Journals / Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni / 2014 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

-

Spot İdrarda Bakılan 5-Hi̇droksi̇ İndol Aseti̇k Asi̇ti̇n Akut Apandi̇si̇t Tanısında Değeri (The Value of Acute Appendicitis Viewed 5-Hydroxy Indole Acetic Acid in Spot Urine)

Pages
94–99
Publication Date
2014-07-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sensitivity, specifity, positive predictive value and diagnostic specificity of 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid level in spot urine were 63%, 66%, 54%, 73%, respectively.Conclusion: Spot urine 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid levels in diagnosis of acute appendicitis seems to have limited diagnostic power as a single parameter in children.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Backgraund/Aim: This study is to investigate the significance of spot urine 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid levels in patients admitted with the suspicion of acute apendicitis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material/Method: Between January 2011 and June 2011, patients with the complaints of abdominal pain were evaluated according to levels of 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid in urine at admission.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sensitivity, specifity, positive predictive value and diagnostic specificity of 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid level in spot urine were 63%, 66%, 54%, 73%, respectively.Conclusion: Spot urine 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid levels in diagnosis of acute appendicitis seems to have limited diagnostic power as a single parameter in children.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:akut apandisit · akut karın · 5 indol asetik asit

Abstract

Backgraund/Aim: This study is to investigate the significance of spot urine 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid levels in patients admitted with the suspicion of acute apendicitis. Material/Method: Between January 2011 and June 2011, patients with the complaints of abdominal pain were evaluated according to levels of 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid in urine at admission. This study was designed as prospectively. Results: Forthy-nine patients with the mean age of 10.4 years ±3.4 who were admitted and interned to our department during the one year period with the complaints of abdominal pain. After the clinical evaluation appendicitis was detected in 32 patients and abdominal pain was found to be due to causes other than appendicitis in 17 patients. Two of the patiens were negatif appendectomy. Spot urine samples were collected in all patients during admission and 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid levels were studied. The differences between the patients with acute appendicitis and other groups were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Sensitivity, specifity, positive predictive value and diagnostic specificity of 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid level in spot urine were 63%, 66%, 54%, 73%, respectively.Conclusion: Spot urine 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid levels in diagnosis of acute appendicitis seems to have limited diagnostic power as a single parameter in children.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma, akut apandisit şüphesi nedeniyle acile başvuran hastalarda, idrarda bakılan 5-Hidroksi İndol Asetik Asit seviyesinin tanı koymada anlamlılığını değerlendirmektedir. Yöntem: 2011 Ocak- 2011 Aralık ayları arasında kliniğimize karın ağrısı nedeniyle başvuran hastalarda idrarda 5-Hidroksi İndol Asetik Asit ileriye dönük olarak çalışma yapılmıştır.Sonuçlar: Bir yıllık sürede kliniğimize karın ağrısı nedeniyle başvuran ve interne edilen, ortalama yaşları 10.4 yıl ±3.4 olan toplam 49 hastanın klinik değerlendirme sonrası, 32 hastada apandisit, 17 hastada apandisit harici karın ağrısı tespit edilmiştir. Appendektomi yapılan 2 hastada apendiks normal olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Tüm başvuran hastalardan ilk başvuruda idrar örnekleri alınmıştır. Her 2 grup karşılaştırıldığında spot idrar 5-Hidroksi İndol Asetik Asit düzeyleri arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmamıştır (p>0.05). Spot idrar 5-Hidroksi İndol Asetik Asit düzeylerinde özgüllük, duyarlılık, pozitif öngörü değeri, negatif öngörü değeri sırasıyla %63, %66, %54 ve %73 olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Spot idrar 5-Hidroksi İndol Asetik Asit değeri çocuklarda akut apandisit tanısında tek tip parametre olarak kullanıldığında sınırlı tanısal değeri olduğu saptanmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Akut Apandisit, Akut Karın, 5 İndol Asetik Asit, Somatostatin, ÇocukABSTRACTBackgraund/Aim: This study is to investigate the significance of spot urine 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid levels in patients admitted with the suspicion of acute apendicitis. Material/Method: Between January 2011 and June 2011, patients with the complaints of abdominal pain were evaluated according to levels of 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid in urine at admission. This study was designed as prospectively. Results: Forthy-nine patients with the mean age of 10.4 years ±3.4 who were admitted and interned to our department during the one year period with the complaints of abdominal pain. After the clinical evaluation appendicitis was detected in 32 patients and abdominal pain was found to be due to causes other than appendicitis in 17 patients. Two of the patiens were negatif appendectomy. Spot urine samples were collected in all patients during admission and 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid levels were studied. The differences between the patients with acute appendicitis and other groups were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Sensitivity, specifity, positive predictive value and diagnostic specificity of 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid level in spot urine were 63%, 66%, 54%, 73%, respectively.Conclusion; Spot urine 5-hydroxy indol acetic acid levels in diagnosis of acute appendicitis seems to have limited diagnostic power as a single parameter in children.Key Words: Acut Appendicitis, Acut abdomen, 5-hydroxy indole acetic acid, Somatositatin, Child

🔖

Cite This Article

CİCİ, İ., CELAYİR, A. C., AKÇAER, V. (2014). -. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 94–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/725527

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Karnath B, Mileski W. Acute abdominal pain. Hospital Physician 2002; 45-50.
  2. Old JL, Dusing RW, Yap M, Dirks J. Imaging for suspected appendicitis. American Family Physician 2005; 71: 71-8.
  3. Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 2000; 215: 337- 48. Nussbaum MS. Disease af the appendix: In: Bell RH, Rikkers LF. Michael W.Mulholland ME (Eds). Digestive Tract Surgery A Text And Atlas. 1st edition, New York: Lippincott Williams Wilkins 1996; 1315-37.
  4. Zülfikarağlu B, Özalp N, Keşkek M, Bilgiç İ, Koç M. 80 Yaş Ve Üzerindeki Hastalarda Acil Abdominal Cerrahi. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics 2005; 8: 115-9.
  5. Matthews JB, Hodin RA. Acute abdomen and appendix. Greenfield LJ, Mulholland MW, Olfham KT, Zelenock GB, Lillemoe KD. Surgery. Scientific Principles And Practice. 4th edition, New York: Lippincott Williams Wilkins 2001; 1224-35. Gershon MD. Serotonin: Its Role End Receptors In Enteric Neurotransmission. Adv Exp Med Biol 1991; 294: 221-30. Kema IP, de Vries EG, Muskiet FA. Clinical chemistry of serotonin and metebolites. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 2000; 747: 33-48. Demeure MJ. Physiology of the APUD System. Semin Surg Oncol 1993; 9: 362-7.
  6. Lee SL, Ho HS. Acute appendicitis: is there a difference between children and adults? Am Surg. 2006 May;72(5):409-13.
  7. Grönroos JM, Grönroos P. Leucocyte count and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Britis J. Surgery 1999; 86: 501-4.
  8. Apak, S., A. Kazez, S.K. Ozel, B. Ustundag, N. Akpolat ve A. Kizirgil, “Spot Urine 5-HIAA Levels in Early Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis,” J. Pediatr. Surg, 40(9), 1436-1439 (2005).
  9. Z. Türkyılmaz, K.Sönmez, R. Karabulut, S.Elbeğ, S. Moralıoğlu, A.Demirtola, B. Demiroğulları, İ.O.Özen, AC. Başaklar & N. Kale:Sequential cytokine levels in the diagnosis of appendicitis Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2006; 66: 723–32.
  10. Kurt G, Celayir AC ve Şahin C. Klinik, Laboratuvar ve görüntüleme bulgularının çocuklarda akut apandisit tanısında güvenilirliği: Alternatif bir pediatrik apandisit skorlaması, Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni, 2011; 42(3): 137-42.
  11. Borushok KF, Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC. Sonografic diagnosis of perforation in patients with acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154(2):275-8.
  12. Bolandparvaz S, Vasie M, Owji AA at al. Urinary 5-hydoxy indole acetic acid as a test for early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Clinical Biochemistry 2004; 37: 985-9.
  13. Oruc MT, Kulah B, Ozozan O ve ark. The value 5-hydroxy indole acetic asid measurement in spot urine in diagn