SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of Constructivist Teaching Approach on Learning Biology Subjects The Basic Unit of The Living Things Cell

Yapılandırmacı Öğretim Yaklaşımının Biyoloji Dersi Konularını Öğrenme Başarısı Üzerine Etkisi Canlılığın Temel Birimi Hücre

Özlem SAYGIN
N. Gökben ATILBOZ
Selahattin SALMAN
Pages
51–64
Publication Date
2006-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of this study it was found that students who have been taught with the constructivist teaching approach were more successful than the ones have been taught with the traditional teaching approach.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, by comparing the effectiveness of constructivist teaching approach with traditional teaching methods on learning the topic - cells, the level of success of the students has been investigated..
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of this study consisted of 47 students in two 9th classes who attend Konya-Kulu Anatolian High School.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of this study it was found that students who have been taught with the constructivist teaching approach were more successful than the ones have been taught with the traditional teaching approach.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yapılandırmacı öğretim yaklaşımı · öğrenme halkası · hücre

Abstract

In this study, by comparing the effectiveness of constructivist teaching approach with traditional teaching methods on learning the topic - cells, the level of success of the students has been investigated.. The sample of this study consisted of 47 students in two 9th classes who attend Konya-Kulu Anatolian High School. The cell subjects were taught according to the constructivist teaching approach in the experimental group while these subjects were taught according to the traditional teaching methods in the control group. Rodger Bybee\'s 5E model was used in the constructivist class. As a result of this study it was found that students who have been taught with the constructivist teaching approach were more successful than the ones have been taught with the traditional teaching approach.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, yapılandırmacı öğretim yaklaşımının lise 1.sınıf öğrencilerinin hücre ünitesini öğrenme başarıları üzerine olan etkisi geleneksel öğretim yöntemleriyle karşılaştırılarak incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemini Konya-Kulu Anadolu Lisesi\'nde öğrenim gören 47 lise 1.sınıf öğrencisi oluşturmuştur. Hücre ünitesi deney grubunda yapılandırmacı öğretim yaklaşımına göre işlenirken kontrol grubunda geleneksel öğretim yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Yapılandırmacı öğretim yaklaşımına göre düzenlenen derslerde Rodger Bybee\'nin 5E modeli kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, yapılandırmacı öğretim yaklaşımı ile öğrenim gören öğrencilerin hücre ünitesini öğrenmede geleneksel öğretim yöntemleri ile öğrenim gören öğrencileIn this study, by comparing the effectiveness of constructivist teaching approach with traditional teaching methods on learning the topic - cells, the level of success of the students has been investigated.. The sample of this study consisted of 47 students in two 9th classes who attend Konya-Kulu Anatolian High School. The cell subjects were taught according to the constructivist teaching approach in the experimental group while these subjects were taught according to the traditional teaching methods in the control group. Rodger Bybee\'s 5E model was used in the constructivist class. As a result of this study it was found that students who have been taught with the constructivist teaching approach were more successful than the ones have been taught with the traditional teaching approach.Yapılandırmacı öğretim yaklaşımı, öğrenme halkası, hücre,biyoloji eğitimi.C onstructivist teaching approach, learning cycle, cell, biology education. Tam Metin

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYGIN, Ö., ATILBOZ, N. G., SALMAN, S. (2006). The Effect of Constructivist Teaching Approach on Learning Biology Subjects The Basic Unit of The Living Things Cell. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 51–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/760285

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alparslan, C., Tekkaya C. ve Geban, Ö. (2003). Using the Conceptual Change Instruction to Improve Learning. Journal of Biological Education, 37(3), 133-137.
  2. Amir, R. ve Tamir, P. (1994). In-depth Analysis of Misconceptions as a Basis for Developing Research-Based Remedial Instruction: The Case of Photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher, 56, 94-100.
  3. Atılboz, N.G. (2004). Lise 1.Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Mitoz ve Mayoz Bölünme Konuları İle İlgili Anlama Düzeyleri ve Kavram Yanılgıları, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(3), 147-157.
  4. Ausubel, D. P. (1968).
  5. Educational Psychology, A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Bybee, R. (1993). Instructional Model for Science Education, in Developing Biological Literacy. Colorado Springs, CO: Biological Sciences Curriculum Studies. Bybee, R. W. (2002).
  6. Scientific Inquiry, Student Learning, and The Science Curriculum. Yayımlandığı Kitap, R. W. Bybee (Editör), Learning Science and The Science of Learning. Arlington, Virginia, NSTA Press.
  7. Christianson, R. G. ve Fisher, K. M. (1999). Comparison of Student Learning About Diffusion and Osmosis in Constructivist and Traditional Classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 21 (6), 687-698.
  8. Cleminson, A. (1990). Establishing and Epistemological Base for Science Teaching in The Light of Contemporary Notions of The Nature of Science and of How Children Learn Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 429-445.
  9. Ekici, G. (1996). Biyoloji Öğretmenlerinin Öğretimde Kullandıkları Yöntemler ve Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi,
  10. Ankara.
  11. Ekici, G. (2001). Biyoloji Öğretmenlerinin Öğretim Yöntemleri Konusundaki Teorik Bilgi Yeterliliklerinin İncelenmesi. Çağdaş Eğitim, 274, 40-46.
  12. Gil-Perez, D. ve Carrascosa-Alis, J. (1994). Bringing Pupils’ Closer to a Scientific Construction of Knowledge: A Permanent Feature in Innovations in Science Teaching. Science Education, 78(3), 301-315.
  13. Karplus, R. ve Thier, H. D. (1967). A New Look at Elementary School Science. Science Curriculum Improvement Study. Chicago: Rand McNally. Karplus, R. (1977). Science Teaching and Development of Reasoning, Journal of Reseearch in Science Teaching, 14,(2), 169-175.
  14. Kılıç B., G. (2001). Oluşturmacı Fen Öğretimi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 1(1), 7-22.
  15. Küçükyılmaz, E. A. (2003). Fen Bilgisi Dersinde Öğrenme Halkası Yaklaşımının Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarılarına ve Hatırlama Düzeylerine Etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora