In this study the relationship between economic growth and unemployment rate in Turkish economy has been revealed empirically for the period 1970 2010 The study has provided a theoretical information before and then it has determined the direction of the relationship between the unemployment rates and economic growth with the economic analysis According to the results of the study one way casual relationship from the growth rate towards the unemployment was found in the period of 1970 2010 in Turkish In this context the economic growth is a factor affecting unemployment in Turkish economy but high and low rate in unemployment have no effect on the arising of economic growth Key Words : Economic Growth Unemployment Granger Causality Test Co integration Test
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study the relationship between economic growth and unemployment rate in Turkish economy has been revealed empirically for the period 1970 2010 The study has provided a theoretical information before and then it has determined the direction of the relationship between the unemployment rates and economic growth with the economic analysis According to the results of the study one way casual relationship from the growth rate towards the unemployment was found in the period of 1970 2010 in Turkish In this context the economic growth is a factor affecting unemployment in Turkish economy but high and low rate in unemployment have no effect on the arising of economic growth Key Words : Economic Growth Unemployment Granger Causality Test Co integration Test
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study the relationship between economic growth and unemployment rate in Turkish economy has been revealed empirically for the period 1970 2010 The study has provided a theoretical information before and then it has determined the direction of the relationship between the unemployment rates and economic growth with the economic analysis According to the results of the study one way casual relationship from the growth rate towards the unemployment was found in the period of 1970 2010 in Turkish In this context the economic growth is a factor affecting unemployment in Turkish economy but high and low rate in unemployment have no effect on the arising of economic growth Key Words : Economic Growth Unemployment Granger Causality Test Co integration Test
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study the relationship between economic growth and unemployment rate in Turkish economy has been revealed empirically for the period 1970 2010 The study has provided a theoretical information before and then it has determined the direction of the relationship between the unemployment rates and economic growth with the economic analysis According to the results of the study one way casual relationship from the growth rate towards the unemployment was found in the period of 1970 2010 in Turkish In this context the economic growth is a factor affecting unemployment in Turkish economy but high and low rate in unemployment have no effect on the arising of economic growth Key Words : Economic Growth Unemployment Granger Causality Test Co integration Test
In this study the relationship between economic growth and unemployment rate in Turkish economy has been revealed empirically for the period 1970 2010 The study has provided a theoretical information before and then it has determined the direction of the relationship between the unemployment rates and economic growth with the economic analysis According to the results of the study one way casual relationship from the growth rate towards the unemployment was found in the period of 1970 2010 in Turkish In this context the economic growth is a factor affecting unemployment in Turkish economy but high and low rate in unemployment have no effect on the arising of economic growth Key Words : Economic Growth Unemployment Granger Causality Test Co integration Test
Özet
Bu çalışmada, Türkiye ekonomisinde iktisadi büyüme ve işsizlik oranı arasındaki ilişki 1970-2010 dönemi için ampirik olarak ortaya konulmuştur. Çalışma, önce teorik olarak bilgi sunmakta daha sonrada ekonometrik analizler ile büyüme ve işsizlik oranları arasındaki ilişkinin yönünü belirlemeye çalışmaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, Türkiye’de 1970-2010 dönemi için büyüme oranından işsizliğe doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmuştur. Bu çerçevede, Türkiye ekonomisinde iktisadi büyüme, işsizliği etkileyen faktörler içinde yer almakta ancak işsizliğin yüksek veya düşük oranda gerçekleşmesi ekonomik büyümenin oluşmasında herhangi bir etkiye sahip bulunmamaktadır
KANCA, A. G. O. C. (2012). Türkiye’de İşsizlik Ve iktisadi Büyüme Arasındaki Nedenselliğin Ampirik Bir Analizi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 1–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/73633
Aghion, P. ve Howitt,P. (1992); “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction”, Econometrica, 60:323–351.
Aktürk, F. (1999); “Türkiye’de İşgücü Piyasası, İstihdam ve İşsizlik”, Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi, Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı, Araştırma Planlama ve Koordinasyon Kurulu Başkanlığı, Neyir Mat., Yıl: 2,(3):190. Ayhan, F. (2008); “İşsizlik ve İktisadi Büyüme İlişkisinin Türkiye Üzerinde Analizine Yönelik Bir Uygulama”, Balıkesir üniversitesi, S. B.E. Balıkesir. Barışık,S., Çevik, E.İ. ve Çevik, N.K. (2010); “Türkiye’de Okun Yasası, Asimetri İlişkisi ve İstihdam Yaratmayan Büyüme: Markov-Switching Yaklaşımı” Maliye Dergisi Sayı 159. Barreto H. ve Howland F. (1993);” There Are Two Okun’s Law Relationships Between OutputandUnemployment”,Web:http://www.wabash.edu/dept/economics/Facult y% 20 Work/Okun/okun93.pdf. Cabellero, R. (1993); “Comment on Bean and Pissarides”, European Economic Review. 37: 855-859.
Ceylan, S. ve Şahin, B. Y. (2010); “İşsizlik ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisinde Asimetri” Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 11 (2): 157-165.
Christopoulos, D. K. (2004); “The Relationship Between Output And Unemployment: Evidence from Greek regions”, Papers İn Regional Science. Vol.83. Edward S. K. & II. (2007); "How useful is Okun's law?," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Issue Q IV: 73-103.
Engle, R ve Granger, C. (1987); Co-integration and Error Correction:Represantion, Estimation and Testing. Econometrica, 55: 251-76.
Dornbusch, R. ve Fischer, S.(1998),
Makro Ekonomi, McGraw Hill-Akademi, İstanbul.
Granger, C.W.J. (1969); “Investigating Causal Relations By Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods”, Econometrica, (37). Gujarati, D.N. (1995);
Basic Econometrics, Mc Graw-Hill, Literatür Yayıncılık, Third Edition,
İstanbul.
Güran, N. (1999);
Makro Ekonomik Analiz, İkinci Baskı,
Anadolu Matbaacılık, İzmir. Hoon H.T., ve Phelps E.S. (1997); “Growth, Wealth, and the Natural Rate: Is Europes Job Crisis and Growth Crisis?”, European Economic Review. 41: 549-557.
Holmes, M. J. ve Silverstone, B. (2006); “Okun’s Law, Asymmetries and Jobless Recoveries in the United States: A Markov-Switching Approach”, Economics Letters, Vol: 92, 293-299.
Huang, Ho, C. ve Lin, S. C. (2008); “Smooth-time-varying Okun’s Coefficients”, Economic Modelling, Vol. 25: 363-375.
Işığıçok, E. (1994); Zaman Serilerinde Nedensellik Çözümlemesi, Uludağ Üniversitesi Basımevi, Bursa. İyibozkurt, E. (1997);
Güncel Ekonomik Sorunlarımız, Küreselleşme ve Ekonomim