SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Annals of Dental Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Repairability of Different Resin Composites After ph and Thermal Cycling

Güll DİNÇ ATA
Baykal YILMAZ
Esma BALIN
Pages
69–75
Publication Date
2022-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Regardless of the aging method, the overall bond strength of Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill is statistically significantly higher than bond strength of Tetric CAD (p<0,05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different aging methods on repair bond strength of different types of composite resins.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Thirty resin composite blocks (5mm×5mm×4mm) were built up with a nanohybrid universal resin composite and a bulk-fill resin composite according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using a silicone matrix.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Regardless of the aging method, the overall bond strength of Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill is statistically significantly higher than bond strength of Tetric CAD (p<0,05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Air abrasion · Bulk-fill resin composite · Indirect resin composite

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different aging methods on repair bond strength of different types of composite resins. Materials and Methods: Thirty resin composite blocks (5mm×5mm×4mm) were built up with a nanohybrid universal resin composite and a bulk-fill resin composite according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using a silicone matrix. Indirect resin composite blocks were obtained with similar dimensions from prefabricated blocks by microtome. All the samples were air abraded with 50µm aluminum oxide particles. Specimens were then repaired with a nanohybrid resin composite using two step adhesive system. All these specimens were then randomly divided into three groups for aging process (pH cycle, thermal cycle and control group) and tested for shear bond strength. Results were recorded in MPa. Additionally fractured specimens were examined under stereomicroscope to determine the mode of failure. The data was statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni correction test (p<0,05). Results: Statistically significant effect was found on the bond strength values of the aging method and the restorative material (p<0,05). Thermal cycle applied samples showed statistically significantly lower bond strength values than both pH cycle and control group samples (p<0,05). Regardless of the aging method, the overall bond strength of Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill is statistically significantly higher than bond strength of Tetric CAD (p<0,05). Conclusions: Thermal cycle application is an effective aging method and air abrasion has different effects on repair bond strength of the restorative materials according to the content of the materials.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATA, G. D., YILMAZ, B., BALIN, E. (2022). Evaluation of Repairability of Different Resin Composites After ph and Thermal Cycling. European Annals of Dental Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2, 69–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/757206

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. de Gee AF, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. True linear polymerization shrinkage of unfilled resins and composites determined with a linometer. Dent Mater 1993;9(1):11-4.
  2. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66(11):1636-9.
  3. Dietschi D, Scampa U, Campanile G, Holz J. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int 1995;26(2):127-38.
  4. Browne RM, Tobias RS. Microbial microleakage and pulpal inflammation: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2(5):177-83.
  5. Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater 2008;24(11):1501-5.
  6. Olmez A, Oztas N, Bodur H. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 2004;29(6):713-9.
  7. Campodonico CE, Tantbirojn D, Olin PS, Versluis A. Cuspal deflection and depth of cure in resin-based composite restorations filled by using bulk, incremental and transtooth-illumination techniques. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142(10):1176-82.
  8. Flury S, Hayoz S, Peutzfeldt A, Husler J, Lussi A. Depth of cure of resin composites: is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fill materials? Dent Mater 2012;28(5):521-8.
  9. Roggendorf MJ, Kramer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent 2011;39(10):643-7.
  10. Ayar MK, Guven ME, Burduroglu HD, Erdemir F. Repair of aged bulk-fill composite with posterior composite: Effect of different surface treatments. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019;31(3):246-52.
  11. Fugolin APP, Pfeifer CS. New Resins for Dental Composites. J Dent Res 2017;96(10):1085-91.
  12. Visuttiwattanakorn P, Suputtamongkol K, Angkoonsit D, Kaewthong S, Charoonanan P. Microtensile bond strength of repaired indirect resin composite. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9(1):38-44.
  13. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3(1):45-64. Touati B. The evolution of aesthetic restorative materials for inlays and onlays: a review. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996;8(7):657-66; quiz 68. D'Arcangelo C, Vanini L. Effect of three surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2007;9(3):319-26.
  14. Passos SP, Ozcan M, Vanderlei AD, Leite FP, Kimpara ET, Bottino MA. Bond strength dur