SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Which Cold Application is More Effective for Tennis Elbow? Cooling Gel vs Cold Pack

Nihan ÖZÜNLÜ PEKYAVAŞ
Senay CEREZCİ DUYGU
Pages
16–21
Publication Date
2022-06-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Both cooling gel and cold pack application are found effective in decreasing skin temperature in patients with tennis elbow and their use should be considered in treatment program.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate which cold application is more effective to regulate skin temperature in patients with tennis elbow.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants: Fifty-four patients with tennis elbow were randomly divided into 2 groups as cooling gel group (n=27) and cold pack group (n=27).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Both cooling gel and cold pack application are found effective in decreasing skin temperature in patients with tennis elbow and their use should be considered in treatment program.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Thermal Analysis · Cold · Epicondylitis

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate which cold application is more effective to regulate skin temperature in patients with tennis elbow. Design: Randomized clinical study. Participants: Fifty-four patients with tennis elbow were randomly divided into 2 groups as cooling gel group (n=27) and cold pack group (n=27). Interventions: Cooling gel and cold pack applications were applied on painful lateral epicondyle region for 15 minutes. Main outcome measures: Patients were assessed before and after the application. Assessments included the severity of pain during wrist extension, evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and thermal imaging of lateral epicondyle region evaluated by Infrared Thermography (FLIR5 Thermal Camera). Results: There were no significant differences between baseline assessments of pain severity and thermographic measurements in both groups (p>0.05). Significant differences were found between baseline and post-application measurements at pain and thermographic measurements in both groups (p<0.05). In comparison of cooling gel and cold pack groups, no significant differences were found in means of pain (p=0.095) and thermal imaging results (p=0.333). Conclusion: Both cooling gel and cold pack application are found effective in decreasing skin temperature in patients with tennis elbow and their use should be considered in treatment program.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKYAVAŞ, N. Ö., DUYGU, S. C. (2022). Which Cold Application is More Effective for Tennis Elbow? Cooling Gel vs Cold Pack. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 16–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/765952

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. American Medical Association. Accessed January 8, 2018. https://www.ama-assn.org/.
  2. American Physiological Society. (2004). Adding Menthol to Topical Creams for Osteoarthritis Provides Significant Pain Relief. https:// www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2004-04/aps-amt041104.php. Beneliyahu, D. (1992). “Infrared Thermography and the Sports Injury Practice.” Dynamic Chiropractic 10 (7). Cerezci Duygu, S., Ozunlu Pekyavas, N., Uzun A., Cinar Medeni, O.,Baltaci, G., Er, F., Suveren, C., & Colakoglu, F.F. (2018). “Muscle Skin Temperature Responses for Hamstring and Quadriceps to Aerobic and Anaerobic Test Conditions in Turkish Olympic Sailing Athletes.” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7865-8.
  3. Coben, R., and Padolsky, I. (2008). “Infrared Imaging and Neurofeedback: Initial Reliability and Validity.” Journal of Neurotherapy 11 (3): 3–13. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10874200802126100. Downie, W. W., Leatham, P. A., Rhind, V. M., Wright, V., Branco, J. A., & Anderson, J. A. (1978). “Studies with Pain Rating Scales.” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 37 (4): 378–81.
  4. Fedorczyk, J. M. (2006). “Tennis Elbow: Blending Basic Science with Clinical Practice.” Journal of Hand Therapy 19 (2): 146–53. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2006.02.016.
  5. Goguin, J. -P., & Rush, Fr. (2003). “Lateral Epicondylitis.What Is It Really?” Current Orthopaedics 17: 386–89. https:// doi.org/ 10. 1016/S0268. Hong, Q. N., Durand, M. J., & Loisel, P. (2004). “Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: Where Is the Evidence?” Joint Bone Spine 71 (5): 369–73.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBSPIN.2003.05. 002. Hume, P. A., Reid, D., & Edwards, T. (2006). “Epicondylar Injury in Sport.” Sports Medicine 36 (2): 151–70. https://doi.org/ 10.2165/00007256-200636020-00005.
  6. Bishai, S. K., & Plancher, K. (2006). The Basic Science of Lateral Epicondylosis: Update for the Future. Techniques in Orthopaedics. Vol. 21.https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bto.0000252115.76643.78.
  7. Rotsalai, K. and Janwantanakul, P. (2005). “Comparison of Skin Surface Temperature during the Application of Various Cryotherapy Modalities.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86 (7): 1411–15.
  8. Knight, K. L. (1995). Cryotherapy in Sport Injury Management. Human Kinetics. Kraushaar, B. S., & Nirschl, R. P. (1999). “Tendinosis of the Elbow (Tennis Elbow). Clinical Features and Findings of Histological, Immunohistochemical, and Electron Microscopy Studies.” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume