SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 12

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE UN AND NATO’S PEACE OPERATIONS DOCTRINES

BM VE NATO’NUN BARIŞ OPERASYONLARI DOKTRİNLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZİ

Kıvılcım ROMYA BİLGİN
Pages
176–194
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

From this point of view, a comparative analysis of the doctrines of peace operations will be carried out within the scope of the study and the increasing importance of the UN and NATO's approaches to operations will be put forward in the analysis international security system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Peace operations are indispensable components of the international security system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The UN and NATO, together with military and civilian elements, are the most important drivers of peace operations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:From this point of view, a comparative analysis of the doctrines of peace operations will be carried out within the scope of the study and the increasing importance of the UN and NATO's approaches to operations will be put forward in the analysis international security system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:NATO · DOKTRİNLER · BARIŞ OPERASYONLARI

Abstract

Peace operations are indispensable components of the international security system. The UN and NATO, together with military and civilian elements, are the most important drivers of peace operations. The most comprehensive doctrines for peace operations were prepared by the UN and NATO from international/regional organizations. Doctrines are important for demonstrating the experiences of the UN and NATO-led operations and how they will play their role in operations in the future. Moreover, countries are shaping their peace operation doctrines according to the doctrines prepared by the UN and NATO. From this point of view, a comparative analysis of the doctrines of peace operations will be carried out within the scope of the study and the increasing importance of the UN and NATO's approaches to operations will be put forward in the analysis international security system.

Özet

Barış operasyonları uluslararası güvenlik sisteminin önemli bileşenlerinden biridir. BM ve NATO ise barış operasyonlarının askeri ve sivil unsurlarla birlikte en önemli yürütücüsü konumundadır. Barış operasyonlarına yönelik en kapsamlı doktrinler uluslararası/bölgesel örgütlerden BM ve NATO tarafından hazırlanmıştır. Doktrinler BM ve NATO tarafından yürütülen operasyonlarda edinilen tecrübelerin neler olduğunu ve gelecek dönemde her iki örgütün operasyonlardaki rollerini nasıl oynayacaklarını göstermesi bakımından önemlidir. Dahası ülkeler kendi barış operasyonu doktrinlerini BM ve NATO tarafından hazırlanan doktrinlere göre şekillendirmektedir. Bu noktadan hareketle, çalışma kapsamında barış operasyonları doktrinlerinin karşılaştırmalı bir analizi yapılarak BM’nin ve NATO’nun operasyonlara yönelik yaklaşımları analiz uluslararası güvenlik sistemindeki artan önemleri ortaya konulacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİN, K. R. (2020). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE UN AND NATO’S PEACE OPERATIONS DOCTRINES. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 12, 176–194. https://ajindex.com/articles/737463

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. BELLAMY, A. J., Williams P., ve Griffin, S. (2004),
  2. Understanding Peacekeeping, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. BOUTROS-GHALI, B. (1992),
  3. An Agenda For Peace, New York: UN Publications. DEMİRÖĞEN, Ü. (2006), Birleşmiş Milletler Barışı Koruma Operasyonları ve Güç Kullanma Olgusu (1946-1996), Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 11, s. 236-257.
  4. DOMINICK, D. (2001), The Doctrine Gap: The Enduring Problem of Contemporary Peace Support Operations Thinking, Contemporary Security Policy, 22 (3), s.107-139.
  5. MINISTRY of DEFENCE (2004), The Military Contribution to Peace Support Operations: Joint Warfare Publication 3-50, Second Edition, https://www.gov.uk (Erişim Tarihi: 02.04.2018).
  6. FORTNA, V.P. (2004), Does Peacekeeping Keep Peace?: International Intervention and the Duration of Peace After Civil War, International Studies Quarterly, 48 (2), s. 269-292.
  7. FRANTZEN, H. A. (2005), NATO and Peace Support Operations: 1991-1999, Oxon: Frank Cass. GLOBAL POLICY FORUM (2008), The United Nations Reform. http://www.globalpolicy.org/un-reform.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 1511.2017).
  8. GRAY, C. (2001), Peacekeeping After the Brahimi Report: Is There a Crisis of Credibility for the UN?, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 6 (2), s. 267-288.
  9. HOLLEY, I.B. (2004), Technology and Military Doctrine. Alabama: Maxwell. HOLT, V. K., Berkman T. (2006), The Impossible Mandate?: Military Preparedness, The Responsibility to Protect and Modern Peace Operations. Washington: Henry Stimson Center. INDIAN Army (2004), Indian Army Doctrine, http://ids.nic.in/Indian%20Army%20Doctrine/indianarmydoctrine_1.doc, (Erişim Tarihi: 09.11.2018).
  10. KARADAĞ, H. (2016), Forcing the Common Good: The Significance of Public Diplomacy in Military Affairs, Armed Forces & Society, 43(1), 72–91.
  11. KATAYANAGI, M. (2014), UN Peacekeeping and Human Rights, (Eds.: J. Genser and B. S. Ugarte), The United Nations Security Council in the Age of Human Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s.123-153.
  12. MILLER, P. D. (1995), Leadership in a Transitional World: The Challenge of Keeping of the Peace, (Ed.: D.N. Nelson), After Authoritarianism: Democracy or Disorder?, Westport: Greenwood Press, s.135-162.
  13. NATO (2009), NATO Peace Support Operations Doctrine (AJP 3.4.1), http://www.natolibguides.info, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.12.2018).
  14. NATO (2017), AJP-01 Allied Joint Doctrine, http://www.natolibguides.info, (Erişim Tarihi: 09.11.2017).
  15. NORDCAPS (2007), NORDCAPS PSO Tactical Manuals. www.nordcaps.org/tactical_manual/volume2.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 09.11