SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

A Methodology for Explicit Representation Of The Stochastic Demand Due To Electric Vehicles in Generation Expansion Planning Problems

Hatice TEKİNER MOGULKOC
Pages
257–263
Publication Date
2021-05-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that GEP models with selected demand curves produce more realistic decisions (closer to the solutions obtained by using the entire demand patterns) than the decisions obtained by the models with average EVs demand.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Generation expansion planning (GEP) problems are solved to find the optimum investment decisions to satisfy the increasing electricity demand.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Integration of electric vehicles (EVs) with the capability of charging from the grid will also increase the electricity demand of the grid.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that GEP models with selected demand curves produce more realistic decisions (closer to the solutions obtained by using the entire demand patterns) than the decisions obtained by the models with average EVs demand.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Generation Expansion Planning · Electric Vehicles · Demand Stochasticity

Abstract

Generation expansion planning (GEP) problems are solved to find the optimum investment decisions to satisfy the increasing electricity demand. Integration of electric vehicles (EVs) with the capability of charging from the grid will also increase the electricity demand of the grid. Depending on the charging/driving characteristics of users, demand curves for EVs will be shaped and it will be different on each day. Therefore, it is very crucial to represent this stochastic nature of EVs demand in the associated GEP problems. This paper is proposing a methodology to represent EVs demand realistically on GEP models. The proposed methodology starts with generating random demand patterns to demonstrate possibilities for the EVs demand patterns via Monte Carlo Simulation, then using an optimization-based model to select a representative set. Two stage stochastic programming model is proposed for GEP problems and solved to minimize the expected cost over the entire set, the representative set and the average EVs demand. The results show that GEP models with selected demand curves produce more realistic decisions (closer to the solutions obtained by using the entire demand patterns) than the decisions obtained by the models with average EVs demand. In most cases, the models using average EVs demand fail to capture the new peaks generated by EVs, therefore, they suggest less capacity expansion then the required amount. This results in more unmet demand in the system.

🔖

Cite This Article

MOGULKOC, H. T. (2021). A Methodology for Explicit Representation Of The Stochastic Demand Due To Electric Vehicles in Generation Expansion Planning Problems. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 257–263. https://ajindex.com/articles/730608

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. IEA, World Energy Outlook, 2019. (Visited on December, 25 2019). N.E. Koltsaklis and A.S. Dagoumas, “State-of-the-art generation expansion planning: A review”, Applied Energy, vol. 230, pp. 563–589, 2018. A.S. Dagoumas and N.E. Koltsaklis, “Review of models for integrating renewable energy in the generation expansion planning”, Applied Energy, vol. 242, pp. 1573–1587, 2019.
  2. J.C. Kelly, J.S. MacDonald and G.A. Keoleian, “Time-dependent plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging based on national driving patterns and demographics”, Applied Energy, vol. 94, pp. 395-405, 2012.
  3. S. Shafiee, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad and M. Rastegar, “Investigating the impacts of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on power distribution systems”, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 4, no 3, pp. 1351-1360, 2013.
  4. J. Jung, Y. Cho, D. Cheng, A. Onen, R. Arghandeh, M. Dilek and R.P. Broadwater, “Monte Carlo analysis of plug-in hybrid vehicles and distributed energy resource growth with residential energy storage in Michigan”, Applied Energy, vol. 108, pp. 218-235, 2013.
  5. B. Yagcitekin, M. Uzunoglu, A. Karakas and O. Erdinc, “Assessment of electrically-driven vehicles in terms of emission impacts and energy requirements: a case study for Istanbul, Turkey”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 96, pp. 486-492, 2015.
  6. R. Godina, E.M.G. Rodrigues, N.G. Paterakis,, O. Erdinc and J.P.S. Catalão, “Innovative impact assessment of electric vehicles charging loads on distribution transformers using real data”, Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 120, pp. 206-216, 2016.
  7. J. Su, T.T. Lie and R. Zamora, “Modelling of large-scale electric vehicles charging demand: A New Zealand case study”, Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 167, pp. 171-182, 2019. X. Yu, “Impacts assessment of PHEV charge profiles on generation expansion using national energy modeling system”, Power and Energy Society General Meeting-Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century, IEEE, pp. 1-5, (2008).
  8. M.D. Galus, M. Zima and G. Andersson, “On integration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles into existing power system structures”, Energy Policy, vol. 38, no 11, pp. 6736-6745, 2010.
  9. A.H. Hajimiragha, C.A. Cañizares, W. Michael, M.W. Fowler, S. Moazeni and A. Elkamel, “A Robust Optimization Approach for Planning the Transition to Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no 4, pp. 2264 – 2274, 2011.
  10. P. Vithayasrichareon, G. Mills and I.F. MacGill, “Impact of Electric Vehicles and Sola