Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A PANEL CAUSALITY ANALYSIS FOR OECD COUNTRIES

FİNANSAL GELİŞME VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME: OECD ÜLKELERİ ÖRNEĞİNDE PANEL NEDENSELLİK ANALİZİ

Pages
471–484
Publication Date
2019-08-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings support the feedback hypothesis for OECD countries in financial development and economic growth relationship.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The relationship between financial development and economic growth is expressed by different hypotheses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Demand pressure which is caused by increased income as a conclusion of growth may lead to the financial development.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings support the feedback hypothesis for OECD countries in financial development and economic growth relationship.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Finansal Gelişme · Büyüme · Panel Nedensellik

Abstract

The relationship between financial development and economic growth is expressed by different hypotheses. Demand pressure which is caused by increased income as a conclusion of growth may lead to the financial development. This argument is known as demand-following hypothesis. On the contrary, the supply-leading hypothesis indicates that financial development leads to increased efficiency and therefore promotes growth. The feedback hypothesis implies that the causal relationship between financial development and growth is bidirectional, whereas there is no causality in the neutral hypothesis. This study examines the relationship between financial development and economic growth in the case of 34 OECD countries. For this purpose we estimate heterogeneous VAR model and conduct Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) causality test which allows for dependency in panel units and heterogeneity of parameters. Findings of causality test showed that there is a bidirectional relationship. In VAR model that estimated for growth, parameters of lagged financial development were found to be significant for 11 countries. In financial development VAR model, lagged growth variable coefficients of 17 countries were significant. These findings support the feedback hypothesis for OECD countries in financial development and economic growth relationship.

Özet

Finansal gelişme ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi farklı hipotezlerle ifade edilmektedir. Ekonomik büyüme ve gelir düzeyindeki artışın neden olduğu talep baskısı finansal sistemin gelişmesine neden olabilir. Bu görüş talep takipli hipotez olarak bilinmekte-dir. Bunun aksine, arz öncüllü hipotez finansal gelişmenin kaynak dağılımında etkinlik artışı sağlamakla büyümeye neden olduğunu öngörür. Geri besleme hipotezi finansal gelişme ve büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisinin çift yönlü olduğunu ifade ederken, yansızlık hipotezinde ise herhangi bir nedensellik ilişkisi söz konusu değildir. Bu çalışmada finansal gelişme ile ekonomik büyüme arasın-daki ilişki 34 OECD üyesi ülke örneğinde incelenmiştir. Çalışmada panel birimleri arasında bağımlılığa ve hete-rojenliğe izin veren Dumitrescu ve Hurlin (2012) panel nedensellik analiz yapılmış ve heterojen VAR modeli tahmin edilmiştir. Nedensellik testi sonuçları finansal gelişme ve büyüme arasında çift yönlü ilişki olduğunu göstermiştir. Büyüme için tahmin edilen VAR modelinde 11 ülke için gecikmeli finansal gelişme değişkenine ait parametreler anlamlı bulunmuştur. Finansal gelişme VAR modellerinde ise büyüme değişkeni gecikmeli değerine ait katsayıların 17 ülke için anlamlı olduğu görülmüştür. Bu sonuçlar OECD ülkelerinde finansal gelişme ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisinde geri besleme hipotezinin geçerli olduğunu desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AĞAZADE, S., KARAKAYA, A. (2019). FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A PANEL CAUSALITY ANALYSIS FOR OECD COUNTRIES. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 471–484. https://ajindex.com/articles/75334

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. AGBETSIAFA, D. (2004), The Finance Growth Nexus: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa, Savings and Development, 28(3), 271-288.
  2. AĞAYEV, S. (2012), Geçiş Ekonomilerinde Finansal Gelişme ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi, Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 32(1), 155-164.
  3. AĞAYEV, S. (2013), Geçiş Ekonomileri Örneğinde Finansal Gelişmenin Gelir Düzeyine Etkisi, Ege Akademik Bakış, 13(1), 125-136.
  4. ADUSEI, M. (2012), Financial Development and Economic Growth: Is Schumpeter Right?, British Journal of Economics, Management &Trade, 2(3), 265-278.
  5. AKINCI, G.Y., AKINCI, M., ve YILMAZ, Ö. (2014), Financial Development-Economic Growth Nexus: A Panel Data Analysis upon OECD Countries, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 55(1), 33-50.
  6. AKIMOV, A., WIJEWEERA, A., ve DOLLERY, B. (2009), Financial Development and Economic Growth: Evidence from Transition Economies, Applied Financial Economics, 19(12), 999-1008.
  7. APERGIS, N., FILIPPIDIS, I., ve ECONOMIDOU, C. (2007), Financial Deepening and Economic Growth Linkages: A Panel Data Analysis, Review of World Economics, 143(1), 179-198.
  8. AYDIN, M., ve MALCIOĞLU, G. (2016), Financial Development and Economic Growth Relationship: The Case of OECD Countries, Journal of Applied Research in Finance and Economics, 2(1), 1-7.
  9. BALTAGI, B.H. (2005),
  10. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Third Edition, London: John Wiley&Sons Ltd. BANGAKE, C., ve EGGOH, J. C. (2010), Finance-Growth Link in OECD Countries: Evidence from Panel Causality and Cointegration Test, Brussels Economic Review, 53(3/4), 375-392.
  11. BECSI, Z., ve WANG, P. (1997),
  12. Financial Development and Growth, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review, 4, 46-62.
  13. BENCIVENGA, V.R., ve SMITH, B. D. (1991), Financial Intermediation and Endogenous Growth, The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 195-209.
  14. BREITUNG, J. (2000), The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data, Advances in Econometrics, 15, 161-178. CALDERÓN, C., ve LIU, L. (2003), The Direction of Causality between Financial Development and Economic Growth, Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 321-334.
  15. CAPORALE, G.M., RAULT, C., SOVA, R., ve SOVA, A. (2009), Financial Development and Economic Growth: Evidence from Ten New EU Members, Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin, No: 940. CAPORALE, G.M., ve SPAGNOLO, N. (2011), Stock Market and Economic Growth: Evidence from Three CEECs, Brunel University London Department of Economics and Finance Working Paper Series, No: 11-16.
  16. CAPASSO, S. (2003),
  17. Financial Markets, Development and Econom