Journals / ELT Research Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Language Minority Students’ Status: One Large Scale Exam and Two Countries

Pages
170–189
Publication Date
2019-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although these factors are controlled, the Canadian immigrant students outperform; therefore, some remarks for education policies in bi/multilingual countries can be made.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Educational policies are dynamic and can be revised when needed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to compare the success of the immigrant students in reading skills in both countries as well as their sense of belonging and their parents’ education by utilizing PISA-2015 data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although these factors are controlled, the Canadian immigrant students outperform; therefore, some remarks for education policies in bi/multilingual countries can be made.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:PISA · language minority students · Canada

Abstract

Educational policies are dynamic and can be revised when needed. In order to analyze how successful a country is, what their rank is among others and what a country needs to improve, international exams, like PISA, are conducted by authorities. Also, there are many countries with a large immigrant population. In this regard, the educational policies should include some regulations for immigrant students’ education. Canada and Belgium have been chosen as participant countries of this study since they are bi/multilingual countries. Even though they are similar to each other with their immigrant population, the education policies in these countries differ. This study aims to compare the success of the immigrant students in reading skills in both countries as well as their sense of belonging and their parents’ education by utilizing PISA-2015 data. The results display that the immigrant students in Canada have outperformed their peers in Belgium. Furthermore, the immigrant parents in Canada are more educated than those in Belgium, and Canadian immigrant students show lower sense of belonging to school when compared to the peers in Belgium. Although these factors are controlled, the Canadian immigrant students outperform; therefore, some remarks for education policies in bi/multilingual countries can be made.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTURAN, T., UYAR, G., AYAZ, A. D. (2019). Language Minority Students’ Status: One Large Scale Exam and Two Countries. ELT Research Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 170–189. https://ajindex.com/articles/753974

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ağırdağ, O. (2009). All languages welcomed here. Educational Leadership, 66, 20–25.
  2. Ağırdağ, O. (2010). Exploring bilingualism in a monolingual school system: insights from Turkish and native students from Belgian schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31, 307–321.
  3. Ağırdağ, O. (2014). The long-term effects of bilingualism on children of immigration: Student bilingualism and future earnings. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17(4), 449-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.816264.
  4. Ağırdağ, O., Van Avermaet, P., & Van Houtte, M. (2013). School segregation andmath achievement: A mixed-method study on the role of self-fulfilling prophecies. Teachers College Record; 115(3), 1-50.
  5. Ağırdağ, O. and Vanlaar, G. (2016). Does more exposure to the language of instruction lead to higher academic achievement? A cross-national examination. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1 –15. August, D. & Shanahan, T. (2010). Response to a review and update on developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language minority children and youth. Journal of literacy research, 42, 341-348.
  6. Baker, D. P., & Stevenson, D. L. (1986). Mothers' strategies for children's school achievement: Managing the transition to high school. Sociology of education. Sociology of education, 59, 156-166.
  7. Becher, R. M. (1984). Parent involvement: A review of research and principles of successful practice. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education. Bialystok, E. (1988). Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 560–567.
  8. Bialystok, E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70, 636–644.
  9. Bortoli, L. D. (2018). PISA Australia in Focus Number 1. Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd. Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual review of psychology, 53, (1), 371-399.
  10. Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Bilingual Education Paper Series, 3, 1–69.
  11. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Bilingual education and bilingualism 23. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Cummins, J. (2008). Essay review [Review of the book Where immigrant students succeed: A comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003, by P. Stanat & G. Christensen