Journals / Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research / 2021 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of KNN and DNN Classifiers Performance in Predicting Mobile Phone Price Ranges

Pages
19–28
Publication Date
2021-01-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, at another stage of the study, the price range for 1000 devices with different features was determined by using a test dataset that was not labeled, and the results produced by both models were compared.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to compare the classification performances of K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) models in a dataset.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It includes 20 different features of mobile phones such as battery power, Bluetooth function, memory capacity, screen size.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, at another stage of the study, the price range for 1000 devices with different features was determined by using a test dataset that was not labeled, and the results produced by both models were compared.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Classification · Deep Neural Networks · KNN

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the classification performances of K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) models in a dataset. For this purpose, the “mobile price forecast" dataset has been selected. It includes 20 different features of mobile phones such as battery power, Bluetooth function, memory capacity, screen size. The problem presented in the dataset is to determine the price range class before the mobile phones are released. Such a forecast will help companies that manufacture mobile devices to estimate the price of their mobile phones in a more convenient method to compete against their competitors in the market. In the implementation phase of the study, the KNN and DNN models were created in Python 3.6 with the Sklearn and Keras libraries. The classification performances of the models were determined using F-1 score, accuracy, recall and accuracy measurements. As a result of the study, validation data was classified with 92% accuracy using the trained DNN model. In addition, at another stage of the study, the price range for 1000 devices with different features was determined by using a test dataset that was not labeled, and the results produced by both models were compared.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜVENÇ, E., ÇETİN, G., KOÇAK, H. (2021). Comparison of KNN and DNN Classifiers Performance in Predicting Mobile Phone Price Ranges. Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 19–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/729011

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Guo J., Wang X., "Image Classification Based on SURF and KNN", International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), Beijing, China, 2019.
  2. Öztürk A., Durak U., and Badıllı F., "Twitter Verilerinden Doğal Dil İşleme ve Makine Öğrenmesi ile Hastalık Tespiti", Konya Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol 8(4), pp. 839 - 852, 2020.
  3. Uğuz S., Oral O., and Çağlayan N., "PV Güç Santrallerinden Elde Edilecek Enerjinin Makine Öğrenmesi Metotları Kullanılarak Tahmin Edilmesi", Uluslararası Mühendislik Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi, vol 11(3), pp. 769-799, 2019.
  4. Manzak D., Çetinel G., and Manzak A., "Automated Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease using Deep Neural Network (DNN) by Random Forest Feature Elimination", The 14th International Conference on Computer Science & Education, Toronto, Canada, 2019.
  5. Paltrinieri N., Comfort L., ve Reniers G., "Learning about risk: Machine learning for risk assessment", Safety Science, vol 118, pp. 475-486, 2019. Maehashi K., and Shintani M., "Macroeconomic forecasting using factor models and machine learning: an application to Japan", Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, vol 58, 2020. Pondhu L. N. and Kummari G., "Performance Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Gender Classification", 2nd International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies, 2018. Aydoğan M. and Karci A., "Makine Öğrenmesi ve Transfer Öğrenme ile Türkçe Metin Sınıflandırma", International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing, Malatya, Turkey, 2019. Taneja S., and Gupta C., "An Enhanced K-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm Using Information Gain and Clustering", Fourth International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies, 2014.
  6. Li H., Jiang H., Wang D., and Han B., "An Improved KNN Algorithm for Text Classification", Eighth International Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control, 2018.
  7. Sarma M. S., Srinivas Y., Abhiram M., Prasanthi M. S. and Ramya M. S. L., "KNN File Classification for Securing Cloud Infrastructure", 2nd IEEE International Conference On Recent Trends In Electronics Information & Communication Technology, India, 2017. Manjusha M., and Harikumar R., "Performance Analysis of KNN Classifier and K-Means Clustering for Robust Classification of Epilepsy from EEG Signals", International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), 2016. Ser G., and C. T. Bati, "Derin Si