SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2006 / Cilt: 2006 - Sayı: 2

COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TWO LOCAL ANESTHETICS IN THE CONTROL OF PAIN AFTER MOLAR REMOVAL

MOLAR DİŞ ÇEKİMİNİ TAKİBEN AĞRI KONTROLÜNDE İKİ LOKAL ANESTEZİĞİNİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN VE GÜVENİRLİLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Göksel Şimşek KAYA
Yrd. Doç. Dr. M. Cemil BÜYÜKKURT
Prof. Dr. Ertunç DAYI
Pages
22–25
Publication Date
2006-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗

Abstract

-

Özet

Lokal anestezikler kullanarak hastan n a2r s n nkontrol alt na al nmas , ba ar l dental tedavinin en önemli faktörlerinden biridir. Çal mam z n amac ,octapressin içeren Prilocain (CitanestR) ile epinephrine HCL içeren Articain HCL (Ultracain DS-ForteR)’ün molar di çekimi takibinde geli en a2r n n kontrolü üzerine olan etkilerini ve bu iki ajan n güvenilirli2ini kar la t rmakt . Post-operatif a2r kontrolleri aç s ndan yaln z 4. saatte istatistiksel olarak anlaml bir fark gözlendi. Ayr ca, Articain HCL veya Prilocain ile ilgili ciddi bir ters etki gözlenmedi. Bu çal man nsonuçlar na dayanarak, postoperatif a2r kontrolünde her iki anestezik solüsyonun sadece benzer ekilde bir etkiye sahip olmad klar n ayn zamanda güvenli olarak kullan labileceklerini de dü ünmekteyiz

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, Y. D. D. G. Ş., BÜYÜKKURT, Y. D. D. M. C., DAYI, P. D. E. (2006). COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TWO LOCAL ANESTHETICS IN THE CONTROL OF PAIN AFTER MOLAR REMOVAL. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 2006 - Sayı: 2, 22–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/736369

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Costa CG, Tortamano IP,Rocha RG, Francischone CE, Tortamano Nicolau. Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration. Quintessence Int. 2005 Mar; 36(3):197-201.
  2. Allman KG, McFadyen JG, Armstrong J, Sturrock GD, Wilson IH. Comparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for single medial canthus peribulbar anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Oct; 87(4):584-7.
  3. Uckan S, Guler N, Sumer M, Ungor M. Local anesthetic efficacy for oral surgery: Comparison of diphenhydramine and prilocaine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Jul; 86(1): 26-30.
  4. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Efficacy of articaine: A new amid local anesthetic. JADA. 2000:131; 635-642.
  5. Oertel R, Rahn R and Kirch W. Clinical pharmacokinetics of articaine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Dec; 33(6):417-25.
  6. Review. Metaxotos NG, Asplund O, and Hayes M. The efficacy of bupivacaine with adrenaline in reducing pain and bleeding associated with breast reduction: a prospective trial. The British of Plastic Surgery. 1999: 52; 290-293.
  7. Jensen OT, Upton LG, Hayward JR, Sweet RB. Advantages of long-acting local anesthesia using etidocaine hydrochloride. J Oral Surg. 1981 May; 39(5):350-3.
  8. Tuffin JR, Cunliffe DR, Begg R, Shaw SR. Does bupivacaine irrigation of third molar sockets reduce postoperative pain? A double blind controlled trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990 Apr; 28(2):96-8. Laskin JL. Use of etidocaine hydrochloride in oral surgery: a clinical study. J Oral Surg. 1978 Nov; 36(11):863-5.
  9. Meechan JG, Blair GS The effect of two different local anaesthetic solutions on pain experience following apicectomy. Br Dent J. 1993 Dec 11-25; 175(11-12):410-3.
  10. Laskin JL, Wallace WR, DeLeo B Use of bupivacaine hydrochloride in oral surgery-a clinical study. J Oral Surg. 1977 Jan; 35(1):25-9. Nespeca JA Clinical trials with bupivacaine in oral surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976 Sep; 42(3):301-7. Pricco DF. An evaluation of bupivacaine for regional nerve block in oral surgery. J Oral Surg. 1977 Feb; 35(2):126-9.
  11. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. A comparison between articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 2000 Jul- Aug; 22(4):307-11.
  12. Donaldson D, James-Perdok L, Craig BJ, Derkson GD, Richardson AS. A comparison of Ultracaine DS (articaine HCl) and Citanest forte (prilocaine HCl) in maxillary infiltration and mandibular nerve block. J Can Dent Assoc. 1987 Jan;53(1):38-42.
  13. Haas DA, Harper DG, Saso MA, Young ER. Lack of differentia