Journals / International Journal of Engineering Technologies / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4

Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Aerodynamics Characteristics of NACA 0015 Aerofoil

Pages
132–141
Publication Date
2017-04-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The use of the CFD technology greatly reduces the overall investment and efforts for aerofoil design.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An aerofoil is stream line body.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Symmetric aerofoil (NACA 0015) is used in many applications such as in aircraft submarine fins, rotary and some fixed wings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The use of the CFD technology greatly reduces the overall investment and efforts for aerofoil design.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:CFD Fluent Flow · Lift and Drag Force · Experimental analysis

Abstract

An aerofoil is stream line body. Symmetric aerofoil (NACA 0015) is used in many applications such as in aircraft submarine fins, rotary and some fixed wings. The ultimate objective of an aerofoil is to obtain the lift necessary to keep an airplane in the air. But construction of the blade with proper angle of attack and implementation has significant effect on lift force. Insufficient lift force might cause fail of airplane flying, especially at high speed. Modern technologist use different simulation techniques to avoid costly model testing. But simulation is based on some assumption. Thus practically results are not fully authentic and have a deviation. In this work numerical and experimental investigation of NACA 0015 is studied at different angle of attack (degree) at different velocity of air by determining the forces at every two degrees from 00 to 180. The experimental is conveyed in a low speed wind tunnel. The numerical analysis is conducted using ANSYS (combined with CFD and FLUENT FLOW). The use of the CFD technology greatly reduces the overall investment and efforts for aerofoil design. CFD method contributes to visualize the flow pattern inside aerofoil and takes less time and faster according to experimental methods. After completing the experimental and numerical data is compared. Therefore objective of this paper is to find the deviation and validation of aerodynamics characteristics of aerofoil NACA 0015 for experimental and numerical method.

🔖

Cite This Article

Rubel, R. I., Uddin, M. K., ISLAM, M. Z., Rokunuzzaman, M. (2017). Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Aerodynamics Characteristics of NACA 0015 Aerofoil. International Journal of Engineering Technologies, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4, 132–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/766973

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. K. S. Patel, S. B. Patel, U. B. Patel, and A. P. Ahuja, “CFD Analysis of an Aerofoil”, International Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 3, issue. 3, pp. 154-158, March 2014. I. B. Llorca, “CFD Analysis and Assessment of the Stability and Control of a Supersonic Business Jet”, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden, March 2015.
  2. Y. T. Chuen, M. Z. Abdullah, and Z. Husain, “The Effects of Turbulence Intensity on the Performance Characteristics of NACA 0015 and Eagle 150 Airfoils”, Proc. NSF Seminar 2002.
  3. W. L. Siauw, J. P. Bonnet, and J. Tensi, “Physics of Separated Flow Over a NACA 0015 Airfoil and Detection of Flow Separation”, 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 5 - 8 January 2009,
  4. Orlando, Florida. M. R. Islam, M. A. Hossain, M. N. Uddin, and M. Mashud, “Experimental Evaluation of Aerodynamics Characteristics of a Baseline Aerofoil”, American Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 4, Issue. 1, pp. 91-96, 2015. S. Kandwal, and S. Singh, “Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Fluid Flow and Aerodynamic Forces on an Aerofoil”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, vol. 1, Issue. 7, 2012.
  5. Dr. R. K. Bansal, Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulic Mechunes, 9th ed., Laxmi Publication (P) Ltd, 2010, pp. 686- 687. M. Morshed, S. B. Sayeed, S. A. A. Mamun, and J. Alam, “Investigation of Drag Analysis of Four Different Profiles Tested at Subsonic Wind Tunnel”, Journal of Modern Science and Technology, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 113-126, 2014. (Article) E. H. Lewitt, Hydraulics and Fluid Mechanics, 10th ed., Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons Ltd, 1963, pp. 382-383. M. S. Selig, and J. J. Guglielmo, “High-Lift Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Design”, Journal of Aircraft, vol. 34, No. 1, 1997.
  6. Z. Yang, H. Igarashi, M. Martin, and Hui Hu, “An Experimental Investigation on Aerodynamic Hysteresis of a Low-Reynolds Number Aerofoil”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA-2008-0315, 2008.
  7. G. R. Srinivasan, J. A. Ekaterinaris, and W. J. McCroskey, “Evaluation of Turbulence Model for Unsteady Flows of an Oscillating Aerofoil”, Elsevier Science Ltd., Computers & Fluids, vol. 24, No. 7, 1995, pp. 833-861.
  8. L. B. Li, Y. W. Ma, and L. Liu, “Numerical Simulation on Aerodynamics Performance of Wind Turbine Aerofoil”, Conf. on World Automation Congress (WAC), Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, Publisher by IEEE, pp. 1-4, 2012.
  9. M. Gaunaa, J. N. Sørensen, P. S. Larsen, “Unsteady Aerodynamic Forces on NACA 0015