SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekonomi-tek / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Political Economy of Developmental State

Kalkınmacı Devletin Ekonomi Politiği

Muhteşem KAYNAK
Pages
59–99
Publication Date
2020-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, it is attempted to explain the contradictions that developmental states take place in theory and practice, and to state that they have oppressive and exploitative nature in the capitalist context.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The state has always been a leading actor during the development process of all developed economies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Newly industrialized countries following Second World War particularly in East and Southeast Asia such as South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong, as well as Japan, are all studied using the concept of “Developmental State”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, it is attempted to explain the contradictions that developmental states take place in theory and practice, and to state that they have oppressive and exploitative nature in the capitalist context.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kalkınmacı Devlet · Ekonomik Kalkınma · Ekonomi Politik

Abstract

The state has always been a leading actor during the development process of all developed economies. Newly industrialized countries following Second World War particularly in East and Southeast Asia such as South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong, as well as Japan, are all studied using the concept of “Developmental State”. The scope of the paper is to criticize this literature from a political economic perspective. Thus, it is attempted to explain the contradictions that developmental states take place in theory and practice, and to state that they have oppressive and exploitative nature in the capitalist context.

Özet

Tüm gelişmiş ülkelerin kalkınma süreçlerinde devlet önemli bir aktör olarak her zaman ön planda yer almıştır. İkinci Dünya Savaşı’ndan sonra özellikle Doğu ve Güneydoğu Asya’da ortaya çıkan Yeni Sanayileşen Ülkelerden G. Kore, Tayvan, Singapur ve Hong Kong’un yanısıra Japonya, “kalkınmacı devletler” kavramı altında yeni incelemelere tabi tutulmuşlardır. Bu çalışmanın amacı ise, sözkonusu incelemeleri ekonomi politik açıdan eleştirel bir şekilde değerlendirmektir. Böylece, kalkınmacı devletlerin teoride ve pratikte yer aldığı çelişkiler açıklanmaya, kapitalist bağlamda baskıcı ve sömürücü niteliklere sahip oldukları belirtilmeye çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYNAK, M. (2020). Political Economy of Developmental State. Ekonomi-tek, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 59–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/753659

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Abramovitz, M. (1986), “Catching Up, Forging Ahead and Falling Behind,” Journal of Economic History, 46(2): 385-406.
  2. Acemoğlu, D. ve J. A. Robinson (2019), The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty, Penguin Press,
  3. New York. Akerlof, G. A. (1970), “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3): 488-500.
  4. Akkemik, K. A. (2019), Industrial Development in East Asia: A Comparative Look at Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore. Amsden, A. H. (1989), Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, Oxford University Press,
  5. Oxford. Amsden, A. H. (2001), The Rise of “the Rest”: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies, Oxford University Press,
  6. New York. Bairoch, P. (1993),
  7. Economics and World History, Myths and Paradoxes, The University of Chicago Press,
  8. Chicago. Bishop, M. L. ve A. Payne (2018), “Introduction: Why Revisit the Developmental State?” Bishop, Matthew L. et al, eds., içinde, Revisiting the Developmental State, SPERI (Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute), Paper No. 43. Blumenthal, T. ve Chung H. L. (1985), “Development Strategies of Japan and the Republic of Korea: A Comparative Study,” The Developing Economies, 23(3): 221-235.
  9. Brautigam, D., L. Rakner ve S. Taylor (2002), “Business Associations and Growth Coalitions in Sub-Saharan Africa,” The Journal of Modern African Studies, 40(4): 519-547.
  10. Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2019), “Models of the Developmental State,” CEPAL Review, No: 128: 35-47.
  11. Chang, D. (2003a),
  12. Demystifying the Developmental State, University of Warwick, PhD Thesis. Chang, H. J. (1999), “The Economic Theory of the Developmental State,” Meredith Woo-Cumings, ed. içinde, The Developmental State, Cornell University Press,
  13. Ithaca, New York. Chang, H. J. (2002), Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective, Anthem Press,
  14. London. Chang, H. J. (2003b): “The East Asian Development Experience,” Ha-Joon Chang, ed. içinde, Rethinking Development Economics, Anthem Press,
  15. London. Chang, H. J. (2010), “How to ‘Do’ a Developmental State: Political, Organizational, and Human Resource Requirements for the Developmental State,” Omano Edigheji, ed. içinde, Constructing a Democratic Developmental State in South Africa – Potentials and Challenges, Human Science Research Council Press,
  16. Cape Town. Cheung, A. B. L. (2000), “New Interventionism in the Making: