Journals / Eurasian Journal of Science Engineering and Technology / 2021 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

CAMERA SELF-CALIBRATION BY USING SfM BASED DENSE MATCHING FOR CLOSE-RANGE IMAGES

Pages
69–82
Publication Date
2021-12-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results shown that self-calibration of loop-close images enables the close results to the pre-calibration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The camera calibration is an important issue that must be overcome to getting metric scene measurement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Today, 3-D point cloud generation and the camera calibration are usually attained simultaneously by using SfM approach photogrammetric evaluation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results shown that self-calibration of loop-close images enables the close results to the pre-calibration.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Camera calibration · Demse matching · Image matching

Abstract

The camera calibration is an important issue that must be overcome to getting metric scene measurement. The imaging parameters are estimated by calibration of the camera. Basically, the camera calibration is performed individually from the photogrammetric evaluation. Today, 3-D point cloud generation and the camera calibration are usually attained simultaneously by using SfM approach photogrammetric evaluation. Stereo images that do not have camera intrinsic parameters can also be evaluated by SfM based photogrammetry. In this study, camera calibration models were investigated for point cloud generation of close-range photogrammetry. The results shown that self-calibration of loop-close images enables the close results to the pre-calibration. Otherwise, the images should be convergent as far as possible or projection-to-sparse point cloud ratio must be raised. The results show that the projection-to-sparse point cloud ratio of 13.22 created high accuracy to self-calibration. Consequently, the pre-calibration requires extra computation and time. However the self-calibration can be implemented for high accuracy measurement subject to convergence imaging or sufficient number of projection.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNTAŞ, C. (2021). CAMERA SELF-CALIBRATION BY USING SfM BASED DENSE MATCHING FOR CLOSE-RANGE IMAGES. Eurasian Journal of Science Engineering and Technology, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 69–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/756341

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. N. Micheletti, J. H. Chandler,, and S. N. Lane, “Structure from motion (SFM) photogram-metry.” In: Clarke LE, Nield JM (Eds.) Geomorphological Techniques (Online Edi-tion), https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/ dspace-jspui/bitstream/2134/17493/3/2.2.2_sfm.pdf, [Access:3 January 2018] (ISSN:2047-0371), 2015
  2. F. He, T. Zhou, W. Xiong, S. M. Hasheminnasab, and A. Habib, “Automated aerial triangulation for UAV-based mapping,” Remote Sensing, vol. 10, no. 12, 1952, 2018. D. Akca, and A. Gruen, “Comparative geometric and radiometric evaluation of mobile phone and still video cameras,” The Photogrammetric Record, vol. 24, no. 127, pp. 217–245, 2009.
  3. S. M. Hasheminasab, T. Zhou, and A. Habib, “GNSS/INS-assisted structure from motion strategies for UAV-based imagery over mechanized agricultural fields,” Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 3, 351, 2020. F. Schaffalitzky, and A. Zisserman, Multi-view matching for unordered image sets, or how do I organize my holiday snaps?,” ECCV 2002, Part I. LNCS 2350, Springer, Heidelberg, 2002.
  4. M. Calonder, V. Lepetit, C. Strecha, and P. Fua, “BRIEF: binary robust independent elementary features,” ECCV 2010, LNCS 6314, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
  5. J. Salvi, X. Armangu, and J. Bat, “A comparative review of camera calibrating methods with accuracy evaluation,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1617–1635, 2002. C. S. Fraser, “Automatic camera calibration in close range photogrammetry,” PE&RS, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 381–388, 2013. R. Hartley, and A. Zisserman, “Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision,” Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2004. D. Griffiths, and H. Burningham, “Comparison of pre-and self-calibrated camera calibration models for UAS-derived nadir imagery for a SfM application,“ Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 215-235, 2019. S. Amelio, and M. L. Brutto, “Close range photogrammetry for measurement of paintings surface deformations,” International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XXXVIII-5/W1, pp. 1–6, 2009.
  6. M. Scaioni, T. Feng, P. Lu, G. Qiao, X. Tong, R. Li, L. Barazzetti, M. Previtali, and R. Roncellaet, “Close-range photogrammetric techniques for deformation measurement: Applications to landslides," In: Scaioni M (eds) Modern Technologies for Landslide Monitoring and Prediction. Springer Natural Hazards. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015. T. Luhmann, “Close range photogrammetry for industrial applications,” ISPRS Journal of