Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2005 / Cilt: 2005 - Sayı: 1

ORTODONTİK TEDAVİ GÖREN BİREYLERDE FARKLI GARGARALARIN AĞIZ

Pages
12–21
Publication Date
2005-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗

Abstract

-

Özet

Bu çal# mada, farkl# kimyasal etkinli-e sahip üç a-#z gargaras#n#n k#sa süreli kullan#m#n#n(chlorhexidine gluconate, benzydamine hydrochloride (HCI) ve polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine) ortodontik tedavi gören bireylerin a-#z sa-l#klar# üzerindeki etkileri de-erlendirilmi tir. Ya ortalamas# 14.5±2.4 y#l olan 60 birey 15'er ki ilik üç tedavi grubuna (%0.2 chlorhexidine gluconate, %0.15 benzydamine HCI ve %7.5 polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine) ve bir kontrol grubuna (%0.9 sodium chloride içeren steril izotonic saline) ayr#lm# t#r. Bireylerin tedavi ba lang#c# ve tedaviden bir ay sonraki gingival indeks (GI), plak indeks (PI) ve di eti kanama indeksi (GBI) skorlar#ayn# periodontolog taraf#ndan de-erlendirilmi tir. Tedavi ba #nda, gingival indeks skorlar# “1” den yüksek olanlar tedavi grubunu, “1” den dü ük olanlar kontrol grubunu olu turmu tur. Cndeks de-eri “2” nin üzerinde olanlar çal# maya al#nmam# t#r. Gruplar aras#ndaki farkl#l#klar Varyans analizi kullan#larak de-erlendirilmi tir. GI skorlar#, PI skorlar#, ve GBI skorlar# incelendi-inde bir ayl#k gargara kullan#m#sonucunda a-#z hijyeninde olumlu de-i imlerin oldu-u belirlenmi tir. GI skorlar#, tedavi sonunda her üç gargara grubunda kontrol grubuna göre anlaml#düzeyde azal#rken, gargara gruplar# aras#nda herhangi bir fark bulunmam# t#r. Plak olu umunda ve di eti kanamas#n#nchlorhexidine gargaralar#n#nbelirlenmi tir. Sonuç olarak, ortodontik tedavi gören bireylerde a-#zsa-l#-#n#n iyile tirilmesinde etkili olmu tur

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYDAŞ, D. D. B., KAVRUT, A. D. F. (2005). ORTODONTİK TEDAVİ GÖREN BİREYLERDE FARKLI GARGARALARIN AĞIZ. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 2005 - Sayı: 1, 12–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/736423

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Yüksel S, Üçem TT, Meral O, Unsal B. Sabit tedavi tekniklerinde farkl# ba-lama sistemlerinin a-#z hijyenine etkilerinin de-erlendirilmesi. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi.1997;10: 16-9.
  2. Lunstrom F, Krasse B. Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli frequently in orthodontic patients, the effect of chlorhexidine treatments. Eur J Orthod. 1987;9:109-16.
  3. Svanberg, M, Ljunglof S, Thilander B. Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguis in plaque from orthodontic bands and brackets. Eur J Orthod.1984; 6:132-6.
  4. Balenseifen JW, Madonia JV. Study of dental plaque in orthodontic patients. J Dent Res. 1970; 49:320-4. Corbett JA. Comparison of Streptococcus mutans concentrations in nonbanded and banded orthodontic patients. J Dent Res.1981;60:1936-42.
  5. Sakamaki ST, Bahn AN. Effect of orthodontic banding on localized oral lactobacilli. J Dent Res. 1968; 47:275-9.
  6. Huser MC, Baehni PC, Lang R. Effects of orthodontic bands on microbiologic and clinical parameters. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;97: 213-8.
  7. Zachrisson S, Zachrisson BU. Gingival condition associated with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1972; 42: 26-34. Sinclair PM. Changes in gingiva and gingival flora with bonding and banding. Angle Orthod. 1987;47:271-8
  8. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod.1982; 81:92-8. White L. A new oral strategy. Am J Orthod. 1984; 86: 507-515.
  9. Bringhtman LJ, Terezhalmy GT, et al. The effects of a 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconat mouthrinse on orthodontic patients aged 11 through 17 with established gingivitis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.1991;100:324-9.
  10. Anderson GB, Bowden J, Morrison EC, Caffesse RG. Clinical effects of chlorhexidine mouthwashes on patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;111:606-612.
  11. Babay NA, Jasser NA. Subgingival irrigation effects of chlorhexidine or sanguinarine on gingivitis in orthodontic patients. J Clin Pediatr Dent.1996;20: 225-8.
  12. Eaton KA, Rimini FM, Zak E, Brookman DJ, Hopkins LMA, Cannell PJ, Yates LG, Morrice CA, Lall BA, Newman HN. The effects of a 0.12% chlorhexidine-digluconate-containing mouthrinse versus a placebo on plaque and gingival inflamation over a 3-month. J Clin Periodontol. 1997; 24: 189-197.
  13. Overholser CD, Meilier TF, De Paula LG, Minah GE, Niehaus C. Comparative effects of 2 chemotherapeutic mouthrinses on the development of supragingival dental plaque and gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 1990;17: 575-9.
  14. Gusberti FA, Sampathkumar P, Si