Journals / Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

THE NORTH-SOUTH ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A THEORETICAL EXAMINATION

KUZEY-GÜNEY EKONOMİK ENTEGRASYONU: TEORİK BİR İNCELEME

Pages
523–538
Publication Date
2022-10-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained from the research, it is shown that the developed countries benefit from the large markets of the developing countries among the reasons for the establishment of North-South economic integrations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to examine the theories that try to explain North-South economic integrations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, a literature review including North-South economic integration studies is examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained from the research, it is shown that the developed countries benefit from the large markets of the developing countries among the reasons for the establishment of North-South economic integrations.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kuzey-Güney Anlaşmaları · Ekonomik Entegrasyon · Bölgesel Ticaret Anlaşmaları

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to examine the theories that try to explain North-South economic integrations. In this context, a literature review including North-South economic integration studies is examined. It is researched why developed countries have established regional trade agreements with developing countries and what are the positive and negative effects of these integrations on the economies of developing countries. According to the results obtained from the research, it is shown that the developed countries benefit from the large markets of the developing countries among the reasons for the establishment of North-South economic integrations. The aim of developing countries is to realize economic development due to industrialization and economic growth. As a result of the literature review, it has been determined that economic integrations have positive and negative advantages on the economy of the developing country.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı Kuzey Güney ekonomik entegrasyonlarını açıklamaya çalışan teorileri incelemektir. Bu kapsamda Kuzey Güney ekonomik entegrasyon çalışmalarını içeren literatür araştırması incelenmektedir. Gelişmiş ülkelerin gelişmekte olan ülkelerle neden bölgesel ticaret anlaşmalarını kurdukları ve söz konusu entegrasyonların gelişmekte olan ülkelerin ekonomileri üzerindeki olumlu ve olumsuz etkilerinin neler olduğu araştırılmaktadır. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuca göre Kuzey-Güney ekonomik entegrasyonların kurulma sebepleri arasında gelişmiş ülkelerin, gelişmekte olan ülkelerin geniş piyasalarından yararlanması gösterilmektedir. Gelişmekte olan ülkelerin amacı ise, sanayileşme, ekonomik büyüme dolayısıyla iktisadi kalkınmayı gerçekleştirmektir. Literatür incelemeleri sonucunda ekonomik entegrasyonların gelişmekte olan ülke ekonomisi üzerinde olumlu ve olumsuz avantajlara sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNDAL, B. (2022). THE NORTH-SOUTH ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A THEORETICAL EXAMINATION. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 523–538. https://ajindex.com/articles/729460

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Balassa, B. (1961). The Theory of Economic Integration. 117 Bhagwati, J. (1991). Regionalism versus Multılateralısm. The World economy Vol. 15(5): 535-555
  2. Burfisher, M.E., Robinson, S., ve Thierfelder, K., (2003). Regionalism: Old and new, theory and practice. Paper prepared for presentation to the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium (IATRC) Conference, Italy. Carpenter, T. (2009). A historical Perspective on Regıonalısm, Baldwin Richard ve Patric Low (ed) Multilateralizing Regıonalism içinde (13-27). New York: Cambridge Unıversıty Press, 2009, s: 16-18
  3. Coque, J. M. G. A (2002). Agricultural Trade and the barcelona process: Is full liberalization possible?. European Review of Agricultural Economics 29 (3): 399–422
  4. Corden, W.M.( 1972). Economies of Scale and Customs Union Theory. Journal of Political Economy. 8(3), 465-475
  5. Cieslik, A. ve Hagemejer, J. (2009). Assessing the ımpact of the EU-sponsored trade liberalization in the MENA countries. Journal of Economic Integration 24(2): 343-368
  6. El-Agraa, A.M. (1988). The Theory of Economic Integration. In: El-Agraa, A.M. (eds) International Economic Integration. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09163-8_2
  7. Fernandez, R, (1997). Returns to regionalism: An evaluation of nontraditional gains from regional trade agreements. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no.1816. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Fink, C.(2011). Intellectual property Rights. Jean-Pierre Chauffour, Jean-Christophe Maur (Ed.), Preferential Trade Agreement Policies For Development içinde (387-405), ABD: The World Bank Washıngton D.C. 387 Garcia, F. J. (2007). Is Free Trade 'Free?' Is it Even 'Trade?' Oppression and Consent in Hemispheric Trade Agreements, Seattle Journal for Social Justice. 5(2), 1-26.
  8. Gehrels, F.(1956). Customs Unions from A Single-Country Viewpoint, The Review of Economic Studies, 24 (1), 61-64.
  9. Gibbs, M. ve Wagle, S. (2005). The great maze: regional and bilateral free trade agreements in Asia. Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Initiative, UNDP Regional Center, Colombo. Grossman, G. ve E. Helpman (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  10. Hoekman, B.( 2011). Nourth-South preferentıal trade agreements. Jean-Pierre Chauffour, Jean-Christophe Maur (Ed.), Preferential Trade Agreement Policies For Development içinde (95-110.ss), ABD: The World Bank Washıngton D.C. Hoekman, B (2005).Designing North South trade agreements to promote economic development Worl