Journals / Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation Process in English Teaching Program

Pages
38–62
Publication Date
2019-07-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, necessary suggestions were advanced as to the ways to make English language teachers use the alternatives in language assessment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the employment of effective evaluation and assessment techniques to meet the demands of 21st century foreign language instructional practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At first, some common terminology identified in the recent language evaluation literature are clarified elaborately.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, necessary suggestions were advanced as to the ways to make English language teachers use the alternatives in language assessment.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Evaluation · Assesment · English Language Teaching

Özet

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the employment of effective evaluation and assessment techniques to meet the demands of 21st century foreign language instructional practices. A further shift has also taken place to initiate innovative and alternative assessment procedures in the continually changing and highly demanding foreign language teaching contexts. In a sense, this review study mainly focuses its discussion on evaluation process in English language teaching program. At first, some common terminology identified in the recent language evaluation literature are clarified elaborately. Next, an overview of the paradigm shift from traditional assessment to alternative assessment in English as a foreign language (EFL) context is elucidated. In particular, English language program followed in primary and secondary education in Turkey was another major issue to be held in research paper. Therefore, testing techniques for the assessment of language skills are discussed extensively in line with the requirements of English language program. Finally, necessary suggestions were advanced as to the ways to make English language teachers use the alternatives in language assessment.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKAHISKA, D. (2019). Evaluation Process in English Teaching Program. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 38–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/759577

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abbas, Z. (2012). Difficulties in using methods of alternative assessment in teaching from Iraqi instructors’ points of view. AL-Fatih Journal, 48, 23-45.
  2. Abedi, J. (2010). Performance assessments for English language learners. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. Andrade, H. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
  3. Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. Backman, L. O. and Klinghammer, S. J. (2006). Shaping the way we teach English instructor's manual. Washington: University of Oregon. Bayyurt, Y. & Alptekin, C. (2000). EFL syllabus design for Turkish young learners in bilingual school contexts. J. Moon & M. Nikolov (Eds.). Research into teaching English to young learners (pp. 312-322). Pécs: Pécs University Press.
  6. Bayyurt, Y. (2013). Foreign language learning for young learners in 4+4+4 education system. Sarıçoban, A. & Öz, H. (Eds.), Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi İngiliz Dili Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı 1. Yabancı Dil Eğitimi Çalıştayı Bildirileri (Proceedings of the 1st National Workshop on Foreign Language Education) (pp. 115-125). Ankara: Hacettepe University Publishing House. Brindley, G. (2001). Assessment. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to speakers of other languages (pp.137-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. (3rd Edition). New York: Pearson Education, Inc. Brown, H.D. & Abeywickrama, P (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. (2nd Edition). New York: Pearson Education, Inc. Brown, J. D. & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4): 653–675.
  8. Brown, S. (2003). Assessment that works at work. The Newsletter for the Institute of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. 11, 6–7.
  9. Bryant, S. L., & Timmins, A.A. (2002). Portfolio assessment: Instructional guide (Second Edition). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education. Chapelle, C. A. (2010). Technology in language testing [video]. Retrieved from http://languagetesting.info/video/main.html
  10. Ching, Y.-H. & Hsu, Y.-C. (2011). Design-grounded assessment: A framework and a case study of Web 2.0 practices in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educa