Journals / Fe Dergi / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Feminist Policy on the axis of Governance Feminism: The Foundation for Women's Solidarity as an Example

Feminist Politika Ekseninde Ankara Kadın Dayanışma Vakfı Örneği

Journal
Fe Dergi
Pages
43–58
Publication Date
2017-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Women’s Solidarity Organization’s experiences and financial difficulties in relation with state and other official organizations, and other works of the organization are reviewed over these concepts and discussions

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the relationship between civil society organization CSO , state and feminism; has been addressed within the framework of the “governance feminism” concept.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In terms of feminist NGOs, the usefulness of the “governance feminism strategy” to feminist policy has been discussed in terms of opportunities and risks, and the concepts of globalization, gender mainstreaming and femocratic governance have been utilized in clarifying this concept.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Women’s Solidarity Organization’s experiences and financial difficulties in relation with state and other official organizations, and other works of the organization are reviewed over these concepts and discussions
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:STK · yönetişim feminizmi · küresel feminizm

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between civil society organization CSO , state and feminism; has been addressed within the framework of the “governance feminism” concept. In terms of feminist NGOs, the usefulness of the “governance feminism strategy” to feminist policy has been discussed in terms of opportunities and risks, and the concepts of globalization, gender mainstreaming and femocratic governance have been utilized in clarifying this concept. In order to discuss potential risks and opportunities in the governance feminist strategy, the relation between CSO and state is discussed in terms of financial and political perspectives. Whether external funds from either state or other official resources International organizations such as European Union and United Nations, or embassies are influental in order for CSOs to realize their organizational aims and move in accordance with their principles, is analysed. The question of to what extent should CSOs take position in policy is viewed. Within all the context and concepts, Women’s Solidarity Organization in Ankara is focused as an example of a feminist CSO. Women’s Solidarity Organization’s experiences and financial difficulties in relation with state and other official organizations, and other works of the organization are reviewed over these concepts and discussions

Özet

Bu çalışmada Sivil Toplum Kuruluşu STK , devlet ve feminizm arasındaki ilişki; “yönetişim feminizmi” kavramı çerçevesinde ele alınmıştır. Feminist STK’lar açısından yönetişim feminizmi stratejisinin feminist politika yürütmede işe yararlılığı fırsatlar ve riskler açısından tartışılmış; bu kavramı açıklığa kavuşturmada küreselleşme, toplumsal cinsiyet anaakımlaştırması ve femokratik yönetim kavramlarından faydalanılmıştır. Yönetişim feminizmi stratejisinde potansiyel risk ve fırsatları tartışabilmek için, STK ve devlet ilişkisi finansal ve politik açılardan ele alınmıştır. Devlet finansmanı ve/ya diğer resmi kaynaklardan Avrupa Birliği ve Birleşmiş Milletler gibi uluslararası kuruluşlar veya elçilikler gelen fonların STK’ların kuruluş hedeflerini gerçekleştirmelerinde ve ilkelerine uygun hareket etmelerinde ne derece etkili oldukları sorgulanmıştır. STK’ların ne derece politika içerisinde yer aldıkları veya almaları gerektiği tartışılmıştır. Tüm bu kavram ve bağlamlar dahilinde feminist bir STK örneği olarak Ankara’da bulunan Kadın Dayanışma Vakfı incelenmiştir. Vakıf’ın devlet ve diğer resmi kurumlarla olan ilişkilerinde finansal anlamda yaşadığı zorluk ve deneyimler tartışılarak kuruluşundan günümüze kadar yaptığı çalışmalar söz konusu kavram ve tartışmalar üzerinden merceğe alınmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

UĞUZ, B. (2017). Feminist Policy on the axis of Governance Feminism: The Foundation for Women's Solidarity as an Example. Fe Dergi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 43–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/716114

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alcantara C. Hewilt, “Uses and Abuses of the Concept of Governance”, International Social Science Journal, No:55 (March 1998), 105-113.
  2. Ali Suki, Global Feminist Politics, (London: Routledge, 2000). Arın Canan, “Mor Çatı’nın Kuruluş Öyküsü”, Evdeki Terör Kadına Yönelik Şiddet, (Mor Çatı Yayınları, İstanbul, 1996), 145- 151. Bayrakçeken-Tüzel Gökçe ve Gediz Gelegen Didem, Evim, Güzel Evim: Bir Sığınmaevinde Feminist Yapı Çözümü, Fe Dergi 2, no:1, (2010):43-57. Bernal Victoria ve Grewal Inderpal (ed.), Theorising NGOs: Feminist Struggles, States and Neoliberalism, (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014). Brooks Rosa Ehrenreich, “Feminism and International Law: An Opportunity for Transformation”, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, no:14, (2002): 345-361.
  3. Catharine MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, 237-249 (Harvard University Press,
  4. Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1989). Clark John, “The State, Popular Participation, and the Voluntary Sector”, World Development 23, No: 4 (1995): 593-601.
  5. Cerny, Philip G. ‘International finance and the erosion of state policy capacity’, Philip Gummett (ed.) Globalization and Public Policy, (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996).
  6. Cespedes-Baez Lina M., Far Beyond What Is Measured: Governance Feminism and Indicators in Colombia, 25 International Law, Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional, 311-374 (2014). Edwards Michael ve Hulme David, “Too Close for Comfort? The Impact of Official Aid on Non Governmental Organizations”, World Development 24, no: 6 (1996): 961-973.
  7. Fanington, John ve Lewis David, (Ed.), NGOs and the State in Asia: Rethinking roles in Sustainable Agricultural Development (London: Routledge, 1993).
  8. Findlay Tammy, Femocratic Administration, Gender, Governance, and Democracy in Ontario, (Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 2015).
  9. Fowler, Alan, “Distant obligations: Speculations on NGO funding and the global market,” Review of African Political Economy, no. 55 (1992): 9-29.
  10. Gaudin, Jean Pierre, Modern Governance, Yesterday and Today: Some Clarifications to be Gained from French Government Policies”, International Social Science Journal, no:155 (March 1998), 47-55.
  11. Halley Janet et. al. “From the International to the Local in Feminist Legal Responses to Rape, Prostutition/ Sex Work, And Sex Trafficking: Four Studies in Contemporary Governance Feminism” Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 29, no:2 (2006): 335-423. Hanmer Jalna, ‘Violence and the social control of women’, Gary Littlejohn, Barry Smart, John Wake