Journals / European Annals of Dental Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

The Prevalance and Radiographic Evaluation of Mandibular Second Premolar Migration: A Retrospective Study

Pages
64–68
Publication Date
2021-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In most of migration case (in 6 case) absence of first permanent molar tooth wasobserved.Conclusion:It is concluded that, if the mandibular second premolar tooth are not located at physiologic position on thedental arch, a panoramic radiographic examination should be recommended to view all the jaws and related structures.Early detection of dental migration may be beneficial to prevent the possible further complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose:To investigate the prevalence and radiographic characteristics of migrated mandibular second premolars byusing panoramic radiography.Materials & Methods:The previously taken 27758 panoramic radiographs were evaluated regarding the determining theprevalence of mandibular second premolar migration.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thirty-six radiographs were excluded from the study due to notproviding the inclusion criteria. 27722 radiographs were evaluated retrospectively by the same operator.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In most of migration case (in 6 case) absence of first permanent molar tooth wasobserved.Conclusion:It is concluded that, if the mandibular second premolar tooth are not located at physiologic position on thedental arch, a panoramic radiographic examination should be recommended to view all the jaws and related structures.Early detection of dental migration may be beneficial to prevent the possible further complications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Impacted tooth · migrated teeth · panoramic radiograph

Abstract

Purpose:To investigate the prevalence and radiographic characteristics of migrated mandibular second premolars byusing panoramic radiography.Materials & Methods:The previously taken 27758 panoramic radiographs were evaluated regarding the determining theprevalence of mandibular second premolar migration. Thirty-six radiographs were excluded from the study due to notproviding the inclusion criteria. 27722 radiographs were evaluated retrospectively by the same operator. In the diagnosisof migrated teeth, radiographic features and demographic characteristics were recorded.Results:Nine migrated second premolar teeth were detected in the evaluation of all the radiographs (%0.03). The meanage of the cases was 37 years. All the migrated teeth were impacted, unilateral and the average distance between normaland migrated location was 41 mm. In most of migration case (in 6 case) absence of first permanent molar tooth wasobserved.Conclusion:It is concluded that, if the mandibular second premolar tooth are not located at physiologic position on thedental arch, a panoramic radiographic examination should be recommended to view all the jaws and related structures.Early detection of dental migration may be beneficial to prevent the possible further complications.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, İ., TÜRKMENOĞLU, A., YÜKSEL, H. T. (2021). The Prevalance and Radiographic Evaluation of Mandibular Second Premolar Migration: A Retrospective Study. European Annals of Dental Sciences, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 64–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/757239

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alves DB, Pedrosa EF, Andreo JC, de Carvalho IM, Rodrigues Ade C. Transmigration of mandibular second premolar in a patient with cleft lip and palate--case report. Journal of applied oral science: revista FOB. 2008;16(5):360-3
  2. Aras MH, Buyukkurt MC, Yolcu U, Ertas U, Dayi E. Transmigrant maxillary canines. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. 2008;105(3):e48-52
  3. Joshi MR. Transmigrant mandibular canines: a record of 28 cases and a retrospective review of the literature. The Angle orthodontist. 2001;71(1):12-22
  4. Shapira Y, Kuftinec MM. Intrabony migration of impacted teeth. The Angle orthodontist. 2003;73(6):738-43; discussion 44
  5. Matteson SR, Kantor ML, Proffit WR. Extreme distal migration of the mandibular second bicuspid. A variant of eruption. The Angle orthodontist. 1982;52(1):11-8
  6. Ely NJ, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. Dental transposition as a disorder of genetic origin. European journal of orthodontics. 2006;28(2):145-51
  7. Sutton PR. Migrating nonerupted mandibular premolars: a case of migration into the coronoid process. Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology. 1968;25(1):87-98
  8. Cryer B. The unpredictable lower second premolar? The Dental practitioner and dental record. 1965;15:458
  9. Aktan AM, Kara S, Akgunlu F, Isman E, Malkoc S. Unusual cases of the transmigrated mandibular canines: report of 4 cases. European journal of dentistry. 2008;2:122
  10. Aydin U, Yilmaz H, Yildirim D. Incidence of canine impaction and transmigration in a patient population. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2004;33(3):164-9
  11. Camilleri S, Scerri E. Transmigration of mandibular canines--a review of the literature and a report of five cases. The Angle orthodontist. 2003;73(6):753-62. 12. van der Linden W, Cleaton-Jones P, Lownie M. Diseases and lesions associated with third molars: Review of 1001 cases. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 1995;79(2):142-5
  12. MENZİLETOĞLU D, IŞIK BK, Alparslan E. INCIDENCE OF MANDIBULAR AND MAXILLARY IMPACTED CANINES TRANSMIGRATION: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. 2018
  13. Türker M, Yücetaş Ş. Ağız, diş, çene hastalıkları ve cerrahisi: Atlas Kitapçılık; 1997. 221-5 p
  14. Peck S. On the phenomenon of intraosseous migration of nonerupting teeth. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics: official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodont