Journals / International Journal of Educational Research Review / 2019 / Cilt: 4

Higher-Order Thinking Skills on Test Items Designed by English Teachers: A Content Analysis

Pages
756–765
Publication Date
2019-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was foundthat most questions were dominated by lower-order thinking skills, specifically understanding level,with the total percentage of more than 50% each set of test items.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In dealing with the demand for critical and creative thinking skills in the 21st-century, the Indonesiagovernment has implemented 2013 curriculum which promotes higher-order thinking skills (HOTS)in the classroom.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was conducted qualitatively by analyzing four sets of test items, gathered from asenior high school in Indonesia from 2016 to 2019, using Bloom’s revised taxonomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was foundthat most questions were dominated by lower-order thinking skills, specifically understanding level,with the total percentage of more than 50% each set of test items.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Higher-order thinking skills · test items · bloom’s revised taxonomy

Abstract

In dealing with the demand for critical and creative thinking skills in the 21st-century, the Indonesiagovernment has implemented 2013 curriculum which promotes higher-order thinking skills (HOTS)in the classroom. However, the implementation of HOTS-based curriculum gave impact to the wayteacher assesses the students' thinking skills as they are expected to be able to design HOTS-basedtest items in assessing students. Accordingly, this study investigated the higher-order thinking skillsrepresented on the test items designed by English teachers of Indonesia at the senior high schoollevel. This study was conducted qualitatively by analyzing four sets of test items, gathered from asenior high school in Indonesia from 2016 to 2019, using Bloom’s revised taxonomy. It was foundthat most questions were dominated by lower-order thinking skills, specifically understanding level,with the total percentage of more than 50% each set of test items. However, the higher-orderthinking skill found in the test items is the only skill of analyzing while the skills of evaluating orcreating were not covered. Thus, it is suggested that an evaluation is important to evaluate the testitems made since the proportion of lower-order thinking skills as well as higher-order thinking skillsare not proportional and whether those test items can be sufficient to promote higher-order thinkingskills to the students.

🔖

Cite This Article

UTAMİ, F. D., NURKAMTO, J., MARMANTO, S. (2019). Higher-Order Thinking Skills on Test Items Designed by English Teachers: A Content Analysis. International Journal of Educational Research Review, Cilt: 4, 756–765. https://ajindex.com/articles/766301

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ahmad, U. L. (2016). Senior high school english national examination and thinking skills. Beyond Words, 4(2), 168–190. Retrieved from http://journal.wima.ac.id/indexed.php/BW%0AReferences
  2. Akin, A., Hamedoglu, M. A., Arslan, S., Akin, Ü., Celik, E., Kaya, Ç., & Arslan, N. (2015). The adaptation and validation of the turkish version of the critical thinking disposition scale ( CTDS ). Educational Research Association: The International Journal of Educational Researchers, 6(1), 31–35. Alzu’bi, M. A. (2014). The extend of adaptation bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive domain ın english questions ıncluded in general secondary exams. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(2), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.2p.67
  3. Anasy, Z. (2016). HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills) in reading exercise. Tarbiya: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 3(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v3il.3886
  4. Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. New York: Longman. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2010). Introduction to research in education (eight). Cengage Learning. Assare, Mohammadi, Forutan, & Salehizadeh. (2016). The impact of globalization on education. Journal of Administrative Management, Education, and Training, 12(5), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.4707
  5. Asysyifa, D. S., Jumaidi, J., Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Analysis of students critical thinking skills using partial credit models ( PCM ) in physics learning. International Journal of Educational Research Review (IJERE), 4(2), 245–253.
  6. Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess hıgher-order thınkıng skılls ın your classroom. Alexandria: ASCD. Conklin, W. (2012). Higher-order thinking skills to develop 21st century learners. Shell Educational Publishing, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.shelleducation.com
  7. Council, N. R. (2013). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington DC: National Academies Press. Duman,T. & Karagoz,S. (2016). An evaluation of Turkish teacher education system compared to other models in different countries. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 1 (1), 1-13
  8. Freahat, N. M., & Smadi, O. M. (2014). Lower-order and higher-order reading questions in secondary and university level efl textbooks in Jordan. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(9), 1804–1813. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.9.1804-1813
  9. Igbaria, A. K. (2013). A Content