Journals / International Journal of Academic Research in Education / 2015 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Stories from the Frontlines: In-Service Teachers’ Demotivating Factors and Policy Recommendations

Pages
40–52
Publication Date
2015-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Policy recommendations and implications of findings and future research are also discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this current study was to explore the demotivating factors among Indonesian senior high school English teachers in teaching English as a foreign language at two senior high schools in Jambi City, Indonesia through demographic background surveys and semi-structured in-depth interviews.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The interviews data were analyzed through using the constant comparative method developed by Glaser and Strauss (1967), six salient and interweaved themes related to the demotivating factors that emerged in this research were students’limited basic knowledge in English language, students’ lack of motivation, school environment, limited supporting facilities, working conditions, and teachers’ workload.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Policy recommendations and implications of findings and future research are also discussed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Demotivating factors · Indonesian English teachers · senior high schools

Abstract

The purpose of this current study was to explore the demotivating factors among Indonesian senior high school English teachers in teaching English as a foreign language at two senior high schools in Jambi City, Indonesia through demographic background surveys and semi-structured in-depth interviews. The research design was qualitative in the case approach. The interviews data were analyzed through using the constant comparative method developed by Glaser and Strauss (1967), six salient and interweaved themes related to the demotivating factors that emerged in this research were students’limited basic knowledge in English language, students’ lack of motivation, school environment, limited supporting facilities, working conditions, and teachers’ workload. Policy recommendations and implications of findings and future research are also discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUKMININ, A., MUAZZA, M., HUSTARNA, H., SARI, S. R. (2015). Stories from the Frontlines: In-Service Teachers’ Demotivating Factors and Policy Recommendations. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 40–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/765069

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Addison, R., & Brundrett, M. (2008). Motivation and demotivation of teachers in primary schools: The challenge of change. Education, 36(1), 79‐94. Aydin, S. (2012). Factors causing demotivation in EFL teaching process: A case study. The Qualitative Report, 17 (101), 1‐13. Chambers, G. (1993). Taking the 'de' out of demotivation. Language Learning Journal, 7, 13‐16. Creswell, J. W. (1997). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Creswell, J, W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Creswell, J, W. (2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. Dinham, S. & Scott, C. (2000). Moving into the third, outer domain of teacher satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 38 (4), 379‐396. Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Essex: Pearson Education Limited. Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (2011).Teaching and researching motivation. UK: Pearson Education Limited. Doyle, T., & Kim, M. Y. (1999). Teacher motivation and satisfaction in the United States and Korea. MEXTESOL Journal, 23(2), 35‐48. Fattash, M. M. (2013). Demotivating factors of university ESL teachers. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3 (19), 125‐ 132. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine. Hettiarachchi, S. (2013). English language teacher motivation in Sri Lankan public schools. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4 (1), pp. 1‐11. Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. B. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Boston: Sage Publications. Johnson, C. R. (2000). Factors influencing motivation and de‐motivation of Mexican EFL teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Vancouver, Canada. Kiziltepe, Z. (2008). Motivation and demotivation of university teachers. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis, Ltd. Linares, J. J. G., Diaz, A. J. C., Fuentes, M. C. P., & Acien, F. L. (2009). Teachers’ perceptions of school violence in a sample from three European countries. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(1), 49‐59. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, G.B. (1985).
  2. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Lynch, L. M. (2008). Three critical problems in English language teac