Journals / European Journal of Research in Dentistry / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Effects of Different Solvents on the Shear Bond Strength of A Nano Additive Composite

Pages
12–17
Publication Date
2020-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The major factor for the decrease of the SBS values is the hydrolysis of resin-dentin interface components. (1)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the most critical steps of the resin restoration technique is adhesion.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: Forty intact human molars were randomly divided in 4 groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The major factor for the decrease of the SBS values is the hydrolysis of resin-dentin interface components. (1)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Adhesive · Solvent · Composite

Abstract

One of the most critical steps of the resin restoration technique is adhesion. Mechanical stress during the restoration can displace or even causes fracture the restoration. Recently, new self-etch adhesive materials can reach optimal shear bond strengths although they aren’t as good as etch and rinse technique, which is gold standard. Their solvent type may classify adhesives into many groups. Aim: This study evaluated the effect of solvents to shear bond strength (SBS) and how they have been effected by the aging procedure; immediate and after thermo-cycle. Material and methods: Forty intact human molars were randomly divided in 4 groups. While 2 groups were restored by using ethanol/water containing adhesive (Tetric N-Bond Universal, Ivoclar, Liechtenstein) the others were restored by using 3 different solvent containing adhesive (Optibond All-in-one, Kerr, USA) which include; acetone, ethanol and water. And both of two groups were subdivided as immediate and after termocycled aging. Tetric N-Ceram (Ivoclar, Liechtenstein) was used as composite in all groups. The immediate groups were tested after 24 hour following the polymerization and the termocycled groups were tested after 10000-termocycled application. P <0.05 significance level was used all hypothesis tests. Result: Immediate and termocycled groups showed statically similar (SBS). But all groups showed lower bond strength after thermo-cycle. Conclusion: While the SBS values weren’t affected by solvent type, the thermo-cycle aging reduced the SBS values in all groups. The major factor for the decrease of the SBS values is the hydrolysis of resin-dentin interface components. (1)

🔖

Cite This Article

DOKUMACIGİL, G., ATALI, P., TOPBAŞI, B. (2020). Effects of Different Solvents on the Shear Bond Strength of A Nano Additive Composite. European Journal of Research in Dentistry, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 12–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/757872

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Hashimoto M., Fujita S., Nagano F., Ohno H. and Endo K. (2010) Ten-years degradation of resin-dentin bonds. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 118, p.404-410. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00744.x 2. Ozcan M., Dundar M. and Comlekoglu ME (2012) Adhesion concepts in dentistry: tooth and material aspects, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 26:24, 2661-2681, DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2012.691038 3. Perdigao J. (2007)
  2. New Developments in Dental Adhesion, The Dental Clinics of North America, 51, 333-357, DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.01.001 4. Tay FR. and Pashley DH. (2009) Biomimetic Remineralization of Resin-bonded Acid-etched Dentin. Journal of Dental Research, 88(8), p.719-724. DOI: 10.1177/0022034509341826 5. Moszner, N., Salz U., and Zimmermann J. (2005) Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel–dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dental Materials,. 21(10): p. 895-910, DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.001 6. Lee SB., Cabezas CG, Kim KM, Kim KN., Kuroda K. (2015) Catechol-Functionalized Synthetic Polymer as a Dental Adhesive to Contaminated Dentin Surface for a Composite Restoration. American Chemical Society Biomacromolecules, 16, p.2265-2275 DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00451 7. Van Landuyt KL., Mine A., De Munck J., Countinho E., Peumans M., Jaezcques S., Lambrechts P and Van Meerbeek B. (2008) Technique sensitivity of water-free one-step adhesives. Dental Materials, 24, p.1258-1267. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.003 8. Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW and Kimmes NS (2009) Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to pre- etched enamel. Dental Materials;25:1187-1194, DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.04.004 9. (Peumans M., De Munck J., Van Landuyt K., Lambrechts P., and Van Meerbeek B. (2007) “Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive,” Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 7–10 10. Faye B., Sarr M., Bane K., Aidara AW., Niang SO., and Kane AW. (2015) One-Year Clinical Evaluation of the Bonding Effectiveness of a One-Step, Self-Etch Adhesive in Noncarious Cervical Lesion Therapy International Journal of Dentistry Volume, p.5 DOI: 10.1155/2015/984065 11. S. Kubo S., H. Yokota H. and Y. Hayashi Y. (2009) “Two-year clinical evaluation of one-step self-etch systems in non-carious cervical lesions,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 149–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.10.008 12. Reis, AF., Oliveira MT., Giannini M., De Goes MF., and Rueggeberg FA. (2003). The effect of organic solvents on one-bottle adhesives' bond strength to