Journals / Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Sayı: 13

IDEOLOGY, COMMUNICATION, CULTURE: EVALUATION OF STUART HALL

İDEOLOJİ, İLETİŞİM, KÜLTÜR: BİR STUART HALL DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Pages
139–159
Publication Date
2010-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

His dynamic approach to culture helps us to avoid essentialist generalizations regarding the cultural field

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to present a general evaluation of Stuart Hall’s contributions to studies of ideology, communication and culture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Focusing primarily on Stuart Hall’s Marxist theory of ideology and culture, the article asserts that Hall’s formulations provide the researchers with invaluable insights and clues for comprehending the complexity of the ‘social.’ His “Marxism without final guarantees” reminds us the specificity of the ideological level and underlines the need for developing a theory of ideology “adequate to the complexities of what we are trying to explain.” Hall insists that power is a central element of culture and culture plays a pivotal role in making of power relations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:His dynamic approach to culture helps us to avoid essentialist generalizations regarding the cultural field
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kültürel çalışmalar · iletişim · ideoloji

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present a general evaluation of Stuart Hall’s contributions to studies of ideology, communication and culture. Focusing primarily on Stuart Hall’s Marxist theory of ideology and culture, the article asserts that Hall’s formulations provide the researchers with invaluable insights and clues for comprehending the complexity of the ‘social.’ His “Marxism without final guarantees” reminds us the specificity of the ideological level and underlines the need for developing a theory of ideology “adequate to the complexities of what we are trying to explain.” Hall insists that power is a central element of culture and culture plays a pivotal role in making of power relations. His dynamic approach to culture helps us to avoid essentialist generalizations regarding the cultural field

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Stuart Hall’un ideoloji, iletişim ve kültür çalışmalarına katkılarının genel bir değerlendirmesini sunmaktır. Özellikle Stuart Hall’un Marksist ideoloji ve kültür kuramına katkıları üzerinde yoğunlaşan makale Hall’un formülasyonlarının araştırmacılara ‘toplumsal’ın karmaşıklığını kavramak açısından son derece değerli ipuçları sunduğunu vurgulamaktadır. Onun “nihai garantilerden yoksun Marksizm”i bize ideolojik düzeyin özgüllüğünü hatırlatmakta ve “açıklamaya çalıştığımız şeyin karmaşıklığı ile başa çıkabilecek” yeterlikte bir ideoloji kuramı geliştirmemiz gerektiğinin altını çizmektedir. Hall, iktidarın, kültürün merkezi bir öğesi olduğunu ve kültürün iktidar ilişkilerinin kuruluşunda hayati önemde rol oynadığını ısrarla vurgular. Onun kültüre dinamik yaklaşımı kültürel alan hakkında özcü genellemelerden kaçınmamıza yardımcı olur

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÇETİN, B. (2010). IDEOLOGY, COMMUNICATION, CULTURE: EVALUATION OF STUART HALL. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 13, 139–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/732212

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Althusser, Louis (2001). “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatus.” Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. B. Brewster (çev.). New York: Monthly Review Press Barrett, Michéle (1998). “Stuart Hall.” Key Sociological Thinkers. Rob Stones (der.) içinde. New York: Palgrave Buci-Glucksmann, Christine (1982). “Hegemony and Consent: A Political Strategy.” Approaches to Gramsci. A. S. Sassoon (der.) içinde. Londra: Writers and Readers. 116-127.
  2. Cohen, G. A. (2000). Karl Marx’s Understanding of History. London: Clarendon Press Davis, Helen (2004). Understanding Stuart Hall. Londra: Sage Eagleton, Terry (1997). “Ideology and its Vicissitudes in Western Marxism.” Mapping Ideology. S. Žižek (der.) içinde. Londra: Verso. 179-227.
  3. Erdoğan, Necmi (1993). “Metinlerarasılık, hegemonya ve siyasal alan.” Toplum ve Bilim, 63. 40-57.
  4. Geras, Norman (1987) “Post-Marxism”, New Left Review, 163. 40-82.
  5. Geras, Norman (1988) “Ex-Marxism without Substance”, New Left Review, 169. 34-61.
  6. Gramsci, Antonio (1978). “Some Aspects of the Southern Question”, Selections from Political Writings (1921-1926). Q. Hoare (der.) London: Lawrence and Wishart. Gramsci, Antonio (2003).
  7. Selections from the Prison Notebooks, Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith (der.). New York: International Publishers Hall, Stuart (1981a) “Notes on Deconstructing the Popular.” People’s History and Socialist Theory. R. Samuel (der.) içinde. Londra: Routledge. 227-239.
  8. Hall, Stuart (1981b) “Cultural Studies: Two Paradigms.” Culture, Ideology and Social Process. T. Bennett v.d. (der.) içinde. Londra: Open University Press. 19-39.
  9. Hall, Stuart (1985) “Signification, Representation, Ideology: Althusser and the PostStructuralist Debates.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication. 2(2), Temmuz. 91-114.
  10. Hall, Stuart (1988a). The Hard Road to Renewal: Thatcherism and the Crisis of the Left. New York: Verso Hall, Stuart (1988b). “The Toad in the Garden: Thatcherism among the Theorists.” Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. C. Nelson ve L. Grosssberg (der.) içinde. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. 35-75.
  11. Hall, Stuart (1996). “The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees.” Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. Morley and Chen (der.) içinde. Londra: Routledge. 25-47.
  12. Hall, Stuart (1997) “İdeoloji ve İletişim Kuramı.” Medya, Kültür, Siyaset. Süleyman İrvan (der.) içinde. Ankara: Ark. 79-99.
  13. Hall, Stuart (1999a). “İdeolojinin Yeniden Keşfi: Medya Çalışmalarında Baskı Altında Tutulanın Geri Dönüşü.”