Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2011 / Cilt: 2011 - Sayı: 4

Prosthetic obturation of an non-congenital maxillary defect: a case report

Sonradan kazanılmış bir maksiller defektin protetik obturasyonu : bir olgu sunumu

Pages
122–127
Publication Date
2011-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗

Abstract

-

Özet

Tümöral nedenler sonucu yapılan maksiller rezeksiyonlar hastada; estetik, fonetik, fonksiyonel ve önemli psikolojik problemlere sebep olur. Protetik rehabilitasyonun primer amacı; farklı bulb dizaynlarıyla, maksiller defekti kapatmak ve bu problemleri ortadan kaldırmaktır. Obturatör; maksiller tümör cerrahisinden sonra oluşan defektler için bir tedavi şeklidir. Bu makalede, tümör sonucu maksiller rezeksiyon yapılan hastada hollow bulb obturatör ile protetik rehabilitasyon anlatılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, A. H., ALADAĞ, P. D. L. İ. (2011). Prosthetic obturation of an non-congenital maxillary defect: a case report. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 2011 - Sayı: 4, 122–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/736217

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Yazdanie N, Mandersen RD. Prosthetic management and rehabilitation of an extensive intraoral and facial defect. Int J Prosthodont 1989; 2: 550-554. Adisman IK. Prosthesis serviceability for acquired jaw defects. Dent Clin North Am 1990; 34: 265- 283. Yontchev E. Cranial and maxillofacial epithesis treatment of osseointegrated implants: concepts and principles. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 552-554.
  2. Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 352-363. Sipahi C. İmplant destekli çene-yüz protezlerinde retansiyon prensipleri. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi 2006; 48: 119-124
  3. Roumanas ED, Freymiller EG, Chang TL, Aghaloo T, Beumer J III. İmplant- retained prostheses for facial defects: An up to 14-year follow-up report on the survival rates of implants at UCLA. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:325-332
  4. Ali A, Patton DW, Fardy MJ. Prosthodontic rehabilitation in the maxilla following treatment of oral cancer. Dent Update 1984;21:282-286
  5. Minsley GE, Warren DW, Hinton V. Physiologic responses to maxillary resection and subsequent obturation. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:338-344 Lucas RB. Ameloblastoma. In: Pathology of the Oral Diseases, ed 4. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1984:31-60
  6. Curtis TA, Beumer J III. Restoration of acquired hard palate defects:Etiology, disability and rehabilitation. In: Beumer J III, Curtis TA, Marunick MT (eds). Maxillofacial Rehabilitation: Prosthodontic and Surgical Considerations. St Louis: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, 1996:225-284
  7. Rieger J, Wolfaardt J, Seikaly H, Jha N. Speech outcomes in patients rehabilitated with maxillry obturator prostheses after maxillectomy: A 25. Özdemir AK, Coşkun A, Tunalı A, Yaluğ S. Maksiler prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15:139- 144 Emily AT, Jack L. Acoustic analyses of speech changes after maxillectomy and prosthodontic management. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 449-455
  8. Gay WD, King GE: Applying basic prosthodontic principles in the dentulous maxillectomy patient. J Prosthet Dent 43: 433, 1980 Keyf F. Obturator prostheses for hemimaxillectomy patients. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2001; 28(9): 821-830
  9. Chalian AV, Drane JB, Standish SM. Maxillofacial Prosthetics. Multidisiplinary practice. The Williams& Wilkins Co, Baltimore, 1971: 133-148
  10. Beumer J III, Curtis TA, Firtell DN. Maxillofacial Rehabilitation. Prosthodontic and surgical considerations. The C.V. Mosby Co., St Louis, 1979: 188-243
  11. Muğan, N