Journals / e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

A Content Analysis of English Curriculum Evaluation Studies in Turkey (Between 2005-2021)

Pages
528–544
Publication Date
2022-08-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With this study, the general tendency or framework of studies evaluating language teaching programs, one of the most preferred areas for curriculum evaluation studies, was revealed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Updating and evaluating language teaching programs in Turkey is an important issue, which lead to this issue occupies an important place in the scientific field.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to examine and determine the research trends in the postgraduate theses conducted to evaluate the English teaching programs prepared and updated by the Ministry of National Education since the year of 2005.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With this study, the general tendency or framework of studies evaluating language teaching programs, one of the most preferred areas for curriculum evaluation studies, was revealed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:English curriculum · teaching programs · curriculum evaluation

Abstract

Updating and evaluating language teaching programs in Turkey is an important issue, which lead to this issue occupies an important place in the scientific field. This study aimed to examine and determine the research trends in the postgraduate theses conducted to evaluate the English teaching programs prepared and updated by the Ministry of National Education since the year of 2005. The study was based on the document analysis design and included a total of 52 theses aiming to evaluate English teaching programs between 2005 and 2021 years. The findings showed that the majority of the postgraduate studies aiming to evaluate English language teaching programs were carried out in the last five years, and targeted to evaluate 2012-2013 teaching programs especially designed for early age groups (such as 2nd, 4th and 5th grades). Although Eisner’s Educational Connoisseurship model is the most preferred curriculum evaluation model in graduate theses, a great number of theses were based on the elements and the effectiveness of the curriculum in practice. The theses were determined to adopt mixed methods and descriptive survey design while teachers were preferred as the data source and the studies were carried out with a sample size of 1-50 people without using sampling method. The data of the study in postgraduate theses were collected mostly with survey and interview, and were analyzed with descriptive statistics and comparison tests. With this study, the general tendency or framework of studies evaluating language teaching programs, one of the most preferred areas for curriculum evaluation studies, was revealed.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜER, S. (2022). A Content Analysis of English Curriculum Evaluation Studies in Turkey (Between 2005-2021). e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 528–544. https://ajindex.com/articles/751443

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akcakaya, N. (2009). The organization of 8th grade learners’ beliefs related to learning english as a foreign language. [Unpublished M.A. Thesis]. Gazi Antep University, Gazi Antep. Akpinar, B., Donder, A., Yildirim, B., & Karahan, O. (2012). The evaluation of 4+4+4 system (model) in education in the context of opposite curriculum. Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 36(36), 25–39. https://openaccess.mku.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12483/1833/Akp%c4%b1nar%2c%20Burhan%202012.pdf
  2. Aksoy, E., (2020). Evaluation of the 2017 updated secondary school English curriculum of Turkey by means of theory-practice link. Turkish Journal of Education, 9(1), 1−21. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.575392
  3. Akyuz, Y. (2013). Türk eğitim tarihi [The history of Turkish education] (25. baskı). Pegem Akademi. Al-Jardani, K. S. S. (2012). English language curriculum evaluation in Oman. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(5), 40-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n5p40 Asi̇roglu, S. (2020). Examination of doctoral theses based on mixed method in curriculum and instruction.Academia Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 354-367. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/egitim/issue/54643/769949.
  4. Bayyurt, Y. (2012, Novenber). 4+4+4 Eğitim sisteminde erken yaşta yabancı dil eğitimi [Early foreign language education in 4 + 4 + 4 education system]. Paper presented at the Yabancı Dil Eğitimi Çalıştayı, Hacettepe University, Ankara.( 12-13 November 2012). https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net.
  5. Bharvad, A. J. (2010). Curriculum evaluation. International Research Journal, 1(12), 72-74. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/56610318/CURRICULUM_EVALUATION.pdf.
  6. Bikmaz, F. H., Aksoy, E., Tatar, O., & Altinyuzuk, C. A. (2013). The content analysis of Phd theses completed in the field of curriculum and instruction (1974-2009). Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(168), 287-303. http://eb.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/1627
  7. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.3316/QRJ0902027/full/html.
  8. Cihan, T. & Gurlen, E. (2013). Teachers’ opinions on the English language curriculum of the 5th grade of primary education. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(1), 131-146. http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=7fff0d54-babe-4225-abb5-7b24c7d968ac%40sessionmgr4006
  9. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York: Routledg