SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2006 / Cilt: 2006 - Sayı: 2

FAILURE IN POST-CORE RESTORATIONS

POST-KOR UYGULAMALARINDA BAŞARISIZLIKLAR

Yrd. Doç. Dr. İdil DİKBAŞ
Yrd. Doç. Dr. Temel KÖKSAL
Pages
41–51
Publication Date
2006-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗

Abstract

-

Özet

A r madde kayb na u-ram endodontik tedavili di lerde, restorasyona tutuculuk sa-lamak amac yla post-kor sistemlerinden biri kullan lmaktad r. Bu makalede geni bir literatür taramas yap larak, postkor uygulamalar nda kar la lan ba ar s zl k tiplerinden söz edilmi tir. Ba ar da rol oynayan en önemli etken do-ru endikasyonun konulmas ve uygulamada ana prensiplerin takip edilmesidir. Henüz uzun takip sonuçlar olmamas na ra-men, ba ar s zl - n tipi, telafi edilebilirli-i ve s kl - bak m ndan en uygun olan post tipinin fiber destekli postlar oldu-u görülmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

DİKBAŞ, Y. D. D. İ., KÖKSAL, Y. D. D. T. (2006). FAILURE IN POST-CORE RESTORATIONS. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 2006 - Sayı: 2, 41–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/736373

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 32. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275-8.
  2. Ferrari M, Scotti R. Fiber posts: Characteristics and clinical applications. Birinci bask, Masson S.p.A., Milano, Italy, 2002: 121-30.
  3. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhesive Dent 1999;:153-8.
  4. Goodacre CJ, Kan JYK. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK. Endodontics. BC Decker Inc., Canada, 2002; 50. Ottl P, Lauer HC. Success rates for two different types of post-and-cores. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 8. Morgano SM, Rodrigues AHC, Sabrosa CE. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48: 397-416.
  5. Qualtrough AJE, Mannocci F. Tooth colored post systems: A review. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 86-91.
  6. Silness J, Gustavsen F, Hunsbeth J. Distribution of corrosion products in teeth restored with metal crowns retained by stainless steel posts. Acta Odontol Scand 1979; 37: 317-21.
  7. Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 439-44. Turner CH. Post-retained crown failure: a survey. Dent Update 1982; 9: 193-202.
  8. Pitel ML, Hicks NL. Evolving technology in endodontic posts. Compendium 2003; 24: 13-29.
  9. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000; 13 (Spec No): 9B- B. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000; 13: (Spec No): 15B-18B. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 151-7. Glazer B. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fiber posts- A prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 2000; 66: 613-8.
  10. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber- reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont; 16: 39-44.
  11. Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth re