Journals / Eurasian Journal of Soil Science / 2014 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Using soil moisture constants and physical properties to predict saturated hydraulic conductivity

Pages
77–81
Publication Date
2014-11-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides soil physical properties, having moisture constants in PTF models showed that saturated Ks values can be predicted more accurately in soils having similar physical boundary conditions such as texture, bulk density etc.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) is an important variable in hydrological cycle processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ks values were determined in 30 different soil samples using constant head permeability method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides soil physical properties, having moisture constants in PTF models showed that saturated Ks values can be predicted more accurately in soils having similar physical boundary conditions such as texture, bulk density etc.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Saturated hydraulic conductivity · pedotransfer model · field capacity

Abstract

Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) is an important variable in hydrological cycle processes. Determination of Ks in soils is a difficult and time consuming process. The objective of this study was to determine Ks in soils by pedotransfer (PTF) models derived using soil moisture constants and physical properties. Ks values were determined in 30 different soil samples using constant head permeability method. According to path analyses results, direct effects of some soil properties on Ks in soils were in the following order; permanent wilting point (PWP) > bulk density (BD) > clay (C) > silt (Si) > field capacity (FC). Soil physical properties generally had the highest indirect effects on Ks through PWP. Prediction of Ks by the second order PTF models was significant using only C, Si and DB (r=0.868**) and using only FC and PWP (r=0.796**) in the models. Using moisture constants with the other soil physical properties in the second order PTF model increased significance level of the relation between predicted and measured values of Ks (r=0.955**). Besides soil physical properties, having moisture constants in PTF models showed that saturated Ks values can be predicted more accurately in soils having similar physical boundary conditions such as texture, bulk density etc.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLSER, C., CANDEMİR, F. (2014). Using soil moisture constants and physical properties to predict saturated hydraulic conductivity. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 77–81. https://ajindex.com/articles/756930

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahuja, I.R., Namey, J.W., Green, R.E., Nielsen, D.R., 1984. Macroporosity to characterize spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and effects of land management. Soil Science Society America Journal 48: 699–702.
  2. Amoozegar, A., Warrick, A.W., 1986. Hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils: Field Methods. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1.Physical and Mineralogical Methods (Ed. A. Klute). SSSA Book Series: 5 (formerly Agronomy Monograph 9). Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 735-768.
  3. Anderson, J.L., Bouma, J., 1973. Relationships between saturated hydraulic conductivity and morphometric data of an argillic horizon. Soil Science Society America Proceedings 37: 408– 413. Basile, A., D’urso, G., 1997. Experimental corrections of simplified methods for predicting water retention curves in clay-loamy soils from particle-size determination. Soil Technology 10:261-272.
  4. Brady, N.C., 1974. The nature and properties of soils. 8th edition. MacMillan Pub.Co., Inc. New York. De Macedo, J.R., Meneguelli, N.A., Filho, T.B.O., Lima, J.A.S., 2002, Estimation of field capacity and moisture retention based on regression analysis involving chemical and physical properties in Alfisols and Ultisols of the state of Rio de Janerio. Communication Soil Science and Plant Analyses 33 (13-14): 2037-2055.
  5. Demiralay, İ., 1993. Toprak fiziksel analiz yöntemleri. Atatürk Univ. Ziraat Fakültesi yayınları. Erzurum, p. 111-120.
  6. Goncalves, M.C., Pereira, L.S., Leij, F.J., 1997. Pedo-transfer Functions for Estimating Unsaturated Hydraulic Properties of Portuguese Soils. European Journal of Soil Science 48: 387–400.
  7. Gülser, C., 2004. Tarla Kapasitesi ve Devamlı Solma Noktası Değerlerinin Toprakların Fiziksel ve Kimyasal Özellikleriyle İlişkili Pedotransfer Eşitliklerle Belirlenmesi. OMU Ziraat Fak. Dergisi, 19(3): 19-23.
  8. Gülser, C., Candemir, F., İç, S., Demir, Z., 2007. Pedotransfer Modellerle İnce Bünyeli Topraklarda Doygun Hidrolik İletkenliğin Tahmini. V. Ulusal Hidroloji Kongresi, Bildiriler Kitabı, 5-7
  9. Eylül, ODTÜ Ankara, p. 563-569.
  10. Hillel, D., 1982. Introduction to soil physics. Academic Press,
  11. Inc. San Dieoga, California. Kacar, B., 1994. Bitki ve toprağın kimyasal analizleri III. Soil Analysis,.Ankara Univ. Ziraat Fakültesi yayınları No:3 Ankara,
  12. Turkey. Klute, A., Dirksen, C., 1986. Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: Laboratory methods. In: SSA-SSSA. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Agronomy monograph no. 9. pp. 687-734.
  13. Mualem, Y., Degan,