Journals / International Journal of Educational Research Review / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Environmental Literacy: Comparison between Chemistry Teacher Candidates, Chemistry Teachers, and Individuals in Environmentally Related Professions

Pages
366–379
Publication Date
2022-10-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research, it was determined that the three participant groups were sufficient in the components of environmental attitude, environmental use, and environmental concern, but their level of knowledge about environmental issues was not sufficient.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An essential component of preventing environmental issues is environmental education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 793 people from three groups participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the research, it was determined that the three participant groups were sufficient in the components of environmental attitude, environmental use, and environmental concern, but their level of knowledge about environmental issues was not sufficient.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:environmental literacy · teacher candidates · teachers

Abstract

An essential component of preventing environmental issues is environmental education. Environmental education's primary goal is to raise people's environmental literacy—their understanding and sensitivity to the environment. The purpose of this study is to compare the environmental literacy of chemistry teacher candidates, chemistry teachers, and environmentally related professions in terms of their awareness of environmental issues, knowledge, attitude, and use. It also seeks to find out how gender and experience affect environmental literacy. A total of 793 people from three groups participated in the study. Participants completed an environmental literacy scale that included components for environmental knowledge, environmental attitude, environmental concern, and environmental use. According to the results of the research, it was determined that the three participant groups were sufficient in the components of environmental attitude, environmental use, and environmental concern, but their level of knowledge about environmental issues was not sufficient. Considering the total environmental literacy scores of the study groups, a statistically significant difference was determined in favor of chemistry teachers compared to the other groups. In addition, it was determined that the level of environmental literacy differed according to the o gender and professional experience of teachers.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDİL, E., ÇELİK, A. Y. (2022). Environmental Literacy: Comparison between Chemistry Teacher Candidates, Chemistry Teachers, and Individuals in Environmentally Related Professions. International Journal of Educational Research Review, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 366–379. https://ajindex.com/articles/766178

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akıllı, M. ve Genç, M. (2015). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin çevre okuryazarlığı alt boyutlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(2), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.87773
  2. Alım, M. (2006). Avrupa Birliği üyelik sürecinde Türkiye’de çevre ve ilköğretimde çevre eğitimi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 14 (2), 599-616.
  3. Arık, S., & Yılmaz, M. (2017). Fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının çevre sorunlarına yönelik tutumları ve çevre kirliliğine yönelik metaforik algıları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 25(3), 1147-1164.
  4. Atabek-Yiğit, E., Köklükaya, N., Yavuz, M., & Demirhan, E. (2014). Development and validation of environmental literacy scale for adults (ELSA). Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(3), 425-435.
  5. Atasoy, E. (2006). Çevre İçin Eğitim Çocuk Doğa Etkileşimi. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
  6. Atılgan, A., Coşkan, A., Saltuk, B. ve Erkan, M. (2007). Antalya yöresindeki seralarda kimyasal ve organik gübre kullanım düzeyleri ve olası çevre etkileri. Ekoloji Dergisi, 15(62), 37-47.
  7. Bogner, F. X., & Wiseman, M. (2006). Adolescents’ attitudes towards nature and environment: Quantifying the 2-MEV model. Environmentalist 26, 247–254.
  8. Bozkurt, M. (2011). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının çevre kavramları ile ilgili algılamalarının değerlendirilmesi ve bu algılamaların çevreye yönelik tutumları ile tutarlılığının incelenmesi. (Master Thesis). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp (Dissertion Number: 300333) Büyükkaynak, E., & Aslan, O. (2019). Matematik ve fen bilimleri eğitimi öğretmen adaylarının çevreye yönelik tutumları. Journal of International Social Research, 12(63). 797-808. http://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2019.3276
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, K. E., Akgün, E. Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık Casaló, L.V., Escario, J.J., Rodriguez-Sanchez, C., 2019. Analyzing differences between different types of pro-environmental behaviors: do attitude intensity and type of knowledge matter? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149, 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.024
  10. Çimen, H., & Benzer, S. (2019). Fen bilgisi ve sınıf öğretmen adaylarının sürdürülebilir çevreye yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi. İnsan ve İnsan, 6(21), 525-542. https://doi.org/10.29224/insanveinsan.475471
  11. Clayton, S., Bexell, S.M., Xu P., Tang,Y.F., Li, W. J., & Chen, L. (2019). Environmental literacy and nature experience in Chengdu, China. En