Journals / International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

The Prosocial-Antisocial Behavior and Empathic Skill Levels of Wheelchair Basketball Players in Sports

Pages
1–11
Publication Date
2019-06-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been concluded that perspective taking, empathic concern and fantasy which are dimensions of empathy do not show a difference in the variable being a national athlete or non-national athlete.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to find out the prosocial and antisocial behavior as well as the empathic skills of wheelchair basketball players in sports.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 230 wheelchair basketball players (216 males and 14 females) participated in this study which uses relational screening model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been concluded that perspective taking, empathic concern and fantasy which are dimensions of empathy do not show a difference in the variable being a national athlete or non-national athlete.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Wheelchair Basketball · Empathy · Prosocial-Antisocial Behavior in Sports

Abstract

This study aims to find out the prosocial and antisocial behavior as well as the empathic skills of wheelchair basketball players in sports. A total of 230 wheelchair basketball players (216 males and 14 females) participated in this study which uses relational screening model. The Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale (PABSS) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) were used as data collection tools. Independent t-test, Cronbach Alpha, One-Way Anova, Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis were used for the analysis of data. The data obtained shows that there is a low level, meaningful and positive correlation between the empathic skills of wheelchair basketball players and their tendency for prosocial behavior in sports. In addition, a medium-level, meaningful and negative correlation between their empathic skills and tendency for antisocial behavior was found. It has been concluded that perspective taking, empathic concern and fantasy which are dimensions of empathy do not show a difference in the variable being a national athlete or non-national athlete. It was seen that personal distress is higher in athletes who are not national athletes. As a result of the analysis it was found out that as the antisocial behavior of wheelchair basketball players towards their teammates and opponents increase, their fantasy levels decrease. In light of these findings, it may be said that while emphatic skills promote prosocial behavior in wheelchair basketball players, they decrease antisocial behavior. Based on these results, the empathy training which will be given to athletes to promote prosocial behavior in sports is of great importance.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALÇIKANLI, G. S., İLHAN, E. L., ESENTÜRK, O. K., ÇELİK, O. B. (2019). The Prosocial-Antisocial Behavior and Empathic Skill Levels of Wheelchair Basketball Players in Sports. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 1–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/766002

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akkoyun, F. (1987). Empatik eğilim ve ahlaki yargı. Psikoloji Dergisi, 6(21), 91-98.
  2. Brasile, F. M., & Hedrick, B. N. (1996). The relationship of skills of elite wheelchair basketball competitors to the international functional classification system. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 30(2), 114-127. Davis HM. Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983; 44(1): 113-126.
  3. Davis HM (1996). Empathy A Social Psychological Approach, 2nd. ed. USA: Westviewpress. Duquin, M.E., Schroeder-Braun, K. (1996). Power, empathy, and moral conflict in sport. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, Vol 2(4), 351-367.
  4. Engeler A (2005). Psikopati ve Antisosyal Kişilik Bozukluğu. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. İstanbul:
  5. İstanbul Üniversitesi.
  6. Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 701–778).
  7. New York, NY: Wiley. Finley, M. A., & Rodgers, M. M. (2004). Prevalence and identification of shoulder pathology in athletic and nonathletic wheelchair users with shoulder pain: a pilot study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 41(3B), 395., Greif BE, Hogan R. The Theory and Measurement of Empathy. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1973; 20(3): 280-284
  8. Hoffman, M. L. (2001). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Hudson, Z., & Brown, A. (2003). Athletes with disability. Physical therapies in sport and exercise, 521-533.
  10. Hutzler, Y., Vanlandewijck, Y., & Van Vlierberghe, M. (2000). Anaerobic performance of older female and male wheelchair basketball players on a mobile wheelchair ergometer. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17(4), 450-465.
  11. Kalliopuska, M. Empatia- tie ihmisyyteen. Helsinki. Kirjayhtyrna. 1983.
  12. Kasum, G., Lazarevic, L., Jakovljevic, S., Bacanac, L. & Eminovic, F. (2012). Personality characteristics of Serbian male wheelchair and professional basketball players. Acta Gymnica, 42(2), 41-47.
  13. Kavussanu, M. (2006). Motivational predictors of prosocial and antisocial behaviour in football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(06), 575-588.
  14. Kavussanu, M., Seal, A., & Phillips, D. (2006). Observed prosocial and antisocial behaviors in male soccer teams: Age differences across adolescence and the role of motivational variables. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18, 326–344.
  15. Kavussanu, M.,