SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2015 / Supplement 12

EVALUATION OF THE CYTOTOXICITY OF MATERIALS USED IN ORTHODONTICS

ORTODONTİDE KULLANILAN MALZEMELERİN SİTOTOKSİSİTESİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Cafer KARAKAŞ
Elçin ESENLİK
Pages
123–131
Publication Date
2015-11-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Key-words: Orthodontic materials, bio-compatibility, cytotoxicity

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The defining the cytotoxicity of dental materials is of great important to ensure the safe treatment of patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Cytotoxicity is defined as damaging the cell structure and function as a result of inhibition of the synthesis of various macromolecules.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Key-words: Orthodontic materials, bio-compatibility, cytotoxicity
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ortodontik materyal · biyouyumluluk · sitotoksisite

Abstract

The defining the cytotoxicity of dental materials is of great important to ensure the safe treatment of patients. Cytotoxicity is defined as damaging the cell structure and function as a result of inhibition of the synthesis of various macromolecules. Cytotoxicity mechanisms are focused on oxidative stress and corrosion. Mechanisms of oxidative stress show effects as mutations resulted from free radicals production and DNA damage; mechanism of corrosion exhibits metal ion release as well. The most common materials used in orthodontics are; arch wires, brackets, adhesives and resin bonding agents, mini implants, acrylic resins, elastomeric materials, glass ionomer cements, solder alloys, magnets and Invisalign appliances. Biocompatibility of these materials depends on the metal composition,whether they are exposed to heat process, production method of them or the degree of polimerization of it. Therefore orthodontic materials should be considered in terms of cytotoxicity and ion release and certain measures should be taken for decreasing cytotoxic properties. Key-words: Orthodontic materials, bio-compatibility, cytotoxicity

Özet

Hastaların güvenli tedavisini sağlamak için, dental materyallerin sitotoksisitesini tanımlamak çok önemlidir. Sitotoksisite, çeşitli makromoleküllerin sentezlenmesinin engellenmesi sonucu hücrenin fonksiyonlarında ve yapısında hasar meydana gelmesidir. Sitotoksisite mekanizmaları; oksidatif stres ve korozyon odaklıdır. Oksidatif stres mekanizması serbest radikal üretimi ve DNA hasarı sonucu mutasyonlar ile, korozyon ise metal iyon salınımı ile etki göstermektedir. Ortodontide en sık kullanılan materyaller; ark telleri, braketler, rezin adezivler ve bonding ajanlar, mini implantlar, akrilik rezinler, elastomerik maddeler, cam iyonomer simanlar, lehim alaşımlar, magnetler ve invisalign apareylerdir. Bu materyallerin biyo-uyumlulukları metal kompozisyo- nuna, ısıl işlem görüp görmediğine, üretim yöntemine veya polimerizasyon derecesine bağlıdır. Bu nedenle ortodontik malzemeler sitotoksisite ve iyon salınımı açısından iyi değerlendirilmeli ve sitotoksik özellikleri azaltmak için bazı önlemler alınmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKAŞ, C., ESENLİK, E. (2015). EVALUATION OF THE CYTOTOXICITY OF MATERIALS USED IN ORTHODONTICS. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Supplement 12, 123–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/735948

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Murray PE, García Godoy C, García Godoy F. How is the biocompatibilty of dental biomaterials evaluated? Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal24. 2007;12(3):258-66.
  2. Mitchell R, Cotran R. Cell injury, adaptation and death. In: Kumar V, Cotran R, Robbins S, editors. Robbins basic pathology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2003. p. 4-11. 3. Pilger A, Rüdiger HW. 8-Hydroxy-2’- deoxyguanosine as a marker of oxidative DNA damage related to occupational and environmental exposures. Int Arch Occup Environ Health Spalj S, Zrinski MM, Spalj VT. In-vitro assesment of oxidative stress generated by orthodontic archwires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141:583-9.
  3. Çiftçi ZZ, Kırzıoğlu Z, Nazıroğlu M. Effects of prenatal and postnatal exposure of Wi-Fi on development of teeth and changes in teeth element concentration in rats: Wi-Fi (2.45 GHz) and teeth element concentrations. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2015;163:193-201.
  4. Çiğ B, Nazıroğlu M. Investigation of the effects of distance from sources on apoptosis, oxidative stress and cytosolic calcium accumulation via TRPV1 channels induced by mobile phones and Wi- Fi in breast cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;10-4C:2-8.
  5. Hafez HS, Selim EM, Kamel Eid FH. Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and metal release in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances: a longitudinal in-vivo study. Orthop. 2011;140(3):298-30. Orthod Dentofacial Matasa CG. Characterization of used orthodontic brackets. In: Eliades G, Eliades T, Brantley WA, Watts DC, editors. In vivo aging of dental biomaterials. Chicago, Quintessence: 2003. p. 125- 39. Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Maffia E. Nickel release from new conventional stainless steel, recycled, and nickel-free orthodontic brackets: An in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:809-15.
  6. Hwang C, Shin J, Cha J. Metal release from simulated fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:383-91.
  7. Bishara S E, Barret R D, Selim M I. Biodegradation of orthodontic appliances Part II. Changes in the blood level of nickel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:115-9.
  8. Trombelli L, Virgili A, Corazza M, Lucci R. Systemic contact dermatitis from an orthodontic appliance. Contact Dermatitis 1992; 27:259-60. Vreeburg KJJ, von Blomberg M, Scheper RJ. Induction of immunological tolerance by oral administration of nickel and chromium. J Dent Res 1984;63:124-8.
  9. Staerkjaer L, Menne T. Nickel allergy and orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:284- 9. Torreilles J, Guerin M C, Slaoui-