Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2013 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

Farklı oral hijyen motivasyon yöntemlerinin sabit ortodontik tedavi gören bireylerin

Pages
307–312
Publication Date
2013-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Except the halitosis values, the decrease amount of the clinical parameters were different significantly between the groups (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Various oral hygiene motivation methods were proposed to prevent periodontal diseases and caries before and during the orthodontic therapy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Forty subjects (21 male, 19 female) were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Except the halitosis values, the decrease amount of the clinical parameters were different significantly between the groups (P
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ortodontik tedavi · halitozis · oral hijyen motivasyonu

Abstract

Purpose: Various oral hygiene motivation methods were proposed to prevent periodontal diseases and caries before and during the orthodontic therapy. In this study, it was aimed to compare the effects of two different oral hygiene motivation methods on halitosis level in patients treated by fixed orthodontic therapy. Materials and Methods: Forty subjects (21 male, 19 female) were included in this study. The subjects were divided into two groups as verbal (V) and demonstration with models and application under clinician’s guidance (M). The gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), percentage of bleeding sites (%BOP) and halitosis levels were recorded at baseline and 1 month after the orthodontic therapy began. The comparisons between the groups were analyzed by using Mann Whitney U test and intra-group differences were determined by using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. The correlations were investigated by using the Spearman correlation test. Results: Baseline values of the recorded parameters were not found to be different significantly between the groups (P>0.05). All of the parameters in the V group have decreased significantly after 1 month (P0.025). Except the halitosis values, the decrease amount of the clinical parameters were different significantly between the groups (P

Özet

Amaç: Ortodontik tedavi öncesinde ve sırasında plak birikimine bağlı olan periodontal hastalıkların ve çürüklerin önlenebilmesi için bireylere oral hijyen motivasyonu yapılmaktadır. Bu çalışma ile sabit ortodontik tedavi gören bireylerde iki farklı motivasyon yönteminin halitozis düzeyine etkilerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 40 birey (21 erkek, 19 kadın) katıldı. Sabit ortodontik tedavilerine başlanmadan önce bireyler oral hijyen motivasyon yöntemlerine göre sözel (S) ve model üzerinde gösterim ve hekim rehberliğinde uygulama (M) şeklinde iki gruba ayrıldı. Başlangıçta ve sabit ortodontik tedavinin başlamasından bir ay sonra gingival indeks (Gİ), plak indeksi (Pİ), sondlamada kanama yüzdesi (SK%) ve halitozis düzeyleri kaydedildi. Gruplar arasındaki farklılıklar Mann Whitney U testi ile analiz edildi ve grup içi farklılıklar her bir grupta Wilcoxon sıralı işaretler testi ile belirlendi. Korelasyonlar Spearman korelasyon testi kulanılarak araştırıldı. Bulgular: Başlangıç ölçümlerinde herhangi bir parametrede gruplar arası anlamlı farklılık belirlenmedi (P>0,05). S grubunda kaydedilen parametrelerin hepsi 1. ayda başlangıç ölçümlerinden anlamlı derecede azalma gösterdi (P0,025). Halitozis haricinde iki grupta klinik parametrelerde oluşan azalma miktarları birbirinden anlamlı derecede farklıydı (P

🔖

Cite This Article

AY, D. D. Z. Y., ESENLİK, D., ÇAĞLAR, D. (2013). Farklı oral hijyen motivasyon yöntemlerinin sabit ortodontik tedavi gören bireylerin. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 307–312. https://ajindex.com/articles/736133

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Pham TAV, Ueno M, Zaitsu T, Takehara S, Shinada K, Lam PH, Kawaguchi Y. Clinical trial of oral malodor treatment in patients with periodontal diseases. J Periodont Res 2011; 46: 722–9.
  2. Tangerman A, Winkel EG. Intra- and extra-oral halitosis: finding of a new form of extra-oral bloodborne halitosis caused by dimethyl sulphide. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 748–55.
  3. Scully C, Greenman J. Halitology (breath odour: aetiopathogenesis and management. Oral Dis 2012;18: 333–45. Tangerman A. Halitosis in medicine: a review. Int Dent J 2002; 52: 201-6.
  4. Torresyap G, Haffajee AD, Uzel NG, Socransky SS. Relationship between periodontal pocket sulfide levels and subgingival species. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 1003-10.
  5. Ousehal L, Lazrak L, Es-Said R, Hamdoune H, Elquars F, Khadija A. Evaluation of dental plaque control in patients wearing fixed orthodontic appliances: a clinical study. Int Orthod 2011; 9: 140Huber SJ, Vernino AR, Nanda RS. Professional prophylaxis and its effect on the periodontium of full-banded orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 1972; 42: 26-34.
  6. Yeung SC, Howell S, Fahey P. Oral hygiene program for orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 96: 208-13. Boyd RL. Longitudinal evaluation of a system for self-monitoring plaque control effectiveness in orthodontic patients. J Clin Periodontol 1983; 10: 380McGlynn FD, Le Compte EJ, Thomas RG, Courts FJ, Melamed BG. Effect of behavioral selfmanagement on oral hygiene adherence among orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod 1987; 91: 321 Lees A, Rock WP. A comparison between written, verbal, and videotape oral hygiene instruction for patients with fixed appliances. J Orthod 2000; 27: 323Yetkin Ay Z, Sayın MÖ, Özat Y, Sert T, Kırzıoğlu FY. Tekrarlı oral hijyen motivasyon yöntemlerinin sabit ortodontik tedavi gören adölesanların plak ve inflamasyon belirteçleri üzerine etkisi. SDÜ Sağ Bil Enst Derg 2011; 2: 16-24.
  7. Ay ZY, Sayin MO, Ozat Y, Goster T, Atilla AO, Bozkurt FY. Appropriate oral hygiene motivation method for patients with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod 2007; 77: 1085-9.
  8. Lundgren T, Mobilia A, Hallström H, Egelberg J. Evaluation of tongue coating indices. Oral Dis 2007; 13: 177–80.
  9. Van Tornout M, Dadamio J, Coucke W, Quirynen M. Tongue coating: related factors. J Clin Periodontol 2013; 40: 180–5.
  10. Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963; 21: 533–51.
  11. Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene