However, in doing so, I will claim that her account of the self begins from an assumption, that is the mind is transparent, in other words, we are completely aware of our desires, motives and inclinations.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Christine Korsgaard claims that Kantian moral law means the law of self-constitution and that unless we fully understand what self-constitution means in Kant, we cannot comprehend Kantian morality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Korsgaard’s idea of self-constitution is based on the idea that the unity of an action and the unity of an agent are not detachable.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, in doing so, I will claim that her account of the self begins from an assumption, that is the mind is transparent, in other words, we are completely aware of our desires, motives and inclinations.
Christine Korsgaard claims that Kantian moral law means the law of self-constitution and that unless we fully understand what self-constitution means in Kant, we cannot comprehend Kantian morality. Korsgaard’s idea of self-constitution is based on the idea that the unity of an action and the unity of an agent are not detachable. In this paper, I will examine Korsgaard’s Kantian notion of the self, and, correspondingly, her idea of a good action. However, in doing so, I will claim that her account of the self begins from an assumption, that is the mind is transparent, in other words, we are completely aware of our desires, motives and inclinations.
Turner, Z. T. (2017). Korsgaard on Self-Constitution. Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, Sayı: 28, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.307938
ARISTOTLE, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. J. A. K. Thomson. London: Penguin, 2004.
KARLSSON, Mikael. ‘Reason, Passion and the Influencing Motives of the Will’, in The Blackwell Guide to Hume’s Treatise, Blackwell, 2005.
KORSGAARD, Christine M. ‘Personal Identity and the Unity of the Agency’: A Kantian Response to Parfit, in Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 18, No: 2, 1989, pp. 101-132.
KORSGAARD, Christine M. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity and Integrity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
KORSGAARD, Christine M., The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
MCDONALD, Fritz J. ‘Chris M. Korsgaard, The Constitution of Agency’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 13, 2010, pp. 235-236.
NIETZSCHE, Friedrich. On the Genealogy of Morality, ed. Keith Ansell-Pearson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
NIETZSCHE, Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage, 1966.
NIETZSCHE, Friedrich. The Gay Science. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage, 1974.
SKORUPSKI, John. ‘Morality as Self-Governance: Has it a Future?’, Utilitas, Vol. 16, No: 2, 2004, pp. 133-145.