SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis / 2017 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4

International Development, State and Society

Uluslararası Kalkınma, Devlet ve Toplum

Erdem YÖRÜK
Pages
309–327
Publication Date
2017-12-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conceptualizations of state and society in each of these approaches are evaluated critically.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article analyzes the theoretical development of the concepts of “the state,” “society” and “state-society” relations, by specifying the changing definitions, differing assumptions, and the variety of exogenous factors that were either included or mitigated in the various theories of international development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this analysis, respectively, classical development theories, modernization perspective, dependency theory, world-system perspective, class-based development theories, neo-liberal theories, state-centered approaches, post-modern theories and globalizationist theories are considered.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conceptualizations of state and society in each of these approaches are evaluated critically.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Uluslararası kalkınma · devlet · toplum

Abstract

This article analyzes the theoretical development of the concepts of “the state,” “society” and “state-society” relations, by specifying the changing definitions, differing assumptions, and the variety of exogenous factors that were either included or mitigated in the various theories of international development. In this analysis, respectively, classical development theories, modernization perspective, dependency theory, world-system perspective, class-based development theories, neo-liberal theories, state-centered approaches, post-modern theories and globalizationist theories are considered. Conceptualizations of state and society in each of these approaches are evaluated critically.

Özet

Bu makale, değişen tanımları, farklı varsayımları ve çeşitli kuramlar bünyesinde içerilen ya da etkisi azaltılan bir dizi dışsal etkeni belirterek “devlet”, “toplum” ve “devlet-toplum” ilişkileri kavramlarının uluslararası kalkınma kuramları içerisindeki gelişimini tahlil etmektedir. Bu analizde, sırası ile klasik kalkınma kuramları, modernleşme perspektifi, bağımlılık kuramı, dünya-sistemi perspektifi, sınıf-temelli kalkınma kuramları, neo-liberal kuramlar, devlet-merkezli yaklaşımlar ve post-modern kuramlar ve küreselleşmeci kuramlar ele alınmaktadır. Her bir yaklaşıma ait toplum-devlet kavramsallaştırması eleştirel bir şekilde değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÖRÜK, E. (2017). International Development, State and Society. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4, 309–327. https://ajindex.com/articles/745654

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Arrighi, G. (1990). The developmentalist illusion: A reconceptualization of the semiperiphery. In Martin W. G. (Eds.), Semiperipheral States in the World Economy. New York: Greenwood Press.
  2. Baran, P. (1952). On the political economy of backwardness. The Manchester School of Economy and Social Studies, 20(1), 66-84. Retrieved from https://marx21.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/baran-1952-on-the-political-economy-of-backwardness.pdf
  3. Cardoso, F. H. (1972). Dependency and development in Latin America. New Left Review, 74, 83-95.
  4. Castells, M. (2004). The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  5. Chase-Dunn, C. & Rubinson, R. (1977). Toward a structural perspective on the world-system. Politics and Society, 7(4), 453 - 476. doi:10.1177/003232927700700403 Chatterjee P. (1993).
  6. The nation and its fragment, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  7. Chibber, V. (2003). Locked in place: State-building and late industrialization in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  8. Durkheim, E. (1964). Division of labor in society. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe. Frank, G. A. (1966). The development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review. Gereffi, G., Korzeniewicz, M., & Korzeniewicz, R. P. (1994). Introduction: global commodity chains. In Gereffi G. & Korzeniewicz M. (Eds.), Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger. Harvey, D. (1989). Conditions of post-modernity: An Enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford, OX: Blackwell Publishers.
  9. Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton J. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  10. Krueger, A. O. (1990). Government failures in development. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(3), 9-23. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1942926
  11. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1811581
  12. Marx, K. & Engels, F. (2001). The German ideology: Part one, with selections from parts two and three, together with Marx's "Introduction to a critique of political economy." New York, NY: International Publishers.
  13. Moore, B. (1993). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  14. Munck, R. (2005). Globalization and social exclusion: A transformationalist perspective. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
  15. Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist man