Journals / Endoüroloji Bülteni / 2020 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Perineal Prostatectomy: From Past to Today: Open, Perineoscopic, Robotic

Dünden Bugüne Radikal Perineal Prostatektomi: Açık, Perineoskopik, Robotik

Pages
45–52
Publication Date
2020-01-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Randomised controlled trials are needed to become widespread and go ahead.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: We aimed to review radical perineal prostatectomy from past to the latest developments with new surgical platforms in terms of surgical technique.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Conclusion: Radical perineal prostatectomy surgery has an increase in popularity via development of robotic surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Randomised controlled trials are needed to become widespread and go ahead.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Perineal prostatektomi · prostat kanseri · robotik

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to review radical perineal prostatectomy from past to the latest developments with new surgical platforms in terms of surgical technique. Method: A Pubmed research was done for surgical techniques of Radical Perineal Prostatectomy and the evolution with new surgical platforms. Results: Radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) was the first technique defined for localised prostate cancer (Pca) but was replaced by Retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) within years. RPP technique has gaining attention by using Robotic platforms in this era. Conclusion: Radical perineal prostatectomy surgery has an increase in popularity via development of robotic surgery. Randomised controlled trials are needed to become widespread and go ahead.

Özet

Amaç: Radikal perineal prostatektomi ameliyatının başlangıcından günümüze modern cerrahi ekipmanlar ile değişimine gözden geçirmeyi amaçladık. Metod: Radikal Perineal Prostatektomi için cerrahi teknikler ile ilgili özgün makaleler Pubmed ile taranarak, yeni cerrahi platformlar eşliğinde tekniğin gelişimi de gözden geçirildi. Sonuçlar: Lokalize prostat kanserindeki cerrahi tedavilerin en eskilerinden olan RPP ameliyatı, retropubik yöntemin tercih edilmesiyle popülerliğini yitirmiştir. Robotik cerrahinin perineal prostatektomi için kullanılmaya başlaması ile tekrar bu yönteme ilginin arttığı gözlenmiştir. Karar: Özellikle robotik cerrahinin gelişmesi ile radikal perineal prostatektomi ameliyatına kaybolan ilgi tekrar artmaya başlamıştır. Lokalize prostat kanserinde perineal yaklaşımın yaygınlaşabilmesi ve ilerlemesi için randomize kontrollü çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇÖMEZ, Y. İ., SÖKMEN, D., TUĞCU, V. (2020). Perineal Prostatectomy: From Past to Today: Open, Perineoscopic, Robotic. Endoüroloji Bülteni, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 45–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/754159

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424 2. Wallis CJD, Saskir R, Choo R et al (2016) Surgery versus radio- therapy for clinically-localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 70(1):21–30 3. Sanda MG, Cadeddu JA, Kirkby E et al (2018) Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: risk stratification, shared decision-making, and care options. J Urol 199(3):684–690 4. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 71(4): 618–629 5. Young HH (1945) The cure of cancer of the prostate by radical perineal prostatectomy (prostate-seminal vesiculectomy): history, literature and statistics of Young’s operation. J Urol 53:188–256 6. Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JD (1983) Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 4:473 7. Gouley JWS (1885) Some points in the surgery of the hypertrophied prostate. Trans Meet Am Surg Assoc 3:163–192 8. Billroth T. Carcinoma der prostate. Chir Erfahrungen, Zurich 1860-67. Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir Ver Dtsch Z Chir 1869
  2. Bd X, S:548 9. Young HH (1940) A surgeon’s autobiography. Harcourt, Brace and Co, New York, pp 104–134 10. Young HH (1905) Conservative perineal prostatectomy: the results of two years experience and report of seventy-five cases. Ann Surg 41(4):549–557 11. Reiner WB, Walsh PC (1987) An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorini’s plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy: the apical dissection. J Urol 138(3):543–550 12. Saito S, Murakami G (2003) Radical perineal prostatectomy: a novel approach for lymphadenectomy from perineal incision. J Urol 170:1298–1300 13. Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L et al (2000) Remote laparo- scopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case. Prog Urol 10:520–523 14. Binder J, Kramer W (2001) Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 87:408–410 15. Lowrance WT, Eastham JA, Savage C et al (2012) Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologist in the United States. J Urol 187:2087–2092 16. Albayrak S, Horuz R, Göktaş C, Cangüven Ö, Çetinel C. Radical perineal prostatectomy: our experiences on 40 cases. Turk J Urol 2007
  3. Resnick MI (2003) Radical per