Journals / Eurasian Journal of Soil Science / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Assessment of soil quality for vineyard fields: A case study in Menderes District of Izmir, Turkey

Pages
176–183
Publication Date
2019-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Soil quality in a vineyard field should be assessed to reach successful sustainable and precision agricultural practices for high crop production.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the suitable classification of soil quality for vineyard fields of Akçaköy, Çatalca, Efemçukuru, Görece and Yeniköy villages in Menderes district of Izmir-Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In vineyard fields, soil pH gave a positive relation with Ca and significant negative relations with P, Fe, Mn and Zn contents.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Soil quality in a vineyard field should be assessed to reach successful sustainable and precision agricultural practices for high crop production.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Soil quality · grape · yield

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the suitable classification of soil quality for vineyard fields of Akçaköy, Çatalca, Efemçukuru, Görece and Yeniköy villages in Menderes district of Izmir-Turkey. In vineyard fields, soil pH gave a positive relation with Ca and significant negative relations with P, Fe, Mn and Zn contents. Soil organic matter (OM) content had significant positive relations with EC, P, Fe, Mn and Zn and significant negative relations with bulk density and CaCO3 content. Soil quality index values for the vineyard fields varied between 0.38 and 0.85 with a mean of 0.57. Only one of the 28 soil samples taken from different vineyard fields was found in very suitable (S1:1.00-0.75) class, 8 in suitable (S2:0.75-060), 12 in marginal suitable (S3:0.60-0.50) and 7 in non-suitable (N:<0.50) class according to the soil quality index (SQI). Restricting soil factors for vine growth in the fields classified in S2 and S3 classes generally became low pH, low organic matter (OM), P, Fe, Mn, Cu, Mg and K contents than that of suggested levels. In addition to restring factors in S2 and S3 classes, physical properties in soils classified in N class were lower than suggested levels. The SQI values showed significant positive relations with grape yield, soil OM, P, K, Fe, Cu, Mn, Zn contents and significant negative relations with soil pH, exch. Ca and CaCO3 contents. The grape yields had also positive relations with soil OM, Fe, Mn, Zn contents and negative correlations with soil pH and CaCO3 content. Soil quality in a vineyard field should be assessed to reach successful sustainable and precision agricultural practices for high crop production.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, B., GÜLSER, C. (2019). Assessment of soil quality for vineyard fields: A case study in Menderes District of Izmir, Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 176–183. https://ajindex.com/articles/756577

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Aktaş, E., 2002. Bağcılığın Türkiye Ekonomisindeki Yeri. Dünya Gıda Dergisi Sayı 7, s.1-12 [in Turkish]. Arnó, J., Rosell, J.R., Blanco, R., Ramos, M.C., Martínez-Casasnovas, J.A., 2012. Spatial variability in grape yield and quality influenced by soil and crop nutrition characteristics. Precision Agriculture 13(3): 393-410.
  2. Bayram, S., Gülser, F., 2018. Van ilinde domatesin yaygın olarak yetiştirildiği alanların toprak özellikleri ile domates bitkisinin beslenme durumunun belirlenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 28(3): 358-367 [in Turkish]. Belmonte, S.A., Celi, L., Stahel, R.J., Bonifacio, E., Novello, V., Zanini, E., Steenwerth, K.L., 2018. Effect of long-term soil management on the mutual interaction among soil organic matter, microbial activity and aggregate stability in a vineyard. Pedosphere 28(2): 288–298.
  3. Candemir, F. Gülser, C. 2011. Effects of different agricultural wastes on some soil quality indexes in clay and loamy sand fields, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 42(1): 13-28.
  4. Çelik, H., Marasalı, B., Söylemezoğlu, G., Tangolar, S., Gündüz, M., 2000. Bağcılıkta üretim hedefleri. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği V. Teknik Kongresi Bildirileri, 17-21 Ocak 2000,
  5. Ankara, Turkey. s.645-678 [in Turkish]. Çelik, S. 1998. Bağcılık (Ampeloloji), Cilt 1. Trakya Üniversitesi,
  6. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi, Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümü, Anadolo Matbaa Ambalaj San. Tic. Ltd. Şti. Baskısı, Tekirdağ. s 426 [in Turkish]. Day, P.R., 1965. Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I, Black, C.A. (Ed.). Agronomy No. 9. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. p. 545– 566. Demiralay, İ., 1993: Toprak fiziksel analiz yöntemleri. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fakültesi yayınları. Erzurum, Turkey. s.111-120 [in Turkish]. Demir, Z., Gülser, C., 2015. Effects of rice husk compost application on soil quality parameters in greenhouse conditions. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 4(3): 185-190.
  7. Doran, J.W., Parkin, T.B., 1996. Quantitative indicators of soil quality: A minimum data set. In: Methods for assessing soil quality. Doran, J. W., Jones, A.J. (Eds.). Soil Science society of America Special Publication 49: 25–37. Ekberli, İ, Kerimova, E., 2005. Changes in some physico-chemical parameters in irrigated clay soils of Shirvan plain Azerbaijan. Journal of Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University 20(3): 54-59 [in Turkish]. Ekberli, İ., Kerimova, E., 2008. Functional relationships between