Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

THE EFFECTS OF ECONOMIC COMPLEXITY, EXPORT AND FIXED CAPITAL INVESTMENTS ON INCOME PER CAPITA: THE CASE OF G-20 COUNTRIES

EKONOMİK KOMPLEKSİTE, İHRACAT VE SABİT SERMAYE YATIRIMLARININ KİŞİ BAŞINA DÜŞEN GELİR ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: G-20 ÜLKELERİ ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
393–407
Publication Date
2019-08-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Brazil is the only country differentiates from the other countries in the sense of having the increasing export share of primary products (raw materials and intermediate goods) while having decreasing export share of manufactured products and also in the sense of having positive significant relationship between the economic complexity level and per capita income.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In today's world economy, where the composition of exports has gained importance rather than the size of export volumes of countries, how sophisticated products a country produces and exports indicates the complexity level of that country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the effects of economic complexity index, export and gross fixed capital formation variables on per capita income are analyzed for 18 countries in the G-20 community.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Brazil is the only country differentiates from the other countries in the sense of having the increasing export share of primary products (raw materials and intermediate goods) while having decreasing export share of manufactured products and also in the sense of having positive significant relationship between the economic complexity level and per capita income.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kişi başı GSYH · Ekonomik kompleksite · Yapısal dönüşüm

Abstract

In today's world economy, where the composition of exports has gained importance rather than the size of export volumes of countries, how sophisticated products a country produces and exports indicates the complexity level of that country. In this study, the effects of economic complexity index, export and gross fixed capital formation variables on per capita income are analyzed for 18 countries in the G-20 community. The findings of the study reveals positive impact of economic complexity index on per capita income for Brazil, China, Germany, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, Turkey and the US while revealing negative impact for Argentina, Australia, Canada, Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom. Brazil is the only country differentiates from the other countries in the sense of having the increasing export share of primary products (raw materials and intermediate goods) while having decreasing export share of manufactured products and also in the sense of having positive significant relationship between the economic complexity level and per capita income.

Özet

Ülkelerin ihracat hacimlerinin büyüklüğünden ziyade, ihracatın kompozisyonunun önem kazandığı günümüz dünya ekonomisinde, ülkelerin ne denli sofistike ürünler ürettikleri ve ihraç ettikleri o ekonominin kompleksite derecesini göstermektedir. Bu çalışmada G-20 topluluğundaki 18 ülke çerçevesinde; ekonomik kompleksite indeksi, ihracat ve sabit sermaye yatırımı değişkenlerinin kişi başına düşen gelir üzerindeki etkisi incelenmektedir. Analiz sonuçları Brezilya, Çin, Almanya, Endonezya, Japonya, Meksika, Güney Kore, Türkiye ve ABD için ekonomik kompleksite indeksinin kişi başına düşen gelir üzerinde pozitif etkiye sahip olduğu bir ilişki ortaya koyarken; Arjantin, Avustralya, Kanada, Suudi Arabistan ve Birleşik Krallık için negatif etkiye sahip bir ilişki ortaya koymaktadır. Brezilya hammadde ve ara mal niteliğindeki birincil ürünlerde ihracat payı artarken mamul ürünlerde ihracat payı azalan, buna karşılık ekonomik kompleksite düzeyi ile kişi başına düşen gelir arasında pozitif anlamlı ilişki elde edilen ve böylece diğer ülkelerden ayrışan tek ülke olma özelliği taşımaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYYİĞİT, S., TOPUZ, H., ÖZEKİCİOĞLU, H. (2019). THE EFFECTS OF ECONOMIC COMPLEXITY, EXPORT AND FIXED CAPITAL INVESTMENTS ON INCOME PER CAPITA: THE CASE OF G-20 COUNTRIES. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 393–407. https://ajindex.com/articles/75329

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. AGENOR, P. R. ve CANUTO, O. (2015),
  2. Middle-Income Growth Traps, Research in Economics, 69, 641-660.
  3. BREUER, J.B., MCNOWN, R. ve WALLACE, M. (2002), Series-specific Unit Root Tests with Panel Data, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64 (5), 527-546.
  4. CHERIF, R. ve HASANOV, F. (2015), The Leap of the Tiger: How Malaysia Can Escape the Middle-Income Trap, IMF Working Paper, No: WP/15/131. COŞKUN, N., LOPCU, K. ve TUNCER, İ. (2018), The Economic Complexity Approach to Development Policy: Where Turkey Stands in Comparison to OECD plus China?, Proceedings of Middle East Economic Association, 20 (1), 112-124.
  5. DEMİR, O. (2017), Does High Tech Exports Really Matter for Economic Growth?, Online Academic Journal of Information Technology, 9 (30), 43-54.
  6. FELIPE, J., ABDON, A. ve KUMAR, U. (2012), Tracking the Middle-income Trap: What Is It, Who Is in It, and Why?, Levy Economics Institute Working Paper, No: 715. FELIPE, J. (2012), Tracking the Middle-Income Trap: What is It, Who is in It, and Why?, Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series, No. 307. FERRAZ, D., H. F.MORALLES, J.S.CAMPOLI, F.C.RIBERIO de OLIVIERA ve D. APARECIDA do NASCIMENTO REBELATTO. (2018), Economic Complexity and Human Development: DEA Performance Measurement in Asia and Latin America, Complexidade Economica e Desenvolvimento Humano: uma analize a partir do DEA. FORTUNATO, P. ve RAZO, C. (2014),
  7. Export Sophistication, Growth and the Middle-Income Trap, Transforming Economies – Making Industrial Policy Work for Growth, Jobs and Development, ILO, 267-287.
  8. GARRETT, G. (2004), Globalization’s Missing Middle, 14.08.2018 tarihinde https://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/globalizations-missing-middle adresinden alındı. HARTMANN, D., GUEVARA, M.R., FIGUEROA, C.J., ARISTARAN, M. ve HIDALGO, C.A., (2017),
  9. Linking Economic Complexity, Institutions and Income Inequality, World Development 93, s.75-93.
  10. HAUSMANN, R., HIDALGO, C.A., BUSTOS, S., COSCIA, M., CHUNG, S., JIMENEZ, J., SIMOES, A. ve YILDIRIM, M.A. (2011). The Atlas of Economic Complexity Mapping Paths to Prosperity, Center for International Development at Harvard University, 26.12.2018 tarihinde https://atlas.media.mit.edu/static/pdf/atlas/AtlasOfEconomicComplexity_Part_I.pdf adresinden alındı. HIDALGO, C. A. (2009), The Dynamics of Economic Complexity and the Product Space over a 42 Year Period, Center for International Development at Harvard University, CID Working Paper, No: 189. HIDALGO, C. A., ve HAUSMANN, R. (2009), The building