Journals / Erciyes Tarım ve Hayvan Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Pollen Morphology and Affecting Factors.

Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) Polen Morfolojisi ve Etkileyen Faktörler

Pages
1–8
Publication Date
2021-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review was made in order to reveal the relationship between the environment and cultural practices during the formation of the pollen used in breeding studies in the chickpea plant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Chickpea, which is an important protein plant for our country, is an important cold season legume grown in a wide area.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Chickpea breeding works under the titles of yield, quality and durability continue in international and national public and private sectors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review was made in order to reveal the relationship between the environment and cultural practices during the formation of the pollen used in breeding studies in the chickpea plant.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Nohut · Cicer arietinum L. · Polen

Abstract

Chickpea, which is an important protein plant for our country, is an important cold season legume grown in a wide area. Chickpea breeding works under the titles of yield, quality and durability continue in international and national public and private sectors. With the classical breeding methods applications, the desired variations cannot be achieved in the chickpea plant, especially since it has a narrow genetic base. For this reason, these variations are tried to be provided with biotechnological applications and purification can be achieved in a short time in terms of desired properties. Anther, pollen and ovary cultures, which are among these biotechnological applications, are used in breeding studies. When the literature is examined, it is seen that the environment (low and high temperature, etc.) and cultural practices (variety and fertilization) have important effects on the development of such generative structures. It increases the chances of success of biotechnological applications in conditions where environmental and cultural application is optimum. This review was made in order to reveal the relationship between the environment and cultural practices during the formation of the pollen used in breeding studies in the chickpea plant.

Özet

Ülkemiz açısından önemli bir protein bitkisi olan nohut geniş bir alanda yetiştirilen önemli bir soğuk mevsim baklagilidir. Verim, kalite ve dayanıklılık başlıkları altında nohut ıslah çalışmaları uluslararası ve ulusal resmi ve özel sektörlerde olmak üzere devam etmektedir. Klasik ıslah yöntemleri uygulamaları ile nohut bitkisinde özellikle de dar genetik tabana sahip olması nedeni ile arzu edilen varyasyonlara ulaşamamaktadır. Bu nedenle biyoteknolojik uygulamalar ile bu varyasyonlar sağlanmaya çalışılmakta ve kısa sürede arzu edilen özellik bakımından saflaştırmalara gidilebilmektedir. Bu biyoteknolojik uygulamalardan olan anter, polen ve yumurtalık kültürü ıslah çalışmalarında kullanılmaktadır. Literatürler incelendiğinde bu tür generatif yapıların gelişiminde çevre (düşük ve yüksek sıcaklık vb.) ve kültürel uygulamalar (çeşit ve gübreleme) önemli etkilerde bulunduğu görülmektedir. Çevre ve kültürel uygulamanın optimum olduğu koşullarda biyoteknolojik uygulamaların başarı şansını arttırmaktadır. Bu derleme, nohut bitkisi özelinde ıslah çalışmalarında kullanılan polenin teşekkülü esnasında çevre ve kültürel uygulamalar ile olan ilişkisini ortaya koymak amacıyla yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPAL, N., BAL, Y. C. (2021). Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Pollen Morphology and Affecting Factors.. Erciyes Tarım ve Hayvan Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/754376

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abdollahi, M. R., and Seguí-Simarro, J. M., 2021. Anther Culture of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). In Doubled Haploid Technology (pp. 289-299).
  2. Humana, New York, NY. Ahmad, F, Gaur, P, Croser, J., 2005, Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), Genetic Resources, Chromosome engineering and crop improvement-Grain Legumes, Vol. 1 Singh, R. and Jauhar, P., (eds), USA, CRC Press, pp. 185-214.
  3. Akçin, A., 1988,
  4. Yemeklik Tane Baklagiller, Selçuk Üniversitesi Yayınları:43, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları:8. 1988,
  5. Konya Berger, J. D., Kumar, S., Nayyar, H., Street, K. A., Sandhu, J. S., Henzell, J. M., and Clarke, H. C. 2012. Temperature-stratified screening of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genetic resource collections reveals very limited reproductive chilling tolerance compared to its annual wild relatives. Field Crops Research, 126, 119-129.
  6. Borg, M., and Twell, D., 2011. Pollen: structure and development. eLS. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0002039.pub2.
  7. Chaturvedi, M., Yunus, D., and Datta, K.,1995. Pollen morphology of Cicer L.‐wild and cultivated annual species. Feddes Repertorium, 106(1‐5), 29-37.
  8. Chhabra, S., Kajal, N., Dhingra, H. R., and Varghese, T. M. 1996. Effect of foliar application of NAA and BAP on in-vitro pollen germination and tube elongation in chickpea raised under saline conditions. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 38, 168-170.
  9. Clarke, H. J., Khan, T. N., and Siddique, K. H., 2004. Pollen selection for chilling tolerance at hybridisation leads to improved chickpea cultivars. Euphytica, 139(1), 65-74.
  10. Croser, J. S., Lulsdorf, M. M., Grewal, R. K., Usher, K. M., & Siddique, K. H., 2011. Isolated microspore culture of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): induction of androgenesis and cytological analysis of early haploid divisions. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 47(3), 357-368.
  11. Devasirvatham, V., Gaur, P. M., Mallikarjuna, N., Raju, T. N., Trethowan, R. M., and Tan, D. K., 2013. Reproductive biology of chickpea response to heat stress in the field is associated with the performance in controlled environments. Field Crops Research, 142, 9-19.
  12. Dhingra, H. R., Kajal, N., Chhabra, S., and Varghese, T. M., 1995. Proline, hydroxyproline, putrescine and pollen tube elongation in chickpea. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 38, 90-91.
  13. Edlund, A. F., Swanson, R., and Preuss, D., 2004. Pollen and stigma structure and function: the role of diversity in pollination. The Plant Cell, 16(suppl_1), S84-S97. El-Adawy, T.A., 2002. Nutritional Composition