SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yedi / 2018 / Sayı: 20

Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework

İlgım EROĞLU
Journal
Yedi
Pages
53–61
Publication Date
2018-07-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Innovation capabilities for different types of design-driven innovation are identified through related studies in literature to be evaluated together with requirements for success in the two different admission methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Until recently, there had been two diversified student admission methods for product design departments in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These models can be shortly defined as aptitude tests and central examinations conducted by Measuring, Selection and Placement Center (Ölçme Seçme ve Yerleştirme Merkezi – ÖSYM).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Innovation capabilities for different types of design-driven innovation are identified through related studies in literature to be evaluated together with requirements for success in the two different admission methods.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Design education · design-driven innovation · radical innovation

Özet

Until recently, there had been two diversified student admission methods for product design departments in Turkey. These models can be shortly defined as aptitude tests and central examinations conducted by Measuring, Selection and Placement Center (Ölçme Seçme ve Yerleştirme Merkezi – ÖSYM). The nature of these admission methods provided universities with students who had both different abilities and backgrounds. In this study, a conceptual framework is provided to discuss if these differences can enable design students’ with different approaches to design-driven innovation. Innovation capabilities for different types of design-driven innovation are identified through related studies in literature to be evaluated together with requirements for success in the two different admission methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

EROĞLU, İ. (2018). Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework. Yedi, Sayı: 20, 53–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/74995

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alloway, T. P., and Passolunghi, M. C. (2011). “The relationship between working memory, IQ, and mathematical skills in children”. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 133-137.
  2. Amabile, T. M., and Pratt, M. G. (2016). “The Dynamic Componential Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations: Making Progress, Making Meaning”. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157-183.
  3. Asatekin, M. (2006). “ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümü “BAŞLANGIÇ NOTLARI””. Tasarım+ Kuram, 3(5), 28-33.
  4. Basadur, M. (2004). “Leading Others to Think Innovatively Together: Creative Leadership." The Leadership Quarterly 15.1, 103--21. Bayazıt, N. (2006). “İTÜ’de Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümü “DENEYİ’mim”. Tasarım+ Kuram, 3(5), 41-53.
  5. Caves, R. E. (2000). Creative industries: Contracts between art and commerce (No. 20). Harvard University Press.
  6. Celbiş, Ü. (2006). “Marmara Üniversitesi,
  7. Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi, Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümü”. Tasarım+Kuram, 3(5), 34-40.
  8. Cheng, P., Mugge, R., & Schoormans, J. P. (2014). “A new strategy to reduce design fixation: Presenting partial photographs to designers”. Design Studies, 35(4), 374-391.
  9. Crilly, N. (2015). “Fixation and Creativity in Concept Development: The Attitudes and Practices of Expert Designers”. Design Studies, 38, 54-91.
  10. Dahl, D. W., and Moreau, P. (2002). “The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation”. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 47-60.
  11. Dell'Era, C., Marchesi, A., and Verganti, R. (2008). “Linguistic Network Configurations: Management of Innovation in Design-Intensive Firms”. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(01), 1-19.
  12. Dell'Era, C., and Verganti, R. (2009 – a). “The Impact of International Designers on Firm Innovation Capability and Consumer Interest”. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(9), 870-893.
  13. Dell'Era, C., and Verganti, R. (2009 – b). “Design-Driven Laboratories: Organization and Strategy of Laboratories Specialized in The Development of Radical Design‐Driven Innovations”. R&D Management, 39(1), 1-20.
  14. Dell'Era, C., and Verganti, R. (2010). “Collaborative Strategies in Design-Intensive Industries: Knowledge Diversity and Innovation”. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 123-141.
  15. D'zurilla, T. J., and Goldfried, M. R. (1971). “Problem solving and behavior modification”. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78(1), 107. Edens, K., and Potter, E. (2007). “The relationship of drawing and mathematical problem s