SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 8

BALANCE OF POWER IN CENTRAL ASIA AFTER THE US-LED INTERVENTION IN AFGHANISTAN 2001

ABD Önderliğinde 2001 Yılında Yapılan Afganistan Müdahalesi Sonrası Orta Asya’da Güç Dengesi

Selçuk DENEK
Pages
305–323
Publication Date
2016-12-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, this study tries to explore the US-led intervention in Afghanistan, the balance of power in Central Asia, Georgian War and Shanghai Cooperation Organization which are related to this balance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After Cold War, the USA felt that a new enemy and target had to be found.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For that reason US started to invade Afghanistan by using the 9/11 as a cause to reach its goals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, this study tries to explore the US-led intervention in Afghanistan, the balance of power in Central Asia, Georgian War and Shanghai Cooperation Organization which are related to this balance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Afganistan Müdahalesi · 11 Eylül · Şangay İş Birliği Örgütü

Abstract

After Cold War, the USA felt that a new enemy and target had to be found. For that reason US started to invade Afghanistan by using the 9/11 as a cause to reach its goals. With these incidents, it is daclared that Afghanistan is the house of terrorism and this terrorism had to be destroyed. But the main reason is to control Central Asia and the region. As a result, this study tries to explore the US-led intervention in Afghanistan, the balance of power in Central Asia, Georgian War and Shanghai Cooperation Organization which are related to this balance.

Özet

Soğuk savaş sonrasında, ABD kendisine yeni bir düşman ve hedef bulmak zorunda olduğunu hissetmiştir. ABD 11 Eylül olaylarını da bahane ederek bu hedefini gerçekleştirmek için Afganistana müdahalede bulunmaya başlamıştır. Bu olaylarla birlikte Afganistan terörün yuvası olarak lanse edilmiş ve bu terörizmin yok edilmesi gerektiği dile getirilmiştir. Fakat burada temel amacın Orta Asyayı kontrol etmek olduğunun ifade edilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu varsayımdan hareketle bu çalışmayı ortaya koyma ihtiyacını hissettik. Çalışmamızda 11 Eylül sonrasında gerçekleşen ABD önderliğindeki Afganistan müdahalesini, bu müdahale sonrasında Orta Asyadaki güç dengesini ve bu dengeyle yakından ilişkisi olduğunu düşündüğümüz Gürcistan Savaşını ve Şangay İş Birliği Örgütünü inceleyeceğiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

DENEK, S. (2016). BALANCE OF POWER IN CENTRAL ASIA AFTER THE US-LED INTERVENTION IN AFGHANISTAN 2001. Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 8, 305–323. https://ajindex.com/articles/730139

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Amanov, Satlik. (2011). An Assessment on the Historical Characteristic of US and Central Asia Relations. Changing Geo-Politics of Eurasia in the Global Power Struggle: New Great Game, edited by Mehmet Seyfettin Erol, Baris Press, Ankara, pp.131-186.
  2. Ari, Tayyar and Pirincci, Ferhat. (2010). The Central Asia Policy of US in the Shadow of 9/11. From Competition to Cooperation: Central Asia and Caucasus, edited by Tayyar Ari, MKM Press, Bursa, pp.300-302.
  3. Atay, Mehmet. (2002). In the Beginning of 21. Century, the New GeoPolitic Position of Turkey and Central Asia. Geo-Politic (Jeopolitik), volume: 1, no: 2, pp.37-45.
  4. Ayhan, Veysel. (2004). The Central Asia and Caucasus Policy of US in the Framework of Oil-Politic Dynamics and the Role of Turkey. 1. National Young Scientists Symposium of Uludag University, Volume: 2, No: 7, pp. 837-864.
  5. Bursa. Ayub, Fatima and Kouvo, Sari. (2008). Righting the Course? Humanitarian Intervention, the War on Terror and the Future of Afghanistan. International Affairs 84: 4, pp. 641–657.
  6. Blagov, Sergei. (2004).
  7. With Eye on US, Russia Bolsters Central Asia Presence. Eurasia Insight. Access: http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav062204a.shtml.
  8. Blagov, Sergei. (2008). Medvedev Kicks Off Kazakhstan Courtship. Eurasia Insight. Access: http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav051508.shtml. 8.Blank, Stephen. (2007). It’s Time to Pay Attention to Russian Military Reforms. Eurasia Insight. Access: http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav010407a.shtml.
  9. Blank, Stephen. (2008). Russian-Indian Row over Tajik Base Suggests Moscow Caught in Diplomatic Vicious Cycle. Eurasia Insight. Access: http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav011108f.shtml.
  10. Buyukbas, Murat. (2006). US Intervention to Afghanistan and (Newly Emerged) Administration Structure in Afghanistan. Master Degree Dissertation. University of Suleyman Demirel, Social Sciences Institute, Isparta. Celikpala, Mitat. (2010). Turkey and the Caucasus: Transition from Reactive Foreign Policy to Proactive Rhythmic Diplomacy. International Relations (Uluslararasi Iliskiler), volume: 7, no: 25, pp. 93-126.
  11. Chang, Gordon G. (2007). How China and Russia Threaten the World. Commentary, volume: 123, no: 6. Cinar, Burak. (2008). Third Power in History and Energy Wars in Central Asia. Journal of Security Strategies (Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi), issue: 08, pages: 21-43.
  12. Degimencioglu, Ilhami B. (2007). Power which is Left with No