SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2013 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

An In Vitro Evaluation Of Adhesive Strength Of The Simple Space Maintainers On Different Decidious Teeth Surfaces

Farklı Ayak Süt Dişi Yüzeylerine Basit Sabit Yer Tutucuların Bağlanma Güçlerinin İn-Vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Sera DERELİOĞLU
Prof. Dr. Yücel YILMAZ
Dr. Dt. M. Elçin YÜKSEL
Pages
172–176
Publication Date
2013-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When fracture modes were compared, no statistically significant difference was found (P>0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bonding of simple space maintainers to different surfaces of primary teeth with a flowable composite resin, in vitro.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The samples were prepared for teeth surfaces with rectangular wire 0.54x0.63 mm in dimentions and bonded to the surfaces satisfied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When fracture modes were compared, no statistically significant difference was found (P>0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Basit sabit yer tutucu · akıcı kompozit rezin · Simple space maintainers

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bonding of simple space maintainers to different surfaces of primary teeth with a flowable composite resin, in vitro. For this reason, recently extracted maxillary-mandibulary deciduous canines and maxillary-mandibulary primary II. molars were used equal numbers. The samples were prepared for teeth surfaces with rectangular wire 0.54x0.63 mm in dimentions and bonded to the surfaces satisfied. The prepared samples were termocycled in water baths between 5-56C for 500 cycles, and teeth were subjected to resistance test against pressure with a cross-head speed 0.5 inch/min by using Hounsfield Tensometer. The data obtained was analyzed with the One-way ANOVA test statistically significant difference, between groups (P>0.05). When fracture modes were compared, no statistically significant difference was found (P>0.05).

Özet

Çalışmamızın amacı, basit sabit yer tutucuların akıcı bir kompozit rezin(Tetric Flow) ile farklı süt dişi yüzeylerine bağlanma güçlerinin in-vitro olarak değerlendirmektir. Bu amaç için, kısa bir süre önce çekilmiş eşit sayıda alt-üst süt kanin dişleri ve alt-üst süt II. azı dişleri kullanılmıştır. Diş yüzeylerine 0,53x0,64 mm köşeli telden yer tutucu modeller hazırlanmış ve akıcı kompozit rezin kullanılarak uygun duruma getirilmiş yüzeylere yapıştırılmıştır. Hazırlanan örneklere 500 kez ısı banyosu uygulanmış ve daha sonra, örnekler Hounsfield Tensometresi kullanılarak 0,5 inch/dk’lık başlık hızı ile basınca karşı direnç testine tabi tutulmuşlardır. Elde edilen verilere tek yönlü variyans analizi uygulanmış ve gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak önemli bir farklılık belirlenememiştir (P>0,05). Ayrıca, başarısızlık şekilleri arasında da farklılık bulunmamıştır(P>0,05).

🔖

Cite This Article

DERELİOĞLU, Y. D. D. S., YILMAZ, P. D. Y., YÜKSEL, D. D. M. E. (2013). An In Vitro Evaluation Of Adhesive Strength Of The Simple Space Maintainers On Different Decidious Teeth Surfaces. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 172–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/736149

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The use of space maintainers at a UK pediatric dentistry department. ASDC J Dent Child 1999; 66:383-6
  2. Hoffding J, Kisling E. Premature loss of primary teeth: part II, the specific effects on occlusion and space in the permanent dentition. ASDC J Dent Child 1978; 45:284-7
  3. Croll TP. Light-hardened luting cement for orthodontic bands and appliances. Pediatr Dent 1999; 21:121-3
  4. Hill CJ, Sorenson HW, Mink JR. Space maintenance in a child dental care program. J Am Dent Assoc 1975; 90:811-5
  5. Kisling E, Hİffding J. Premature loss of primary teeth: part IV, a clinical control of Sannerud's space maintainer, type I. ASDC J Dent Child 1979;46:109-13
  6. Wright GZ, Kennedy DB. Space control in the primary and mixed dentitions. Dent Clin North Am. 1978; 22:579-601
  7. Bayardo RE. Anterior space maintainer and regainer. J Dent Child 1986; 53: 452-455
  8. Croll TP. Prevention of gingival submerge of fized unilateral space maintainer. J Dent Child 1982; 49: 48-51
  9. Prush RJ. The use of stainless steel crowns in the construction of space mainteiners. J Dent Child 1978; 45: 37-39
  10. Mockers O, Deroze D, Camps J. Cytotoxicity of orthodontic bands, brackets and archwires in vitro. Dent Mater 2002; 18:311-7
  11. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34:849-53
  12. Bowen RL. Properties of a silica-reinforced polymer for dental restorations. Journal of American Dental Association 1963; 66:57-64
  13. Swaine TJ, Wright GZ. Direct bonding applied to space maintenance. ASDC J Dent Child 1976; 43:401-5
  14. Yilmaz Y, Kocogullari ME, Belduz N. Fixed space maintainers combined with open-face stainless steel crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7:95 15- Kargul B, Caglar E, Kabalay U. Glass fiber reinforced composite resin space maintainer: case reports. J Dent Child (Chic) 2003; 70:258 16- Kırzıoğlu Z, Yılmaz Y. Kompozit reçine ile yapıştırılan basit yer tutucuların uzun süreli gözlemlenmesi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 1999; 9: 47-53
  15. Simsek S, Yilmaz Y, Gurbuz T. Clinical evaluation of simple fixed space maintainers bonded with flow composite resin. J Dent Child (Chic) 2004; 7:16318- Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129:567-77
  16. Whittaker D. Structural variations in the surface zone human tooth enamel observed by scanning electron microsc