Journals / Eurasian Journal of Soil Science / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Spatial variability pattern and mapping of selected soil properties in hilly areas of Hindukush range northern, Pakistan

Pages
355–364
Publication Date
2018-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Linear, Gaussian and exponential models were used for different soil parameter based on nugget, mean prediction error and root mean square standardize prediction error values and maps were developed through extension techniques to cover all the area outside the sampling points.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Soil samples at 0-20 cm depth were collected from major crop areas of Hindukush mountainous range, District Chitral, extreme Northwestern Pakistan, during April 2014 to assess their physico-chemical properties and spatial distribution pattern. 103 soil samples were analyzed and maps were created by geostatistical technique of inverse distance weighting and kriging techniques using GIS and GS win-7 computer software.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The soil texture ranged from silt loam to dominantly sandy loam, slightly acidic to alkaline and moderate to highly calcareous but with no salinity indication.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Linear, Gaussian and exponential models were used for different soil parameter based on nugget, mean prediction error and root mean square standardize prediction error values and maps were developed through extension techniques to cover all the area outside the sampling points.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Spatial variability · soil mapping · kriging

Abstract

Soil samples at 0-20 cm depth were collected from major crop areas of Hindukush mountainous range, District Chitral, extreme Northwestern Pakistan, during April 2014 to assess their physico-chemical properties and spatial distribution pattern. 103 soil samples were analyzed and maps were created by geostatistical technique of inverse distance weighting and kriging techniques using GIS and GS win-7 computer software. The soil texture ranged from silt loam to dominantly sandy loam, slightly acidic to alkaline and moderate to highly calcareous but with no salinity indication. Soil organic matter was higher than 2 % in about 75 % of samples. Soil pH, EC and lime showed slight dependence on each other with r values from 0.4 to 0.5 while OM varied independently as indicated by their lower correlation values. Semivariogram analysis showed that soil pH, lime, OM had strong spatial dependence (nugget-sill ratio, <25%) while silt, sand, EC had moderately (nugget-sill ratio, 25-75%) and clay had weakly distributed in the area. Linear, Gaussian and exponential models were used for different soil parameter based on nugget, mean prediction error and root mean square standardize prediction error values and maps were developed through extension techniques to cover all the area outside the sampling points.

🔖

Cite This Article

AHMAD, M., MUHAMMAD, D., MUSSARAT, M., NASEER, M., KHAN, M. A., KHAN, A. A., SHAFİ, M. İ. (2018). Spatial variability pattern and mapping of selected soil properties in hilly areas of Hindukush range northern, Pakistan. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 355–364. https://ajindex.com/articles/756602

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Baber, K., Khattak, R.H., Hakeem., 2004. Physico-chemical characteristics and fertility status of Gilgit soils. Journal of Agricultural Research 42 (3-4): 305-312.
  2. Bhatti, A.U., Mulla, D.J., Frazier, B.E., 1991. Estimation of soil properties and wheat yields on complex eroded hills using geostatistics and thematic mapper images. Remote Sensing of Environment 37(3): 181-191.
  3. Bouyoucos, G.J., 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science 42(3): 225–230.
  4. Caers, J., 2005,
  5. Petroleum Geostatistics, Society of Petroleum Engineers. 88p. Cambardella, C.A., Moorman, T.B., Parkin, D.L., Karlen, J.M., Novak, Turco, R.F., Konopka, A.E., 1994. Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Science Society American Journal 58 (5): 1501–1511.
  6. Charan, G., Bharti, V.K., Jadhav, S.E., Kumar, S., Acharya., Kumar, P., Gogoi, D., Srivastava, R.B., 2013. Altitudinal variations in soil physico-chemical properties at cold desert high altitude. Journal Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 13(2): 267-277.
  7. Friedman, S.P., 2005. Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: a review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 46(1-3): 45-70.
  8. Hood, R.C., 2001. The effect of soil temperature and moisture on organic matter decomposition and plant growth. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies 37(1): 25-41.
  9. Johnston, A.E., Goulding, K.W.T., Poulton. P.R., 1986. Soil acidification during more than 100 years under permanent grassland and woodland at Rothamsted. Journal of Soil Use Management 2 (1): 3-10.
  10. McLean, E.O., 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties, Second Edition. Number 9, Page, A.L., Keeney, D. R., Baker, D.E., Miller, R.H., Ellis, R. Jr., Rhoades, J.D. (Eds.). ASA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp.199-224.
  11. Mellbye, M., 1988. The effect of surface liming on soil pH and calcium. Handout, Soil Acidity and Liming Symposium, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA. Mulla, D.J., Bhatti, A.U., Kunkel, R., 1990. Methods for removing spatial variability from field research trials. In: Advances in Soil Science, Singh R.P., Parr J.F., Stewart B.A. (Eds.). Vol 13, Springer, New York, USA. pp. 201-213.
  12. Nazif, W., Perveen, S., Saleem, I., 2006. Status of micronutrients in soils of district Bhimber (Azad Jammu and Kashmir). Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science 1(2): 35-40.
  13. Nelson, D.W., Sommers, L.E., 1982. Total carbon, o