SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

ÇÖZÜM ODAKLI SOSYAL HİZMET MÜDAHALESİNİN ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN UMUTSUZLUK VE STRES DÜZEYLERİNE ETKİSİ - THE EFFECT OF SOLUTION FOCUSED SOCIAL WORK INTERVENTION ON COLLEGE STUDENTS’ HOPELESSNESS AND STRESS LEVELS

THE EFFECT OF SOLUTION FOCUSED SOCIAL WORK INTERVENTION ON COLLEGE STUDENTS’ HOPELESSNESS AND STRESS LEVELS - ÇÖZÜM ODAKLI SOSYAL HİZMET MÜDAHALESİNİN ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN UMUTSUZLUK VE STRES DÜZEYLERİNE ETKİSİ

Melek ZUBAROĞLU YANARDAĞ
Emine ÖZMETE
Pages
42–66
Publication Date
2020-03-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Results indicate that the social work intervention based on SFBT was statistically significant and effective on the college students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This research aims to investigate the effects of “Social Work Intervention Based on Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) on college students’ hopelessness and stress levels.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: A total of 24 college students who applied Hacettepe University Beytepe Psychological Counseling Unit in the fall of 2015-2016 academic year were assigned to intervention and control groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Results indicate that the social work intervention based on SFBT was statistically significant and effective on the college students.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2015-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Bireylerle sosyal hizmet müdahalesi · çözüm odaklı kısa süreli terapi · üniversite öğrencileri

Abstract

Objective: This research aims to investigate the effects of “Social Work Intervention Based on Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) on college students’ hopelessness and stress levels. Method: A total of 24 college students who applied Hacettepe University Beytepe Psychological Counseling Unit in the fall of 2015-2016 academic year were assigned to intervention and control groups. SFBT between 4-8 sessions were conducted with each student from intervention group during the intervention. A quasi-experimental research model based on pretest-posttest with comparison group has been chosen for the study. Mann Whitney U test was utilized to analyze results. Results: For the Hopelessness Scale the difference among scores for the Motivation Loss Subscale was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Similarly, the difference among the total Hopelessness Scale score and the two other Hopelessness Subscale scores (Expectations and Feelings About Future and Hope Subscales) and for Perceived Stress Scale scores were statistically significant in favor of the intervention group (p < 0.001). Effect size of the intervention was found to be large for all the scales and for most of subscales. Conclusion: Results indicate that the social work intervention based on SFBT was statistically significant and effective on the college students.

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı Çözüm Odaklı Kısa Süreli Terapiye Dayalı Sosyal Hizmet Müdahalesinin üniversite öğrencilerinin umutsuzluk ve stres düzeylerine etkisini incelemektir. Yöntem: 2015-2016 akademik yılı güz döneminde Hacettepe Üniversitesi Beytepe Psikolojik Danışma Birimine başvuran toplamda 24 öğrenci bu araştırmanın deney ve control grubuna dahil edilmiştir. Müdahale kapsamında, deney grubundaki öğrencilere 4-8 oturum arasında ÇOKT uygulanmıştır. Öntest - sontest kontrol gruplu yarı deneysel model bu araştırmada kullanılmıştır. Sonuçların analizinde Mann Whitney U Testi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Umutsuzluk ölçeği motivasyon kaybı altboyutu için puanlar arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı (p<0.05) bulunmuştur. Benzer şekilde toplam Umutsuzluk Ölçeği puanı ve diğer iki Umutsuzluk Ölçeği alt boyutu (gelecekle ilgili duygular ve beklentiler alt boyutu ile umut alt boyutu) ve Algılanan Stres ölçeği puanları arasında müdahale grubunun lehine olacak şekilde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmuştur (p<0.001). Müdahalenin etki büyüklüğü ölçekler açısından ve alt boyutların çoğunluğu açısından yüksek bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Sonuçlar göstermektedir ki ÇOKT’ye dayalı sosyal hizmet müdahalesi üniversite öğrencileri üzerinde etkili ve istastistiksel olarak anlamlıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YANARDAĞ, M. Z., ÖZMETE, E. (2020). ÇÖZÜM ODAKLI SOSYAL HİZMET MÜDAHALESİNİN ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN UMUTSUZLUK VE STRES DÜZEYLERİNE ETKİSİ - THE EFFECT OF SOLUTION FOCUSED SOCIAL WORK INTERVENTION ON COLLEGE STUDENTS’ HOPELESSNESS AND STRESS LEVELS. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 42–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/75293

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. APA & POLL, H. (2014), The Stress in America Survey: 2013. Retrieved from http://www.apapracticecentral.org/update/2014/02-13/teen-stress.aspx.
  2. BALTAS, Z., ATAKUMAN Y., & DUMAN, Y. (1998, July), Standardization of the perceived stress scale: perceived stress in middle managers. Paper presented at the 19th International Conference, Stress and Anxiety Research Society, Istanbul. BANKS, V. (1999). A solution focused approach to adolescent group work. A.N.Z.J. Family Therapy, 20 (2), 78-82.
  3. BECK, T. A. (1963), Thinking and Depression: I. idiosyncratic content and cognitive distortions, Archieves of General Psychiatry, 94 (4). 324-333.
  4. BECK, A., WISSMAN, A., LESTER, D., & TREXLER, L. (1974), The measurement of pessimism: The Hopelessness Scale, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 (6), 861-865.
  5. CARVER, C. S. & CONNOR-SMITH, J. (2010),
  6. Personality and coping, Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679-704. CDC. (2007, Summer), Suicide: facts at a glance. Retrieved from http://www.naswdc.org/practice/adolescent_health/shift/documents/case/Prevalencey%C3%BCzde%2020Data/SHIFT-QuickFacts1.pdf.
  7. COHEN, S., KAMARCK, T. & MERMEISTEIN, A. R. (1983),
  8. Global measure of perceived stress, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 285-396.
  9. COREY, G. (2005), Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy (7th Ed.), Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning. CELIKEL, F. C. & ERKORKMAZ, U. (2008), Depressive symptoms and despair levels in university students and associated factors, Archieves of Neuropsychiatry, 45 (4), 122-129.
  10. DE SHAZER, S. (1985),
  11. Keys to Solutions in Brief Therapy, New York, USA: Norton & Company, 18. DE SHAZER, S., & ISEBAERT, L. (2003), The bruges model: A solution-focused approach to problem drinking, Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 14 (4), 43-52.
  12. DIXON, A. W., HEPPNER, P. P., BURNETT, J. W., & LIPS, B. J. (1993), Hopelessness and stress: Evidence for an interactive model of deppression, Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17 (1), 39-52.
  13. DURAK, A. (1993), A Study on Validity of Beck Hopelessness Scale, Unpublished Master Thesis, Ankara University Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara.
  14. DURAK-BATIGUN, A. (2005), Suicide probability: A study on reasons for living, hopelessness and loneliness, Turkish Journal of Psychiatry,16(1), 29-39.
  15. ESKIN, M., DEMIR, K. H., & DEMIR, S. (2005), Same sex-sexual orientation childhood sexual abuse and suicidal behavior in university students in Turkey, Archieves of Sexual Behavior, 34(2), 185-195.
  16. ESKIN, M., HARLAK, H