Journals / Diyalog Interkulturelle Zeitschrift Für Germanistik / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

The pragmatic and discursive competence in oral examination: A Corpus-based Study among students of the German Language and Literature Department of Ege University

Sözlü Sınavlarda Edimbilimsel-Söylemsel Beceri: Ege Üniversitesi Alman Dili ve Edebiyatı Öğrencileri Örneğinde Sözlü Derleme Dayalı Bir Araştırma

Pages
183–202
Publication Date
2018-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study reveals that the pragmatic and discursive competence of the students of the German Language and Literature Department who took part in the study as subjects did not improve significantly over the three years of undergraduate education following their first year at the university solely through attending courses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Speech competence, which is the most concrete indicator of knowing a foreign language but is ignored in foreign language education, can be defined as an individual’s ability to use that language fluently and effectively in varying communicative situations in a suitable manner to the topic, situation and the partner and the ability to maintain communication in that language without problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The acquisition and progress of speech skill causes a significant problem for the students at the departments of German Language and Literature as well as German Language Education who learn German as a second foreign language after English in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study reveals that the pragmatic and discursive competence of the students of the German Language and Literature Department who took part in the study as subjects did not improve significantly over the three years of undergraduate education following their first year at the university solely through attending courses.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011-2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Almanca Öğretimi · Konuşma Becerisi · Edimbilimsel-söylemsel Beceri

Abstract

Speech competence, which is the most concrete indicator of knowing a foreign language but is ignored in foreign language education, can be defined as an individual’s ability to use that language fluently and effectively in varying communicative situations in a suitable manner to the topic, situation and the partner and the ability to maintain communication in that language without problems. The acquisition and progress of speech skill causes a significant problem for the students at the departments of German Language and Literature as well as German Language Education who learn German as a second foreign language after English in Turkey. Based on this fact, this study aims to analyse the progress of pragmatic and discursive competence of the students who learn German as a second language after English to form a whole through corpus-based data collected via a longitudinal study (between 2011-2014). In the experimental part of the study the corpus-based data was extracted from 20 exam and control speeches of 5 to 20 minute length applied to 8 students at the German Language and Literature department of Ege University Faculty of Letters and this data has been transcribed according to “the discourse and conversation-analytic transcription system” (GAT-2). According to the criteria of the progress of pragmatic and discursive competence have been analysed on one exam and 2 control speeches and then the quantitative data of the study has been collected, and thus the progress in 3 years was determined. The study reveals that the pragmatic and discursive competence of the students of the German Language and Literature Department who took part in the study as subjects did not improve significantly over the three years of undergraduate education following their first year at the university solely through attending courses.

Özet

Bir yabancı dil bilmenin en somut göstergesi olan ancak yabancı dil öğretiminde geri planda kalan konuşma becerisi, bireylerin yetkin oldukları yabancı dili farklı iletişim durumlarında, konuya, duruma ve partnere uygun, akıcı ve etkili şekilde kullanmaları ve bu dilde iletişimi sorunsuz sürdürebilmeleri

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇITAK, Ö. G. (2018). The pragmatic and discursive competence in oral examination: A Corpus-based Study among students of the German Language and Literature Department of Ege University. Diyalog Interkulturelle Zeitschrift Für Germanistik, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 183–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/750447

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Becker-Mrotzek, Michael (2008): “Gesprächskompetenz ermitteln und vermitteln. Gute Aufgaben im Bereich “Sprechen und Zuhören”“. In: Bremerich-Vos, Albert / Granzer, Dietlinde / Köller, Olaf (Hg.) Lernstandsbestimmungen im Fach Deutsch. Gute Aufgaben für den Unterricht. Weinheim / Basel: Beltz. S. 52-77.
  2. Brinker, Klaus / Sager, Sven (2006): Linguistische Gesprächsanalyse. Eine Einführung. 4. durchges. und erg. Auflage. Berlin: Erich Schmidt. Deppermann, Arnulf (2004): “'Gesprächskompetenz' - Probleme und Herausforderungen eines möglichen Begriffs”. In: Becker-Mrotzek, Michael / Brünner, Gisela (Hg.): Analyse und Vermittlung von Gesprächskompetenz. Frankfurt / Bern: Lang. S. 15-28.
  3. Fiehler, Reinhard / Schmitt, Reinhold (2004): “Die Vermittlung kommunikativer Fähigkeiten als Kommunikation. Kommunikationstranings als Gegenstand der Gesprächsanalyse”. In: BeckerMrotzek, Michael / Brünner, Gisela (Hg.): Analyse und Vermittlung von Gesprächskompetenz. Frankfurt / Bern: Lang. S. 113-135.
  4. Forster, Roland (1997): Mündliche Kommunikation in Deutsch als Fremdsprache: Gespräch und Rede. Reihe Sprechen und Verstehen. Bd.12. St. Ingbert: Röhrig. Forster, Roland (2003): “Deutsch als Fremdsprache und Sprechwissenschaft/ Sprecherziehung”. In: Altmayer, Claus / Forster, Roland (Hg.): Deutsch als Fremsprache: Wissenschaftsanspruch – Teilbereiche – Bezugsdisziplinen. Frankfurt am Main: Peterlang Verlag. S. 225-255.
  5. Geissner, Helmut (1982): Sprecherziehung. Didaktik und Methodik der mündlichen Kommunikation. Frankfurt am Main: Scriptor. Grundler, Elke (2011): Kompetent argumentieren. Ein gesprächsanalytisch fundiertes Modell. Tübingen: Stauffenburg. Heyd, Gertraude (1991): Deutsch lehren. Grundwissen für den Unterricht Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Frankfurt am Main: Diesterweg. Knapp-Potthoff, Annelie (2004): “Fremdsprachenunterricht”. In: Knapp, Karlfried / Antos, Gerd / Becker-Mrotzek, Michael / Deppermann, Arnulf / Göpferich, Susanne / Grabowski, Joachim / Klemm, Michael / Villiger, Claudia (Hg.) (2004): Angewandte Linguistik. Ein Lehrbuch. Tübingen: UTB-Francke. S. 367-386.
  6. Lepschy, Annette (2002): “Lehr- und Lernmethoden zur Entwicklung von Gesprächsfähigkeit”. In: Brünner, Gisela / Fiehler, Reinhard / Kindt, Walther (Hg.): Angewandte Diskursforschung, Bd.2: Methoden und Anwendungsbereiche. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung. S. 50-71.
  7. Mönnich, Annette / Spiegel, Carmen (2012): “Kommunikation beobachten und Beurteilen”. In: BeckerMrotzek, Michael (Hg.): Mündliche Kommu