughts on having a child again.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group of research was composed of 9 academician mothers (32-51 age range; age range at marriage: 22-35; duration of the marriage; between 7-23 years) with an only child (5-25 age range), using the criterion sampling method, which is one of the purposive sampling methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it has been seen that academic mothers with one child are supported by their spouses to have one child; however, most of them want to have a second child. tap here to enter text.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Only child · academician mother · family demography

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to reveal what kind of reactions academic mothers get from having a only child and their thoughts on having a child again. In this study, descriptive phenomenology design, one of the qualitative research designs, was used. The study group of research was composed of 9 academician mothers (32-51 age range; age range at marriage: 22-35; duration of the marriage; between 7-23 years) with an only child (5-25 age range), using the criterion sampling method, which is one of the purposive sampling methods. Inclusion criteria for the research; They are academicians who have a child of at least 5 years old and have only child. A semi-structured interview was used to collect the data. Content analysis was used to analyze the data collected. As a result of the analysis, the theme of "I wish he had a brother" was reached. As a result, it has been seen that academic mothers with one child are supported by their spouses to have one child; however, most of them want to have a second child. tap here to enter text.

🔖

Cite This Article

BATMAZ, H., ULUSOY, Y. (2022). Advice for Academician Mothers with Only Child: “I Wish He Had A Brother”. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 509–524. https://ajindex.com/articles/768068

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adler, A. (1928). Characteristics of the first, second, and third child. Children, 3(5), 14. Adler, A. (1931): What life should mean to you. Perigree Books. Adler, A. (1964). Problems of neurosis. Harper Torchbooks. Armenti, C. (2004). May babies and posttenure babies: Maternal decisions of women professors. The Review of Higher Education, 27(2), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2003.0046
  2. Aslan, Ş., ve Atabey, A. (2005). Küresel rekabette kadın girişimcilerin rolü ve türk kadın girişimci tipolojisi. Journal of Azerbaijani Studies, 1-17. http://www.jhss-khazar.org
  3. Aydın, S. (2019). Tek çocuklu aileler ve çoğul çocuklu ailelerin çocuklarının sosyal beceri düzeyi bakımından değerlendirilmesi [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Üsküdar Üniversitesi,
  4. İstanbul.
  5. Aydoğdu, F., & Dilekmen, M. (2016). Ebeveyn tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından değerlendirilmesi. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 569-585.
  6. Bailey, N. B. K. D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (1999). The advantages and challenges of working here, there, anywhere, and anytime. Organizational Dynamics, 28(2), 53-68. https://www.academia.edu./
  7. Baker, M. (2008, July). The family life of academics: Gendered priorities and institutional constraints. In Annual Conference of the Australian Institute of Family Studies (pp. 9-11)
  8. Beddoes, K., & Pawley, A. L. (2014). ‘Different people have different priorities’: work–family balance, gender, and the discourse of choice. Studies in Higher Education, 39(9), 1573-1585. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.801432
  9. Bekir, H., Şahin, H., & Aydın, R. (2013). 4-7 yaş arası sağlıklı çocukların ebeveyn görüşlerine göre yaşam kalitelerinin belirlenmesi. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken/Journal of World of Turks, 5(3), 7-19.
  10. Belmont, L., & Marolla, F. A. (1973). Birth order, family size, and intelligence: A study of a total population of 19-year-old men born in the Netherlands is presented. Science, 182(4117), 1096-1101. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.182.4117.1096
  11. Birleşmiş Milletler Nüfus Fonu (2018). 9 Eylül 2020, https://www.unfpa.org/annual-report-2018#!/indicators-2.
  12. Blake, J. (1981). The only child in America: Prejudice versus performance. Population and Development Review, 43-54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1972763
  13. Büyüköztürk, Kılıç-Çakmak, Erkan-Akgün, Karadeniz ve Demirel, (2019). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem. Census (2018). https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/