Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

A LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS ON INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE OF HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND RESEARCH TRENDS

İNSAN KAYNAKLARI YÖNETİMİNİN ENTELEKTÜEL YAPISI ÜZERİNE BOYLAMSAL BİR ANALİZ: TEORİK TEMELLER VE ARAŞTIRMA EĞİLİMLERİ

Pages
796–814
Publication Date
2019-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that sociology-based organizational theories further affected the field in the 1990s.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the intellectual structure of the field of human resources management (HRM) has been investigated and new theoretical foundations and research trends that will contribute to the development of the field have been proposed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results show that sociology-based organizational theories further affected the field in the 1990s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, research trends in the future of the field could be stated as the effects of industry 4.0, e-HRM, and artificial intelligence studies on human resource management.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İnsan kaynakları yönetimi · teorik temeller · araştırma eğilimleri

Abstract

In this study, the intellectual structure of the field of human resources management (HRM) has been investigated and new theoretical foundations and research trends that will contribute to the development of the field have been proposed. Content analysis was used in the research and a longitudinal analysis was performed. The results show that sociology-based organizational theories further affected the field in the 1990s. In the 2000s, it was determined that the dominant theories in the field were human capital theory from economy discipline, social exchange theory from sociology discipline, and resource based view from strategic management discipline. In the 2010s, human capital theory from economy discipline, social capital theory from sociology discipline, and resource based view from strategic management discipline had widespread effects in the field. Finally, strategic human resource management (SHRM), outcomes and human resources practices were determined as the research trends that have been most effective on the field from the 1990s to the present. However, the context research trend was less effective in the field compared to other research trends. As a result, it can be stated that future researches that want to contribute to the field of human resources management can benefit from theory of the growth of the firm, Austrian school of economics, strategy as a practice and new institutional economies. In addition, research trends in the future of the field could be stated as the effects of industry 4.0, e-HRM, and artificial intelligence studies on human resource management.

Özet

Bu çalışmada insan kaynakları yönetimi alanının entelektüel yapısı araştırılarak, alanın gelişimine katkı sağlayacak yeni teorik temeller ve araştırma eğilimleri önerilmiştir. Araştırmada içerik analizinden faydalanılmış ve boylamsal bir analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular, 1990’lı yıllarda sosyoloji temelli örgüt teorilerinin alanı daha fazla etkilediğini göstermektedir. 2000’li yıllarda alandaki hâkim teoriler ekonomi disiplininden insan sermayesi teorisi, sosyoloji disiplininden sosyal değişim teorisi ve stratejik yönetim disiplininden kaynaklara dayalı yaklaşım olarak tespit edilmiştir. 2010’lu yıllarda ise ekonomi disiplininden insan sermayesi teorisi, sosyoloji disiplininden sosyal sermaye teorisi ve stratejik yönetim disiplininden kaynaklara dayalı yaklaşımın alanda yaygın etkileri olduğu bulunmuştur. Son olarak stratejik insan kaynakları yönetimi, çıktılar (outcomes) ve insan kaynakları uygulamaları 1990’lı yıllardan günümüze alana en fazla hakim olan araştırma trendleri olarak tespit edilmiştir. Ancak bağlama (context) yönelik araştırmaların ise diğer araştırma trendlerine göre alandaki etkisinin sınırlı olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Sonuç olarak insan kaynakları yönetimi alanına katkı sağlamak isteyen gelecekteki araştırmaların firmanın büyüme teorisi, Avusturyan ekonomi okulu, uygulama olarak strateji çalışmaları ve yeni kurumsal ekonomilerden yararlanabileceği ifade edilebilir. Ayrıca alanın gelecekte yönelebileceği araştırma trendlerinin, endüstri 4.0, e-HRM ve yapay zeka çalışmalarının insan kaynakları yönetimi üzerindeki etkileri olacağı belirtilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAĞIŞ, M., KARAGÜZEL, E. S., KRYEZIU, L., ARDIÇ, K. (2019). A LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS ON INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE OF HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND RESEARCH TRENDS. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 796–814. https://ajindex.com/articles/75312

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. ACEDO, F. J., BARROSO C., ve GALAN J. L. (2006), The Resource‐Based Theory: Dissemination and Main Trends, Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 621-636.
  2. AMABILE, T. M. (1983), The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.
  3. AMABILE, T. M. (1996), Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity, Hachette UK. ARGYRIS, C., AND SCHÖN D. A. (1978),
  4. Organizational Learning, Readings, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. BAĞIŞ, M., ve HIZIROĞLU M. (2018), Stratejik Yönetim'in Kaynaklara Dayalı Yaklaşımı: Ekonomik, Sosyolojik, Psikolojik Temeller, Ankara:
  5. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. BANDURA, A. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice-Hall, Inc. BARNEY, J. B., KETCHEN D. J., ve WRIGHT M. (2011), The Future of Resource-Based Theory Revitalization or Decline, Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299-1315.
  6. BARNEY, J. B. (1991), Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1) 99-120.
  7. BARNEY, J. B., and ARIKAN A. M. (2001), The Resource-Based View: Origins and Implications, In Handbook of Strategic Management, Editors: HITT, M. A., FREEMAN R. E., HARRISON J. S., (s. 124-188),
  8. Blackwell Publishers Ltd. BECKER, G. S. (1964),
  9. Human Capital, A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special References to Education, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  10. BLAU, P. M. (1964),
  11. Exchange and Power in Social Life, New Brunswick (U.S.A) and London (U.K.): Transaction Publishers.
  12. BOWEN, G. A. (2009), Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method, Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
  13. BOXALL, P., ve PURCELL J. (2000), Strategic Human Resource Management: Where Have We Come From and Where Should We Be Going?, International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(2), 183-203.
  14. BOXALL, P. F., PURCELL J., ve WRIGHT P. M. (2007), The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management, England: Oxford University Press.
  15. BURT, R. S. (1992), Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: Harvard University Press.
  16. CHILD, J. (1972),
  17. Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice, Sociology, 6(1), 1-22.
  18. COLEMAN, J. (1990),
  19. Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge: MA: Belknap. DELERY, J. E., ve DOTY D. H. (1996), Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource Management: Tests of Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurat