SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Fe Dergi / 2010 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Gender relations regulated by customary law as reflected through legends and historical records in the Turkic societies

Destanlar ve tarihi kayıtlar ışığında farklı Türk toplumlarında cinslerarası ilişkiler

Nilgün Dalkesen
Journal
Fe Dergi
Pages
15–30
Publication Date
2010-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, I will try to show that parellel to different social, political and cultural formations in different times and different parts of Inner Asia before Islam, there were different gender relations among the Turkic societies

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:History of Turkish women have generally been examined as before and after Islam.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For these periods genaralizations are made as there was or was not any gender equality.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, I will try to show that parellel to different social, political and cultural formations in different times and different parts of Inner Asia before Islam, there were different gender relations among the Turkic societies
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Orta Asya · Türk Kadını · Altaylar

Abstract

History of Turkish women have generally been examined as before and after Islam. For these periods genaralizations are made as there was or was not any gender equality. Since there are very restricted historical sources for the pre-Islamic period, studies related to this period keep repeating each other. In this study, the legends of different Turkic societies are examined as historical sources in comparison under the light of some sociological and anthropological theories. Thus, I will try to show that parellel to different social, political and cultural formations in different times and different parts of Inner Asia before Islam, there were different gender relations among the Turkic societies

Özet

Destanlar ve tarihi kayıtlar ışığında farklı Türk toplumlarında cinslerarası ilişkiler Türk kadın tarihi genel olarak İslam öncesi ve sonrası olarak ele alınmakta ve bu dönemler için kadın- erkek ilişkilerinde eşitlik vardı veya yoktu yönünde genellemeler yapılmaktadır. Özellikle İslam öncesi dönemle ilgili yeterince kaynak bulunmaması sebebi ile bu dönemle ilgili yapılan çalışmalar birbirinin tekrarı niteliğinedir. Bu çalışmada, İslam kültür ve medeniyeti etkisi altına girmeden önce, Orta Asya’nın farklı zaman ve bölgelerinde yaşanan farklı siyasi, sosyal ve kültürel değişimlere bağlı olarak meydana gelen farklı kadın-erkek ilişkileri üzerinde durulmaktadır. Bu çerçevede farklı Türk toplumlarına ait çeşitli destanlar sosyolojik ve antropolojik verilerin ışığında karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

Dalkesen, N. (2010). Gender relations regulated by customary law as reflected through legends and historical records in the Turkic societies. Fe Dergi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 15–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/716166

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Aberle, David. “Matrilineal Descent in Cross-Cultural Perspective,” Matrilineal Kinship, ed. David M. Schneider and Kathlen Gough (Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1962), 655-731.
  2. Barstow, Anne. “The Uses of Archeology for Women’s History: James Mellaart’s Work on The Neolithic Goddess at Çatal Hüyük,” Feminist Studies (1978):7-18.
  3. Brittan, Arthur. Masculinity and Power (Oxford: Basil Blackwell Inc., 1989).
  4. Bruce, Lincoln. Myth, Cosmos and Society; Indo-European Themes of Creation and Destruction (Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1986).
  5. Davletov, Timur B (eds.). Huban Arığ: Hakas Türklerinin Kadın Yiğitlik Destanı (Ankara:Türksoy, 2006).
  6. Dedes, Yorgo (eds.). Battalname (Harvard University: The Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, 1996).
  7. Dilek, İbrahim.(eds). Altay Destanları I (Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları, 2002).
  8. Draper, Patricia. “!Kung Women: Contrast in Sexual Egalitarianism in Foraging and Sedentary Context,” Toward Anthropology of Women ed. Rayna R. Reiter(New York, London: Monthly Review Press, 1975): 77-110.
  9. Dromp, Michael R. Tang China and the Collapse of the Uighur Empire, A Documentary History (Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2005).
  10. Fischler, Susan. “Imperial Cult: Engendering the Cosmos,” When Men Were Men: Masculinity, Power&Identity in Classical Antiquity, ed. Lin Foxhall & John Salmon (London and New York: Routledge, 1998),165-184. Gerda Lerner. The Creation of Patriarchy (Oxford, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1986).
  11. Georgoudi, Stella. “Creating Myth of Matriachy,” A History of Women from Ancient Goddesses to Christian Saints, vol.1 ed. Christiane Klapisch-Zuber (London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2000), 449-463.
  12. Goody, Jack. “Bridewealth and Dowry in Africa and Eurasia,” Bridewealth and Dowry ed. Jack Goody and S.J. Tambiah (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973), 1-58.
  13. Goody, Jack. Comparative Studies in Kinship (California: Stanford University Press, 1969).
  14. İnan, A. Kadir. Makaleler ve İncelemeleler 2 vols (Ankara: TTK, 1998).
  15. Jacobsen, Esther. The Deer Goddess of Ancient Siberia, a Study in the Ecology of Belief (Leiden, New York, Köln: Brill, 1993).
  16. Jagchid, Sechin, and Symons, Van Jay. Peace, War, and Trade along the Great Wall; Nomadic Chinese Interaction through Two Millennia (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1989).
  17. İzgi, Özkan. “İslamiyet’den Önceki Türklerde Kadın,” Türk Kültürü Araştırmaları (1973-75): 145-160.
  18. Killi, Gülsüm. “Kuzey ve Güneydoğu S