Journals / European Journal of Research in Dentistry / 2013 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

-

Comparison of Apical Sealing of Two Canal Sealers between Immediate versus Delayed Post Space Preparation

Pages
20–23
Publication Date
2013-07-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Delayed post space preparation in the gutta-percha/EndoREZ group showed the highest percentage of leakage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The effect of post space preparation on the sealing ability of a root canal filling is important because the sealer is crucial for preserving the apical seal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Forty four single rooted teeth were prepared using the step-back technique and were obturated with combinations of gutta-percha/AH Plus and gutta-percha/EndoREZ using the lateral compaction technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Delayed post space preparation in the gutta-percha/EndoREZ group showed the highest percentage of leakage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:AH Plus · apical sealing · EndoREZ

Abstract

The effect of post space preparation on the sealing ability of a root canal filling is important because the sealer is crucial for preserving the apical seal. The question of how, when, and how much of the gutta-percha should be removed is a debate when preparing a post space. This study is aimed to compare the effect of immediate versus delayed post space preparation on the apical seal using AH Plus and EndoREZ sealers. Forty four single rooted teeth were prepared using the step-back technique and were obturated with combinations of gutta-percha/AH Plus and gutta-percha/EndoREZ using the lateral compaction technique. Four teeth were used as positive/negative controls. After the teeth were divided randomly into six groups, post spaces were prepared either immediately after filling or after storage of the obturated teeth in saline at 37°C for one week. The post space preparation procedure was performed using hot pluggers or Gates Glidden drills leaving a 5 mm of root canal filling in the apical part. Leakage was determined by a computerized fluidfiltration device. Immediate and delayed post space preparation of the gutta-percha/AH Plus groups had mean leakage values of 4.97 µl.cmH2O.min-1.10-4 and 4.94 µl.cmH2O.min-1.10-4, respectively. The respective mean leakage values of immediate and delayed post space preparation of the gutta-percha/EndoREZ groups were 4.97 µl.cmH2O.min-1.10-4 and 5.57 µl.cmH2O.min-1.10-4. The mean leakage value obtained in the positive control group was 398.16 µl.cmH2O.min-1.10-4, whereas there was no fluid filtration in the negative control group. Better sealing was achieved in the guttapercha/AH Plus delayed group in comparison to the other groups. Delayed post space preparation in the gutta-percha/EndoREZ group showed the highest percentage of leakage.

Özet

The effect of post space preparation on the sealing ability of a rootcanal filling is important because the sealer is crucial for preservingthe apical seal. The question of how, when, and how much of thegutta-percha should be removed is a debate when preparing a postspace. This study is aimed to compare the effect of immediate versusdelayed post space preparation on the apical seal using AH Plus andEndoREZ sealers. Forty four single rooted teeth were prepared usingthe step-back technique and were obturated with combinations ofgutta-percha/AH Plus and gutta-percha/EndoREZ using the lateralcompaction technique. Four teeth were used as positive/negativecontrols. After the teeth were divided randomly into six groups,post spaces were prepared either immediately after filling or afterstorage of the obturated teeth in saline at 37°C for one week. Thepost space preparation procedure was performed using hot pluggersor Gates Glidden drills leaving a 5 mm of root canal filling in theapical part. Leakage was determined by a computerized fluidfiltrationdevice. Immediate and delayed post space preparation ofthe gutta-percha/AH Plus groups had mean leakage values of 4.97μl.cmH2O.min-1.10-4 and 4.94 μl.cmH2O.min-1.10-4, respectively.The respective mean leakage values of immediate and delayed postspace preparation of the gutta-percha/EndoREZ groups were 4.97μl.cmH2O.min-1.10-4 and 5.57 μl.cmH2O.min-1.10-4. The meanleakage value obtained in the positive control group was 398.16μl.cmH2O.min-1.10-4, whereas there was no fluid filtration in thenegative control group. Better sealing was achieved in the guttapercha/AH Plus delayed group in comparison to the other groups.Delayed post space preparation in the gutta-percha/EndoREZ groupshowed the highest percentage of leakage.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNGÖR, G., TÜRKAYDIN, D., TARÇIN, B., ÖVEÇOĞLU, H., GÜNDAY, M., ORUÇOĞLU, H. (2013). -. European Journal of Research in Dentistry, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 20–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/757915

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Wu MK, De Gee AJ, Wesselink PR: Leakage of AH26 and Ketac-Endo used with injected warm gutta-percha. J Endod 1997;23:331-336.
  2. Yared GM, Bou Dagher F: Sealing ability of the vertical condensation with different root canal sealers. J Endod 1996;22:6-8.
  3. Abramovitz I, Tagger M, Tamse A, Metzger Z: The effect of immediate vs. delayed post space preparation on the apical seal of a root canal filling: a study in an increased-sensitivity pressure- driven system. J Endod 2000;26:435-439.
  4. Hauman CH, Chandler NP, Purton DG: Factors influencing the removal of posts. Int Endod J 2003;36:687-690.
  5. Karapanou V, Vera J, Cabrera P, White RR, Goldman M: Effect of immediate and delayed post preparation on apical dye leakage using two different sealers. J Endod 1996;22:583-585.
  6. Moshonov J, Slutzky-Goldberg I, Gottlieb A, Peretz B: The effect of the distance between post and residual gutta-percha on the clinical outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod 2005;31:177-179.
  7. Solano F, Hartwell G, Appelstein C: Comparison of apical leakage between immediate versus delayed post space preparation using AH Plus sealer. J Endod 2005;31:752-754. 8. Galen W, Mueller KI: Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth; in Cohen S, Bums RS (eds): Pathways of the pulp. 7th ed. 1998 St. Louis: Mosby. Nagas E, Karaduman E, Sahin C, Uyanık O, Canay S: Effect of timing of post space preparation on the apical seal when using different sealers and obturation techniques. J Dent Sci 2012;1-4. (in press) Serafino C, Gallina G, Cumbo E, Ferrari M: Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97:381-387.
  8. Metzger Z, Abramovitz R, Abramovitz L, Tagger M: Correlation between remaining length of root canal fillings after immediate post space preparation and coronal leakage. J Endod 2000;26:724-728.
  9. Abramovitz I, Lev R, Fuss Z, Metzger Z: The unpredictability of seal after post space preparation: a fluid transport study. J Endod 2001;27:2922 Haddix JE, Mattison GD, Shulman CA, Pink FE: Post preparation techniques and their effects on apical seal. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:5155 Cohen S, Burns RC. Patways of the pulp. 7th ed. 1998 St. Louis: Mosby. Jensen SD, Fischer DJ: Method for filling and sealing a root canal. United States Patent & Trademark Office. Patent Number 6,811,400, November 2, 2004.
  10. Sevimay S, Kalayci A: Evaluation of apical sealing ability and adaptation to de