Journals / Bahri Dağdaş Bitkisel Araştırma Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of Relationships between Yield and Technological Properties of Winter Oat (Avena sativa spp.) Genotypes

Kışlık Yulaf (Avena sativa spp.) Genotiplerinin Verim ve Teknolojik Özellikleri Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi

Pages
34–42
Publication Date
2019-07-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The change intervals and average of examined properties; protein content 10.59-20.85 (15.02)%, fat content 3.23-8.09 (5.33)%, test weight 27.03-62.74 (44.83) kg, thousand kernel weight 13.55-43.22 (29.93) g, beta glucan 0.84-4.24 (2.84)%, ADF 8.52-25.43 (16.84)%, NDF 16.84-49.01 (31.91)%, cellulose 5.77-25.46 (12.82)% of oat genotypes were determined as.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a total of 328 oat grown in the conditions of Central Anatolia between 2012 and 2016 were used.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was aimed to determine the relationship between grain yield and the examined technological properties.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The change intervals and average of examined properties; protein content 10.59-20.85 (15.02)%, fat content 3.23-8.09 (5.33)%, test weight 27.03-62.74 (44.83) kg, thousand kernel weight 13.55-43.22 (29.93) g, beta glucan 0.84-4.24 (2.84)%, ADF 8.52-25.43 (16.84)%, NDF 16.84-49.01 (31.91)%, cellulose 5.77-25.46 (12.82)% of oat genotypes were determined as.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yulaf · verim · protein

Abstract

In this study, a total of 328 oat grown in the conditions of Central Anatolia between 2012 and 2016 were used. It was aimed to determine the relationship between grain yield and the examined technological properties. Grain yield (kg/da), thousand kernel weight (g), hectoliter (kg), protein content (%), fat content (%), beta glucan (%), acid detergent fiber (ADF) (%), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) (%), cellulose (%) of oat genotypes were determined. Correlations and regressions, which were found to be significant between grain yield and properties, examined. It was determined that the average grain yield of oat genotypes was 314.40 kg/da and the grain yield potential could be increased to 655 kg/da. Parallel to the increase in the grain yield, thousand kernel weight and beta glucan ratio were not affected, protein content, fat content, test weight, ADF amount decreased, NDF and cellulose content increased. The change intervals and average of examined properties; protein content 10.59-20.85 (15.02)%, fat content 3.23-8.09 (5.33)%, test weight 27.03-62.74 (44.83) kg, thousand kernel weight 13.55-43.22 (29.93) g, beta glucan 0.84-4.24 (2.84)%, ADF 8.52-25.43 (16.84)%, NDF 16.84-49.01 (31.91)%, cellulose 5.77-25.46 (12.82)% of oat genotypes were determined as.

Özet

Bu çalışmada 2012-2016 yılları arasında Orta Anadolu şartlarında yetiştirilen toplamda 328 adet yulaf materyali kullanılmıştır. Tane verimi ile incelenen teknolojik özellikler arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yulaf genotiplerinin, tane verimi (kg/da), bin tane ağırlığı (g), hektolitre ağırlığı (kg), protein oranı (%), yağ oranı (%), beta glukan (%), asit deterjanda çözünmeyen lif (ADF) (%), nötr deterjanda çözünmeyen lif (NDF) (%) ve selüloz (%) oranları tespit edilmiştir. Tane verimi ile özellikler arasında önemli bulunan korelasyonlar ve regresyonlar incelenmiştir. Yulaf genotiplerinin ortalama tane veriminin 314.40 kg/da olduğu, tane verimi potansiyelinin 655 kg/da’a kadar çıktığı tespit edilmiştir. Tane verimindeki artışa paralel olarak bin tane ağırlığı ve beta glukan oranı etkilenmemiş, protein oranı, yağ oranı, hektolitre ağırlığı, ADF miktarı azalmış, NDF ve selüloz miktarı artmıştır. İncelenen özelliklerin değişim aralıkları ve ortalaması; protein oranı %10.59-20.85 (15.02), yağ oranı %3.23-8.09 (5.33), hektolitre ağırlığı 27.03-62.74 (44.83) kg, bin tane ağırlığı 13.55-43.22 (29.93) g, beta glukan %0.84-4.24 (2.84), ADF %8.52-25.43 (16.88), NDF %16.84-49.01 (31.91), selüloz %5.77-25.46 (12.82) olarak tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, M., ÇERİ, S., AKÇACIK, A. G., AYDOĞAN, S., HAMZAOĞLU, S., DEMİR, B. (2019). Investigation of Relationships between Yield and Technological Properties of Winter Oat (Avena sativa spp.) Genotypes. Bahri Dağdaş Bitkisel Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 34–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/738784

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Anonymous, (1995).
  2. AOAC, Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists 15th edn. Association of analytical chemist, Inc., Arlington, VA, 1298 pp. Anonymous, (2000). AACC Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemist, USA. Anonymous, (2009). Approvedmethodologies. www.leco.com/resources/approved_methods Anonymous, (2014). JMP11, JSL Syntax Reference. SAS Institute.ISBN: 978-1-62959-560-3.
  3. Brunava, L., Vilmane, L., Zute, S. (2015). Influence of nitrogen application rate and meteorological conditions on-glucan content in naked and husked oat grain. Proceedings Of The Latvıan Academy Of Sciences. Section B, Vol. 69 (2015), No. 4 (697), Pp. 178–181.
  4. Demirbaş, A. (2005). ß-Glucan and mineral nutrient contents of cereals grown in Turkey. Food Chemistry, 90: 773- 777. Doehlert, D. C., McMullen, M. S., Hammond, J. J. (2001). Genotypic and environmental effects on grain yield and quality of oat grown in North Dakota. Crop Science 41: 1066-1072.
  5. Dumlupınar, Z., Kara, R., Dokuyucu, T., Akkaya, A. (2008). Correlation and path analysis of grain yield and yield components of some turkish oat genotypes. International Oat Conference, Minneapolis, USA. Kahraman, T., Avcı, R., Kurt, C. (2017). Bazı yulaf (Avena sativa L.) genotiplerinin tane verimi,kalite ve tarımsal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 2017, 26 (Özel Sayı): 74−79. Kliševičiūtė, V., Švirmickas, G. J., Alijošius, S., Gružauskas, R., Šašytė, V., Racevičiūtė-Stupelienė, A. (2016). Nutritional value and digestible energy of different genotypes of oats in the horses nutrition.Veterinarija Ir Zootechnika (Vet Med Zoot). T. 73 (95) Supplement. Klose, C. Arendt, E. K. (2012). Proteins in oats; their synthesisand changes during germinations:a review. Critical Reviews in food science and nutrition Vol.52 No.7 p 629-639.
  6. Kriger, O. V., Kashirskih, E. V., Babich, О. О., Noskova, S. Yu. (2018). Oat Protein Concentrate Production. Foods and Raw Materials, Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 47–55. DOI: 10.21603/2308-4057-2018-1-47-55. Kün,, E. (1988). Serin iklim tahılları. Ankara Üni. Zir. Fak. Yayınları, No 1032, Ankara.
  7. Lannucci, A., Codianni, P., Cattivelli, L. (2011). Evaluation of genotype diversity in oat germplasm and definition of ideotypes adapted to the mediterranean environment. Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Agronomy, Article ID 870925. Mut, Z., Doğanay, Ö., Köse, E., Akay, H. (2016a). Grain yield and some qu