Journals / ELT Research Journal / 2014 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

The effects of language transfer in Turkish EFL learners

Pages
70–83
Publication Date
2014-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results revealed significant evidence for syntactic transfer due to different word order patterns between the two languages.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Language transfer is defined as the influence resulting from similarities and differences between the target language and any other language that has been previously (and perhaps imperfectly) acquired (Odlin, 1989).
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to this view, native language (NL) affects second language and it was the source of error in production and/or reception (Gass & Selinker, 2001).The present study aims to investigate the transfer effects of Turkish (L1) learners of English (L2).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results revealed significant evidence for syntactic transfer due to different word order patterns between the two languages.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:language transfer · contrastive analysis hypothesis (CAH) · word order

Abstract

Language transfer is defined as the influence resulting from similarities and differences between the target language and any other language that has been previously (and perhaps imperfectly) acquired (Odlin, 1989). The notion of transfer was raised with the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis (CAH) by the behaviorist psychologists. According to this view, native language (NL) affects second language and it was the source of error in production and/or reception (Gass & Selinker, 2001).The present study aims to investigate the transfer effects of Turkish (L1) learners of English (L2). Specifically, the present study examines the acquisition of word order (verb placement) in Turkish EFL learners. The participants were 19 Turkish EFL learners enrolled in a Language Preparatory Program at a private university in Turkey. Data came from picture description and grammaticality judgment tasks. The results revealed significant evidence for syntactic transfer due to different word order patterns between the two languages.

🔖

Cite This Article

MEDE, E., TUTAL, C., AYAZ, D., ÇALIŞIR, K., AKIN, Ş. (2014). The effects of language transfer in Turkish EFL learners. ELT Research Journal, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 70–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/754056

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bannai, M. (2008). L2 knowledge of verb placement by Japanese learners of English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46(1), 1-29.
  2. Bentzen, K. (2013). Cross-linguistic influence and structural overlap affecting English verb placement. Retrieved on September 30, 2014 from http://conference.sol.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/up/engelska/ENGB02/resources/GLO W36/Acquisition/Crosslinguistic_influence_and_structural_overlap_affecting_English_ verb_placement.pdf Blom, W. B. T., & Polisenska, E. (2006). Verbal inflection and verbal placement in first and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. Dulay, H. C. & Mary, K. B. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24(1), 37–53.
  3. Ellis, R. (1994). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Fisiak, J. (Ed.) (1981). Contrastive analysis and the language teacher. Oxford: The Pergamon Institue of English. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hoffman, B. (1992). A CCG approach to free word order languages. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of ACL, Student Session. Jansen, B., Laleman J., & Muysken, P. (1981). The alternation hypothesis: Acquisition of Dutch word order by Turkish and Moroccan foreign workers. Language Learning, 31, 315-36.
  5. Lado, R. (1960). Linguistics across culture. MI: The University of Michigan Press.
  6. McDaniel, D., & Cairns, H. S. (1996). Eliciting judgments of grammaticality and reference. In D. McDaniel, C. McKee & H.S. Cairns (Eds.), Methods for assessing children’s syntax (pp. 233-254).
  7. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  8. Mede, E. (2011). The acquisition of word order (verb placement) in an adult Serbo-Croatian- Turkish bilingual. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 134–137.
  9. Müller, N. (1998). Transfer in bilingual first language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 151–171.
  10. Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Onar, P. (2008). Language transfer in English word order acquisition of Turkish – Dutch bilinguals is it from their L1 or L2? Unpublished MA thesis, Utrecht University, the Nederland. Oxenden, C., & Latham-Koenig, C. (2012). New English file: Elementary (Teacher’s Book). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Rustipa, K. (2011). Contrastive analysis, error analysis, interlanguage and the implication to language teaching. Rag